Stage-dependent remodeling of projections to motor cortex in ALS mouse model revealed by a new variant retrograde-AAV9

  1. Barbara Commisso
  2. Lingjun Ding
  3. Karl Varadi
  4. Martin Gorges
  5. David Bayer
  6. Tobias M Boeckers
  7. Albert C Ludolph
  8. Jan Kassubek
  9. Oliver Mueller
  10. Francesco Roselli  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Ulm, Germany
  2. University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany
  3. University of Kiel, Germany

Abstract

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) is characterized by the progressive degeneration of motoneurons in the primary motor cortex (pMO) and in spinal cord. However, the pathogenic process involves multiple subnetworks in the brain and functional MRI studies demonstrate an increase in functional connectivity in areas connected to pMO despite the ongoing neurodegeneration. The extent and the structural basis of the motor subnetwork remodelling in experimentally-tractable models remain unclear. We have developed a new retrograde AAV9 to quantitatively map the projections to pMO in the SOD1(G93A) ALS mouse model. We show an increase in the number of neurons projecting from somatosensory cortex to pMO at presymptomatic stages, followed by an increase in projections from thalamus, auditory cortex and contralateral MO (inputs from 20 other structures remains unchanged) as disease advances. The stage- and structure-dependent remodeling of projection to pMO in ALS may provide insights into the hyperconnectivity observed in ALS patients.

Data availability

All the murine data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. The raw images are deposited on the Dataverse database (https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/5VNSXE)

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Barbara Commisso

    Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Lingjun Ding

    Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Karl Varadi

    Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Martin Gorges

    Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. David Bayer

    Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Tobias M Boeckers

    Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Albert C Ludolph

    Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Jan Kassubek

    Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Oliver Mueller

    Dept. of Internal Medicine III, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Francesco Roselli

    Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
    For correspondence
    francesco.roselli@uni-ulm.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9935-6899

Funding

Baustein program-Ulm University Medical Faculty

  • Francesco Roselli

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (GRK1789)

  • David Bayer

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experiments have been approved by the Regierungpraesidium Tubingen under the licence no. 1312. All animals were handled according to the federal regulations on animal experimentations and under the supervision of the local veterinary office. Every effort was made to adhere to the 3R guidelines and to minimize suffering.

Human subjects: All subjects included in the human study provided written informed consent according to institutional guidelines; the consent includes the declaration of the understanding of the study design, the agreement to the participation to the study, to the publication of the results, and to the data protection and anonymization procedures (under the chaptes Einwilligungserklaerung"", ""Probandeninformation"", ""Darstellung der Experimente"", ""Datenschutzerklärung""). The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Ulm University, Ulm, Germany (reference #19/12) and was performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Copyright

© 2018, Commisso et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,635
    views
  • 440
    downloads
  • 22
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Barbara Commisso
  2. Lingjun Ding
  3. Karl Varadi
  4. Martin Gorges
  5. David Bayer
  6. Tobias M Boeckers
  7. Albert C Ludolph
  8. Jan Kassubek
  9. Oliver Mueller
  10. Francesco Roselli
(2018)
Stage-dependent remodeling of projections to motor cortex in ALS mouse model revealed by a new variant retrograde-AAV9
eLife 7:e36892.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36892

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36892

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Brian DePasquale, Carlos D Brody, Jonathan W Pillow
    Research Article

    Accumulating evidence to make decisions is a core cognitive function. Previous studies have tended to estimate accumulation using either neural or behavioral data alone. Here we develop a unified framework for modeling stimulus-driven behavior and multi-neuron activity simultaneously. We applied our method to choices and neural recordings from three rat brain regions - the posterior parietal cortex (PPC), the frontal orienting fields (FOF), and the anterior-dorsal striatum (ADS) - while subjects performed a pulse-based accumulation task. Each region was best described by a distinct accumulation model, which all differed from the model that best described the animal's choices. FOF activity was consistent with an accumulator where early evidence was favored while the ADS reflected near perfect accumulation. Neural responses within an accumulation framework unveiled a distinct association between each brain region and choice. Choices were better predicted from all regions using a comprehensive, accumulation-based framework and different brain regions were found to differentially reflect choice-related accumulation signals: FOF and ADS both reflected choice but ADS showed more instances of decision vacillation. Previous studies relating neural data to behaviorally-inferred accumulation dynamics have implicitly assumed that individual brain regions reflect the whole-animal level accumulator. Our results suggest that different brain regions represent accumulated evidence in dramatically different ways and that accumulation at the whole-animal level may be constructed from a variety of neural-level accumulators.

    1. Neuroscience
    Sandra P Cárdenas-García, Sundas Ijaz, Alberto E Pereda
    Research Article Updated

    Most nervous systems combine both transmitter-mediated and direct cell–cell communication, known as ‘chemical’ and ‘electrical’ synapses, respectively. Chemical synapses can be identified by their multiple structural components. Electrical synapses are, on the other hand, generally defined by the presence of a ‘gap junction’ (a cluster of intercellular channels) between two neuronal processes. However, while gap junctions provide the communicating mechanism, it is unknown whether electrical transmission requires the contribution of additional cellular structures. We investigated this question at identifiable single synaptic contacts on the zebrafish Mauthner cells, at which gap junctions coexist with specializations for neurotransmitter release and where the contact unequivocally defines the anatomical limits of a synapse. Expansion microscopy of these single contacts revealed a detailed map of the incidence and spatial distribution of proteins pertaining to various synaptic structures. Multiple gap junctions of variable size were identified by the presence of their molecular components. Remarkably, most of the synaptic contact’s surface was occupied by interleaving gap junctions and components of adherens junctions, suggesting a close functional association between these two structures. In contrast, glutamate receptors were confined to small peripheral portions of the contact, indicating that most of the synaptic area functions as an electrical synapse. Thus, our results revealed the overarching organization of an electrical synapse that operates with not one, but multiple gap junctions, in close association with structural and signaling molecules known to be components of adherens junctions. The relationship between these intercellular structures will aid in establishing the boundaries of electrical synapses found throughout animal connectomes and provide insight into the structural organization and functional diversity of electrical synapses.