Model-based fMRI reveals dissimilarity processes underlying base rate neglect

  1. Sean R O'Bryan  Is a corresponding author
  2. Darrell A Worthy
  3. Evan J Livesey
  4. Tyler Davis
  1. Texas Tech University, United States
  2. Texas A&M University, United States
  3. University of Sydney, Australia

Abstract

Extensive evidence suggests that people use base rate information inconsistently in decision making. A classic example is the inverse base rate effect (IBRE), whereby participants classify ambiguous stimuli sharing features of both common and rare categories as members of the rare category. Computational models of the IBRE have either posited that it arises from associative similarity-based mechanisms or dissimilarity-based processes that may depend upon higher-level inference. Here we develop a hybrid model, which posits that similarity- and dissimilarity-based evidence both contribute to the IBRE, and test it using functional magnetic resonance imaging data collected from human subjects completing an IBRE task. Consistent with our model, multivoxel pattern analysis reveals that activation patterns on ambiguous test trials contain information consistent with dissimilarity-based processing. Further, trial-by-trial activation in left rostrolateral prefrontal cortex tracks model-based predictions for dissimilarity-based processing, consistent with theories positing a role for higher-level symbolic processing in the IBRE.

Data availability

Source data and scripts used to create all figures and tables (e.g., R code, PyMVPA scripts, statistical maps for the model-based fMRI analysis) are posted to a publicly available online repository (Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/atbz7/). Raw fMRI data for the study organized according to Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) guidelines are available at https://openneuro.org/datasets/ds001302.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sean R O'Bryan

    Department of Psychological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, United States
    For correspondence
    sean.r.obryan@ttu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0562-8211
  2. Darrell A Worthy

    Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Evan J Livesey

    School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Tyler Davis

    Department of Psychological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Texas Tech University

  • Tyler Davis

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: Subjects provided written informed consent before taking part in the study, and all procedures involving human subjects were approved by the Texas Tech University Institutional Review Board.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Timothy Verstynen, Carnegie Mellon University, United States

Publication history

  1. Received: March 5, 2018
  2. Accepted: August 1, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: August 3, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: August 24, 2018 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2018, O'Bryan et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 991
    Page views
  • 126
    Downloads
  • 7
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Sean R O'Bryan
  2. Darrell A Worthy
  3. Evan J Livesey
  4. Tyler Davis
(2018)
Model-based fMRI reveals dissimilarity processes underlying base rate neglect
eLife 7:e36395.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36395

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Vasileios Dimakopoulos et al.
    Research Article

    The maintenance of items in working memory (WM) relies on a widespread network of cortical areas and hippocampus where synchronization between electrophysiological recordings reflects functional coupling. We investigated the direction of information flow between auditory cortex and hippocampus while participants heard and then mentally replayed strings of letters in WM by activating their phonological loop. We recorded local field potentials from the hippocampus, reconstructed beamforming sources of scalp EEG, and – additionally in four participants – recorded from subdural cortical electrodes. When analyzing Granger causality, the information flow was from auditory cortex to hippocampus with a peak in the [4 8] Hz range while participants heard the letters. This flow was subsequently reversed during maintenance while participants maintained the letters in memory. The functional interaction between hippocampus and the cortex and the reversal of information flow provide a physiological basis for the encoding of memory items and their active replay during maintenance.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Raymond Doudlah et al.
    Research Advance

    Visually guided behaviors require the brain to transform ambiguous retinal images into object-level spatial representations and implement sensorimotor transformations. These processes are supported by the dorsal 'where' pathway. However, the specific functional contributions of areas along this pathway remain elusive due in part to methodological differences across studies. We previously showed that macaque caudal intraparietal (CIP) area neurons possess robust three-dimensional (3D) visual representations, carry choice- and saccade-related activity, and exhibit experience-dependent sensorimotor associations (Chang et al., 2020b). Here, we used a common experimental design to reveal parallel processing, hierarchical transformations, and the formation of sensorimotor associations along the 'where' pathway by extending the investigation to V3A, a major feedforward input to CIP. Higher-level 3D representations and choice-related activity were more prevalent in CIP than V3A. Both areas contained saccade-related activity that predicted the direction/timing of eye movements. Intriguingly, the time-course of saccade-related activity in CIP aligned with the temporally integrated V3A output. Sensorimotor associations between 3D orientation and saccade direction preferences were stronger in CIP than V3A, and moderated by choice signals in both areas. Together, the results explicate parallel representations, hierarchical transformations, and functional associations of visual and saccade-related signals at a key juncture in the 'where' pathway.