1. Evolutionary Biology
  2. Neuroscience
Download icon

A cerebellar substrate for cognition evolved multiple times independently in mammals

  1. Jeroen B Smaers  Is a corresponding author
  2. Alan H Turner
  3. Aida Gómez-Robles
  4. Chet C Sherwood
  1. Stony Brook University, United States
  2. University College London, United Kingdom
  3. The George Washington University, United States
Research Article
  • Cited 27
  • Views 2,708
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2018;7:e35696 doi: 10.7554/eLife.35696

Abstract

Given that complex behavior evolved multiple times independently in different lineages, a crucial question is whether these independent evolutionary events coincided with modifications to common neural systems. To test this question in mammals, we investigate the lateral cerebellum, a neurobiological system that is novel to mammals, and is associated with higher cognitive functions. We map the evolutionary diversification of the mammalian cerebellum and find that relative volumetric changes of the lateral cerebellar hemispheres (independent of cerebellar size) are correlated with measures of domain-general cognition in primates, and are characterized by a combination of parallel and convergent shifts towards similar levels of expansion in distantly related mammalian lineages. Results suggest that multiple independent evolutionary occurrences of increased behavioral complexity in mammals may at least partly be explained by selection on a common neural system, the cerebellum, which may have been subject to multiple independent neurodevelopmental remodeling events during mammalian evolution.

Data availability

The brain data and the phylogeny that were used in the analyses are available as source data files (Figure 2 - source data 1, and Figure 3 - source data 1). Behavioral data for primates is available from Figure 2 Deaner RO, Van Schaik CP, Johnson V. 2006. Do some taxa have better domain-general cognition than others? A meta-analysis of nonhuman primate studies. Evolutionary Psychology 4: 149-196.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jeroen B Smaers

    Department of Anthropology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, United States
    For correspondence
    jeroen.smaers@stonybrook.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1741-9839
  2. Alan H Turner

    Department of Anatomical Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Aida Gómez-Robles

    Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Chet C Sherwood

    Department of Anthropology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Wenner Gren Foundation (Grant 9209)

  • Jeroen B Smaers

James S. McDonnell Foundation (220020293)

  • Chet C Sherwood

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Mike Paulin, University of Otago, New Zealand

Publication history

  1. Received: February 6, 2018
  2. Accepted: May 21, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: May 29, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: June 15, 2018 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2018, Smaers et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,708
    Page views
  • 425
    Downloads
  • 27
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, Scopus, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Mato Lagator et al.
    Research Article

    Predicting function from sequence is a central problem of biology. Currently, this is possible only locally in a narrow mutational neighborhood around a wildtype sequence rather than globally from any sequence. Using random mutant libraries, we developed a biophysical model that accounts for multiple features of σ70 binding bacterial promoters to predict constitutive gene expression levels from any sequence. We experimentally and theoretically estimated that 10–20% of random sequences lead to expression and ~80% of non-expressing sequences are one mutation away from a functional promoter. The potential for generating expression from random sequences is so pervasive that selection acts against σ70-RNA polymerase binding sites even within inter-genic, promoter-containing regions. This pervasiveness of σ70-binding sites implies that emergence of promoters is not the limiting step in gene regulatory evolution. Ultimately, the inclusion of novel features of promoter function into a mechanistic model enabled not only more accurate predictions of gene expression levels, but also identified that promoters evolve more rapidly than previously thought.

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    Guy Alexander Cooper et al.
    Research Article Updated

    Recent theory has overturned the assumption that accelerating returns from individual specialisation are required to favour the evolution of division of labour. Yanni et al., 2020, showed that topologically constrained groups, where cells cooperate with only direct neighbours such as for filaments or branching growths, can evolve a reproductive division of labour even with diminishing returns from individual specialisation. We develop a conceptual framework and specific models to investigate the factors that can favour the initial evolution of reproductive division of labour. We find that selection for division of labour in topologically constrained groups: (1) is not a single mechanism to favour division of labour—depending upon details of the group structure, division of labour can be favoured for different reasons; (2) always involves an efficiency benefit at the level of group fitness; and (3) requires a mechanism of coordination to determine which individuals perform which tasks. Given that such coordination must evolve prior to or concurrently with division of labour, this could limit the extent to which topological constraints favoured the initial evolution of division of labour. We conclude by suggesting experimental designs that could determine why division of labour is favoured in the natural world.