Mitotic progression, arrest, exit or death relies on centromere structural integrity, rather than de novo transcription

  1. Marco Novais-Cruz
  2. Maria Alba Abad
  3. Wilfred FJ van IJcken
  4. Niels Galjart
  5. A Arockia Jeyaprakash
  6. Helder Maiato  Is a corresponding author
  7. Cristina Ferrás  Is a corresponding author
  1. Universidade do Porto, Portugal
  2. University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  3. Erasmus Medical Center, Netherlands

Abstract

Recent studies have challenged the prevailing dogma that transcription is repressed during mitosis. Transcription was also proposed to sustain a robust spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) response. Here we used live-cell imaging of human cells, RNA-seq and qPCR to investigate the requirement for de novo transcription during mitosis. Under conditions of persistently unattached kinetochores, transcription inhibition with actinomycin D, or treatment with other DNA-intercalating drugs, delocalized the chromosomal passenger complex (CPC) protein Aurora B from centromeres, compromising SAC signalling and cell fate. However, we were unable to detect significant changes in mitotic transcript levels. Moreover, inhibition of transcription independently of DNA intercalation had no effect on Aurora B centromeric localization, SAC response, mitotic progression, exit or death. Mechanistically, we show that DNA intercalating agents reduce the interaction of the CPC with nucleosomes. Thus, mitotic progression, arrest, exit or death is determined by centromere structural integrity, rather than de novo transcription.

Data availability

Processed RNA-seq have been deposited and can be consulted athttps://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/experiments/E-MTAB-6661

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Marco Novais-Cruz

    Chromosome Instability and Dynamics Laboratory, Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Maria Alba Abad

    Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Wilfred FJ van IJcken

    Centre for Biomics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0421-8301
  4. Niels Galjart

    Department of Cell Biology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. A Arockia Jeyaprakash

    Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Helder Maiato

    Chromosome Instability and Dynamics Laboratory, Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
    For correspondence
    maiato@i3s.up.pt
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6200-9997
  7. Cristina Ferrás

    Chromosome Instability and Dynamics Laboratory, Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
    For correspondence
    cristina.ferras@ibmc.up.pt
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1134-7387

Funding

FEDER-Fundo Europeu de desenvolvimento Regional funds through the COMPETE 2020 (Norte-01-0145-FEDER-000029)

  • Cristina Ferrás

FEDER-Fundo Europeu de Desenvolvimento Regional funds through the COMPETE 2020 (Norte-07-0124-FEDER-000003)

  • Cristina Ferrás

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (EXPL/IF/00765/2014/CP1241/CT0003)

  • Cristina Ferrás

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT Investigator grant IF/00765/2014)

  • Cristina Ferrás

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT PhD grant SFRH/BD/117063/2016)

  • Marco Novais-Cruz

European Research Council (CODECHECK)

  • Helder Maiato

FLAD Life Science

  • Helder Maiato

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2018, Novais-Cruz et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,869
    views
  • 646
    downloads
  • 17
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Marco Novais-Cruz
  2. Maria Alba Abad
  3. Wilfred FJ van IJcken
  4. Niels Galjart
  5. A Arockia Jeyaprakash
  6. Helder Maiato
  7. Cristina Ferrás
(2018)
Mitotic progression, arrest, exit or death relies on centromere structural integrity, rather than de novo transcription
eLife 7:e36898.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36898

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36898

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Ling Cheng, Ian Meliala ... Mikael Björklund
    Research Article

    Mitochondrial dysfunction is involved in numerous diseases and the aging process. The integrated stress response (ISR) serves as a critical adaptation mechanism to a variety of stresses, including those originating from mitochondria. By utilizing mass spectrometry-based cellular thermal shift assay (MS-CETSA), we uncovered that phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein 1 (PEBP1), also known as Raf kinase inhibitory protein (RKIP), is thermally stabilized by stresses which induce mitochondrial ISR. Depletion of PEBP1 impaired mitochondrial ISR activation by reducing eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2α (eIF2α) phosphorylation and subsequent ISR gene expression, which was independent of PEBP1’s role in inhibiting the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway. Consistently, overexpression of PEBP1 potentiated ISR activation by heme-regulated inhibitor (HRI) kinase, the principal eIF2α kinase in the mitochondrial ISR pathway. Real-time interaction analysis using luminescence complementation in live cells revealed an interaction between PEBP1 and eIF2α, which was disrupted by eIF2α S51 phosphorylation. These findings suggest a role for PEBP1 in amplifying mitochondrial stress signals, thereby facilitating an effective cellular response to mitochondrial dysfunction. Therefore, PEBP1 may be a potential therapeutic target for diseases associated with mitochondrial dysfunction.

    1. Cell Biology
    Nancy Nader, Lama Assaf ... Khaled Machaca
    Research Article

    The steroid hormone progesterone (P4) regulates multiple aspects of reproductive and metabolic physiology. Classical P4 signaling operates through nuclear receptors that regulate transcription. In addition, P4 signals through membrane P4 receptors (mPRs) in a rapid nongenomic modality. Despite the established physiological importance of P4 nongenomic signaling, the details of its signal transduction cascade remain elusive. Here, using Xenopus oocyte maturation as a well-established physiological readout of nongenomic P4 signaling, we identify the lipid hydrolase ABHD2 (α/β hydrolase domain-containing protein 2) as an essential mPRβ co-receptor to trigger meiosis. We show using functional assays coupled to unbiased and targeted cell-based lipidomics that ABHD2 possesses a phospholipase A2 (PLA2) activity that requires mPRβ. This PLA2 activity bifurcates P4 signaling by inducing clathrin-dependent endocytosis of mPRβ, resulting in the production of lipid messengers that are G-protein coupled receptor agonists. Therefore, P4 drives meiosis by inducing an ABHD2 PLA2 activity that requires both mPRβ and ABHD2 as obligate co-receptors.