FBXL19 recruits CDK-Mediator to CpG islands of developmental genes priming them for activation during lineage commitment

  1. Emilia A Dimitrova
  2. Takashi Kondo
  3. Angelika Feldmann
  4. Manabu Nakayama
  5. Yoko Koseki
  6. Rebecca Konietzny
  7. Benedikt M Kessler
  8. Haruhiko Koseki
  9. Robert J Klose  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Oxford, United Kingdom
  2. RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Japan
  3. Kazusa DNA Research Institute, Japan

Abstract

CpG islands are gene regulatory elements associated with the majority of mammalian promoters, yet how they regulate gene expression remains poorly understood. Here, we identify FBXL19 as a CpG island-binding protein in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells and show that it associates with the CDK-Mediator complex. We discover that FBXL19 recruits CDK-Mediator to CpG island-associated promoters of non-transcribed developmental genes to prime these genes for activation during cell lineage commitment. We further show that recognition of CpG islands by FBXL19 is essential for mouse development. Together this reveals a new CpG island-centric mechanism for CDK-Mediator recruitment to developmental gene promoters in ES cells and a requirement for CDK-Mediator in priming these developmental genes for activation during cell lineage commitment.

Data availability

Sequencing data generated in this study have been deposited in GEO under accession code GSE98756

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Emilia A Dimitrova

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Takashi Kondo

    Laboratory for Developmental Genetics, RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Angelika Feldmann

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Manabu Nakayama

    Department of Technology Development, Kazusa DNA Research Institute, Kisarazu, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Yoko Koseki

    Laboratory of Developmental Genetics, RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Rebecca Konietzny

    TDI Mass Spectrometry Laboratory, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Benedikt M Kessler

    TDI Mass Spectrometry Laboratory, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Haruhiko Koseki

    Laboratory for Developmental Genetics, RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8424-5854
  9. Robert J Klose

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    rob.klose@bioch.ox.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8726-7888

Funding

Wellcome (098024/Z/11/Z)

  • Robert J Klose

European Research Council (681440)

  • Robert J Klose

Lister Institute of Preventive Medicine

  • Robert J Klose

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development

  • Haruhiko Koseki

Sir Henry Wellcome Postdoctoral Fellowship (110286/Z/15/Z)

  • Angelika Feldmann

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2018, Dimitrova et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,893
    views
  • 447
    downloads
  • 24
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Emilia A Dimitrova
  2. Takashi Kondo
  3. Angelika Feldmann
  4. Manabu Nakayama
  5. Yoko Koseki
  6. Rebecca Konietzny
  7. Benedikt M Kessler
  8. Haruhiko Koseki
  9. Robert J Klose
(2018)
FBXL19 recruits CDK-Mediator to CpG islands of developmental genes priming them for activation during lineage commitment
eLife 7:e37084.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37084

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37084

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Steven Henikoff, David L Levens
    Insight

    A new method for mapping torsion provides insights into the ways that the genome responds to the torsion generated by RNA polymerase II.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Bhumil Patel, Maryke Grobler ... Needhi Bhalla
    Research Article

    Meiotic crossover recombination is essential for both accurate chromosome segregation and the generation of new haplotypes for natural selection to act upon. This requirement is known as crossover assurance and is one example of crossover control. While the conserved role of the ATPase, PCH-2, during meiotic prophase has been enigmatic, a universal phenotype when pch-2 or its orthologs are mutated is a change in the number and distribution of meiotic crossovers. Here, we show that PCH-2 controls the number and distribution of crossovers by antagonizing their formation. This antagonism produces different effects at different stages of meiotic prophase: early in meiotic prophase, PCH-2 prevents double-strand breaks from becoming crossover-eligible intermediates, limiting crossover formation at sites of initial double-strand break formation and homolog interactions. Later in meiotic prophase, PCH-2 winnows the number of crossover-eligible intermediates, contributing to the designation of crossovers and ultimately, crossover assurance. We also demonstrate that PCH-2 accomplishes this regulation through the meiotic HORMAD, HIM-3. Our data strongly support a model in which PCH-2’s conserved role is to remodel meiotic HORMADs throughout meiotic prophase to destabilize crossover-eligible precursors and coordinate meiotic recombination with synapsis, ensuring the progressive implementation of meiotic recombination and explaining its function in the pachytene checkpoint and crossover control.