E proteins sharpen neurogenesis by modulating proneural bHLH transcription factors activity in an E-box-dependent manner

Abstract

Class II HLH proteins heterodimerize with class I HLH/E proteins to regulate transcription. Here we show that E proteins sharpen neurogenesis by adjusting the neurogenic strength of the distinct proneural proteins. We find that inhibiting BMP signaling or its target ID2 in the chick embryo spinal cord, impairs the neuronal production from progenitors expressing ATOH1/ASCL1, but less severely that from progenitors expressing NEUROG1/2/PTF1a. We show this context-dependent response to result from the differential modulation of proneural proteins' activity by E proteins. E proteins synergize with proneural proteins when acting on CAGSTG motifs, thereby facilitating the activity of ASCL1/ATOH1 which preferentially bind to such motifs. Conversely, E proteins restrict the neurogenic strength of NEUROG1/2 by directly inhibiting their preferential binding to CADATG motifs. Since we find this mechanism to be conserved in corticogenesis, we propose this differential co-operation of E proteins with proneural proteins as a novel though general feature of their mechanism of action.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Gwenvael Le Dréau

    Department of Developmental Biology, Instituto de Biología Molecular de Barcelona, CSIC, Barcelona, Spain
    For correspondence
    gldbmc@ibmb.csic.es
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6877-3670
  2. René Escalona

    Department of Developmental Biology, Instituto de Biología Molecular de Barcelona, CSIC, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Raquel Fueyo

    Department of Molecular Genomics, Instituto de Biología Molecular de Barcelona, CSIC, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7106-7163
  4. Antonio Herrera

    Department of Cell Biology, Instituto de Biología Molecular de Barcelona, CSIC, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Juan D Martínez

    Department of Developmental Biology, Instituto de Biología Molecular de Barcelona, CSIC, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Susana Usieto

    Department of Developmental Biology, Instituto de Biología Molecular de Barcelona, CSIC, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Anghara Menendez

    Department of Cell Biology, Instituto de Biología Molecular de Barcelona, CSIC, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Sebastian Pons

    Department of Cell Biology, Instituto de Biología Molecular de Barcelona, CSIC, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Marian A Martinez-Balbas

    Department of Molecular Genomics, Instituto de Biología Molecular de Barcelona, CSIC, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Elisa Marti

    Department of Developmental Biology, Instituto de Biología Molecular de Barcelona, CSIC, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5839-7133

Funding

MINECO (BFU2016-81887-REDT)

  • Elisa Marti

MINECO (BFU2016-77498-P)

  • Elisa Marti

AECC (AIO2014)

  • Gwenvael Le Dréau

CONACYT

  • René Escalona

MECD (#FPU13/01384)

  • Raquel Fueyo

MINECO (#FJCI-2015-26175)

  • Antonio Herrera

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2018, Le Dréau et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,234
    views
  • 363
    downloads
  • 25
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Gwenvael Le Dréau
  2. René Escalona
  3. Raquel Fueyo
  4. Antonio Herrera
  5. Juan D Martínez
  6. Susana Usieto
  7. Anghara Menendez
  8. Sebastian Pons
  9. Marian A Martinez-Balbas
  10. Elisa Marti
(2018)
E proteins sharpen neurogenesis by modulating proneural bHLH transcription factors activity in an E-box-dependent manner
eLife 7:e37267.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37267

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37267

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    Satoshi Yamashita, Shuji Ishihara, François Graner
    Research Article

    Apical constriction is a basic mechanism for epithelial morphogenesis, making columnar cells into wedge shape and bending a flat cell sheet. It has long been thought that an apically localized myosin generates a contractile force and drives the cell deformation. However, when we tested the increased apical surface contractility in a cellular Potts model simulation, the constriction increased pressure inside the cell and pushed its lateral surface outward, making the cells adopt a drop shape instead of the expected wedge shape. To keep the lateral surface straight, we considered an alternative model in which the cell shape was determined by cell membrane elasticity and endocytosis, and the increased pressure is balanced among the cells. The cellular Potts model simulation succeeded in reproducing the apical constriction, and it also suggested that a too strong apical surface tension might prevent the tissue invagination.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Sara Jaber, Eliana Eldawra ... Franck Toledo
    Research Article

    Missense ‘hotspot’ mutations localized in six p53 codons account for 20% of TP53 mutations in human cancers. Hotspot p53 mutants have lost the tumor suppressive functions of the wildtype protein, but whether and how they may gain additional functions promoting tumorigenesis remain controversial. Here, we generated Trp53Y217C, a mouse model of the human hotspot mutant TP53Y220C. DNA damage responses were lost in Trp53Y217C/Y217C (Trp53YC/YC) cells, and Trp53YC/YC fibroblasts exhibited increased chromosome instability compared to Trp53-/- cells. Furthermore, Trp53YC/YC male mice died earlier than Trp53-/- males, with more aggressive thymic lymphomas. This correlated with an increased expression of inflammation-related genes in Trp53YC/YC thymic cells compared to Trp53-/- cells. Surprisingly, we recovered only one Trp53YC/YC female for 22 Trp53YC/YC males at weaning, a skewed distribution explained by a high frequency of Trp53YC/YC female embryos with exencephaly and the death of most Trp53YC/YC female neonates. Strikingly, however, when we treated pregnant females with the anti-inflammatory drug supformin (LCC-12), we observed a fivefold increase in the proportion of viable Trp53YC/YC weaned females in their progeny. Together, these data suggest that the p53Y217C mutation not only abrogates wildtype p53 functions but also promotes inflammation, with oncogenic effects in males and teratogenic effects in females.