Abstract

Intron splicing increases proteome complexity, promotes RNA stability, and enhances transcription. However, introns and the concomitant need for splicing extend the time required for gene expression and can cause an undesirable delay in the activation of genes. Here, we show that the plant microRNA processing factor SERRATE (SE) plays an unexpected and pivotal role in the regulation of intronless genes. Arabidopsis SE associated with more than 1000, mainly intronless, genes in a transcription-dependent manner. Chromatin-bound SE liaised with paused and elongating polymerase II complexes and promoted their association with intronless target genes. Our results indicate that stress-responsive genes contain no or few introns, which negatively affects their expression strength, but that some genes circumvent this limitation via a novel SE-dependent transcriptional activation mechanism. Transcriptome analysis of a Drosophila mutant defective in ARS2, the metazoan homologue of SE, suggests that SE/ARS2 function in regulating intronless genes might be conserved across kingdoms.

Data availability

Raw data have been deposited under accession codes accession number ERP016859 (ENA), PXD006004 (Pride) and GSE99367 (Geo Omnibus).

The following data sets were generated
    1. Martinho C
    2. Speth C
    3. Szabo EX
    4. Laubinger S
    (2018) RNA-seq of se mutants
    Publicly available at the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (accession no: GSE99367).
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Corinna Speth

    Centre for Plant Molecular Biology (ZMBP), University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Emese Xochitl Szabo

    Centre for Plant Molecular Biology (ZMBP), University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Claudia Martinho

    Centre for Plant Molecular Biology (ZMBP), University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Silvio Collani

    Department of Plant Physiology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9603-0882
  5. Sven zur Oven-Krockhaus

    Centre for Plant Molecular Biology (ZMBP), University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Sandra Richter

    Centre for Plant Molecular Biology (ZMBP), University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Irina Droste-Borel

    Proteome Centre, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Boris Macek

    Proteome Centre, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. York-Dieter Stierhof

    Center for Plant Molecular Biology (ZMBP), University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Markus Schmid

    Department of Plant Physiology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Chang Liu

    Center for Plant Molecular Biology (ZMBP), University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2859-4288
  12. Sascha Laubinger

    Center for Plant Molecular Biology (ZMBP), University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
    For correspondence
    sascha.laubinger@uol.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6682-0728

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

  • Sascha Laubinger

Max-Planck-Gesellschaft (Open-access funding)

  • Sven zur Oven-Krockhaus
  • York-Dieter Stierhof
  • Sascha Laubinger

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Yijun Qi, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, China

Version history

  1. Received: March 28, 2018
  2. Accepted: August 22, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: August 28, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: September 12, 2018 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2018, Speth et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,882
    views
  • 676
    downloads
  • 32
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Corinna Speth
  2. Emese Xochitl Szabo
  3. Claudia Martinho
  4. Silvio Collani
  5. Sven zur Oven-Krockhaus
  6. Sandra Richter
  7. Irina Droste-Borel
  8. Boris Macek
  9. York-Dieter Stierhof
  10. Markus Schmid
  11. Chang Liu
  12. Sascha Laubinger
(2018)
Arabidopsis RNA processing factor SERRATE regulates the transcription of intronless genes
eLife 7:e37078.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37078

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37078

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Ramona Weber, Chung-Te Chang
    Research Article

    Recent findings indicate that the translation elongation rate influences mRNA stability. One of the factors that has been implicated in this link between mRNA decay and translation speed is the yeast DEAD-box helicase Dhh1p. Here, we demonstrated that the human ortholog of Dhh1p, DDX6, triggers the deadenylation-dependent decay of inefficiently translated mRNAs in human cells. DDX6 interacts with the ribosome through the Phe-Asp-Phe (FDF) motif in its RecA2 domain. Furthermore, RecA2-mediated interactions and ATPase activity are both required for DDX6 to destabilize inefficiently translated mRNAs. Using ribosome profiling and RNA sequencing, we identified two classes of endogenous mRNAs that are regulated in a DDX6-dependent manner. The identified targets are either translationally regulated or regulated at the steady-state-level and either exhibit signatures of poor overall translation or of locally reduced ribosome translocation rates. Transferring the identified sequence stretches into a reporter mRNA caused translation- and DDX6-dependent degradation of the reporter mRNA. In summary, these results identify DDX6 as a crucial regulator of mRNA translation and decay triggered by slow ribosome movement and provide insights into the mechanism by which DDX6 destabilizes inefficiently translated mRNAs.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Marwan Anoud, Emmanuelle Delagoutte ... Jean-Paul Concordet
    Research Article

    Tardigrades are microscopic animals renowned for their ability to withstand extreme conditions, including high doses of ionizing radiation (IR). To better understand their radio-resistance, we first characterized induction and repair of DNA double- and single-strand breaks after exposure to IR in the model species Hypsibius exemplaris. Importantly, we found that the rate of single-strand breaks induced was roughly equivalent to that in human cells, suggesting that DNA repair plays a predominant role in tardigrades’ radio-resistance. To identify novel tardigrade-specific genes involved, we next conducted a comparative transcriptomics analysis across three different species. In all three species, many DNA repair genes were among the most strongly overexpressed genes alongside a novel tardigrade-specific gene, which we named Tardigrade DNA damage Response 1 (TDR1). We found that TDR1 protein interacts with DNA and forms aggregates at high concentration suggesting it may condensate DNA and preserve chromosome organization until DNA repair is accomplished. Remarkably, when expressed in human cells, TDR1 improved resistance to Bleomycin, a radiomimetic drug. Based on these findings, we propose that TDR1 is a novel tardigrade-specific gene conferring resistance to IR. Our study sheds light on mechanisms of DNA repair helping cope with high levels of DNA damage inflicted by IR.