H3.3K27M mutant proteins reprogram epigenome by sequestering the PRC2 complex to poised enhancers

  1. Dong Fang
  2. Haiyun Gan
  3. Liang Cheng
  4. Jeong-Heon Lee
  5. Hui Zhou
  6. Jann N Sarkaria
  7. David J Daniels
  8. Zhiguo Zhang  Is a corresponding author
  1. Columbia University, United States
  2. Mayo Clinic, United States

Abstract

Expression of histone H3.3K27M mutant proteins in human diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) results in a global reduction of tri-methylation of H3K27 (H3K27me3), and paradoxically, H3K27me3 peaks remain at hundreds of genomic loci, a dichotomous change that lacks mechanistic insights. Here we show that the PRC2 complex is sequestered at poised enhancers, but not at active promoters with high levels of H3.3K27M proteins, thereby contributing to the global reduction of H3K27me3. Moreover, the levels of H3.3K27M proteins are low at the retained H3K27me3 peaks and consequently having minimal effects on the PRC2 activity at these loci. H3K27me3-mediated silencing at specific tumor suppressor genes, including Wilms Tumor 1, promotes proliferation of DIPG cells. These results support a model in which the PRC2 complex is redistributed to poised enhancers in H3.3K27M mutant cells and contributes to tumorigenesis in part by locally enhancing H3K27 trimethylation, and hence silencing of tumor suppressor genes.

Data availability

Sequencing data have been deposited in GEO under accession codes GSE94834

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Dong Fang

    Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Haiyun Gan

    Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Liang Cheng

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Jeong-Heon Lee

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Hui Zhou

    Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Jann N Sarkaria

    Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. David J Daniels

    Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Zhiguo Zhang

    Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    zz2401@cumc.columbia.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9451-2685

Funding

National Institutes of Health (CA204297)

  • Zhiguo Zhang

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2018, Fang et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,932
    views
  • 809
    downloads
  • 79
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Dong Fang
  2. Haiyun Gan
  3. Liang Cheng
  4. Jeong-Heon Lee
  5. Hui Zhou
  6. Jann N Sarkaria
  7. David J Daniels
  8. Zhiguo Zhang
(2018)
H3.3K27M mutant proteins reprogram epigenome by sequestering the PRC2 complex to poised enhancers
eLife 7:e36696.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36696

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36696

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Shihui Chen, Carolyn Marie Phillips
    Research Article

    RNA interference (RNAi) is a conserved pathway that utilizes Argonaute proteins and their associated small RNAs to exert gene regulatory function on complementary transcripts. While the majority of germline-expressed RNAi proteins reside in perinuclear germ granules, it is unknown whether and how RNAi pathways are spatially organized in other cell types. Here, we find that the small RNA biogenesis machinery is spatially and temporally organized during Caenorhabditis elegans embryogenesis. Specifically, the RNAi factor, SIMR-1, forms visible concentrates during mid-embryogenesis that contain an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, a poly-UG polymerase, and the unloaded nuclear Argonaute protein, NRDE-3. Curiously, coincident with the appearance of the SIMR granules, the small RNAs bound to NRDE-3 switch from predominantly CSR-class 22G-RNAs to ERGO-dependent 22G-RNAs. NRDE-3 binds ERGO-dependent 22G-RNAs in the somatic cells of larvae and adults to silence ERGO-target genes; here we further demonstrate that NRDE-3-bound, CSR-class 22G-RNAs repress transcription in oocytes. Thus, our study defines two separable roles for NRDE-3, targeting germline-expressed genes during oogenesis to promote global transcriptional repression, and switching during embryogenesis to repress recently duplicated genes and retrotransposons in somatic cells, highlighting the plasticity of Argonaute proteins and the need for more precise temporal characterization of Argonaute-small RNA interactions.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Steven Henikoff, David L Levens
    Insight

    A new method for mapping torsion provides insights into the ways that the genome responds to the torsion generated by RNA polymerase II.