Abstract

Intron splicing increases proteome complexity, promotes RNA stability, and enhances transcription. However, introns and the concomitant need for splicing extend the time required for gene expression and can cause an undesirable delay in the activation of genes. Here, we show that the plant microRNA processing factor SERRATE (SE) plays an unexpected and pivotal role in the regulation of intronless genes. Arabidopsis SE associated with more than 1000, mainly intronless, genes in a transcription-dependent manner. Chromatin-bound SE liaised with paused and elongating polymerase II complexes and promoted their association with intronless target genes. Our results indicate that stress-responsive genes contain no or few introns, which negatively affects their expression strength, but that some genes circumvent this limitation via a novel SE-dependent transcriptional activation mechanism. Transcriptome analysis of a Drosophila mutant defective in ARS2, the metazoan homologue of SE, suggests that SE/ARS2 function in regulating intronless genes might be conserved across kingdoms.

Data availability

Raw data have been deposited under accession codes accession number ERP016859 (ENA), PXD006004 (Pride) and GSE99367 (Geo Omnibus).

The following data sets were generated
    1. Martinho C
    2. Speth C
    3. Szabo EX
    4. Laubinger S
    (2018) RNA-seq of se mutants
    Publicly available at the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (accession no: GSE99367).
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Corinna Speth

    Centre for Plant Molecular Biology (ZMBP), University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Emese Xochitl Szabo

    Centre for Plant Molecular Biology (ZMBP), University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Claudia Martinho

    Centre for Plant Molecular Biology (ZMBP), University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Silvio Collani

    Department of Plant Physiology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9603-0882
  5. Sven zur Oven-Krockhaus

    Centre for Plant Molecular Biology (ZMBP), University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Sandra Richter

    Centre for Plant Molecular Biology (ZMBP), University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Irina Droste-Borel

    Proteome Centre, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Boris Macek

    Proteome Centre, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. York-Dieter Stierhof

    Center for Plant Molecular Biology (ZMBP), University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Markus Schmid

    Department of Plant Physiology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Chang Liu

    Center for Plant Molecular Biology (ZMBP), University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2859-4288
  12. Sascha Laubinger

    Center for Plant Molecular Biology (ZMBP), University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
    For correspondence
    sascha.laubinger@uol.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6682-0728

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

  • Sascha Laubinger

Max-Planck-Gesellschaft (Open-access funding)

  • Sven zur Oven-Krockhaus
  • York-Dieter Stierhof
  • Sascha Laubinger

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2018, Speth et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,045
    views
  • 696
    downloads
  • 37
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Corinna Speth
  2. Emese Xochitl Szabo
  3. Claudia Martinho
  4. Silvio Collani
  5. Sven zur Oven-Krockhaus
  6. Sandra Richter
  7. Irina Droste-Borel
  8. Boris Macek
  9. York-Dieter Stierhof
  10. Markus Schmid
  11. Chang Liu
  12. Sascha Laubinger
(2018)
Arabidopsis RNA processing factor SERRATE regulates the transcription of intronless genes
eLife 7:e37078.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37078

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37078

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Steven Henikoff, David L Levens
    Insight

    A new method for mapping torsion provides insights into the ways that the genome responds to the torsion generated by RNA polymerase II.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Bhumil Patel, Maryke Grobler ... Needhi Bhalla
    Research Article

    Meiotic crossover recombination is essential for both accurate chromosome segregation and the generation of new haplotypes for natural selection to act upon. This requirement is known as crossover assurance and is one example of crossover control. While the conserved role of the ATPase, PCH-2, during meiotic prophase has been enigmatic, a universal phenotype when pch-2 or its orthologs are mutated is a change in the number and distribution of meiotic crossovers. Here, we show that PCH-2 controls the number and distribution of crossovers by antagonizing their formation. This antagonism produces different effects at different stages of meiotic prophase: early in meiotic prophase, PCH-2 prevents double-strand breaks from becoming crossover-eligible intermediates, limiting crossover formation at sites of initial double-strand break formation and homolog interactions. Later in meiotic prophase, PCH-2 winnows the number of crossover-eligible intermediates, contributing to the designation of crossovers and ultimately, crossover assurance. We also demonstrate that PCH-2 accomplishes this regulation through the meiotic HORMAD, HIM-3. Our data strongly support a model in which PCH-2’s conserved role is to remodel meiotic HORMADs throughout meiotic prophase to destabilize crossover-eligible precursors and coordinate meiotic recombination with synapsis, ensuring the progressive implementation of meiotic recombination and explaining its function in the pachytene checkpoint and crossover control.