Mediodorsal thalamus is required for discrete phases of goal-directed behavior in macaques

  1. Evan Wicker
  2. Janita Turchi
  3. Ludise Malkova
  4. Patrick Alexander Forcelli  Is a corresponding author
  1. Georgetown University, United States
  2. National Institutes of Health, United States

Abstract

Reward contingencies are dynamic: outcomes that were valued at one point may subsequently lose value. Action selection in the face of dynamic reward associations requires several cognitive processes: registering a change in value of the primary reinforcer, adjusting the value of secondary reinforcers to reflect the new value of the primary reinforcer, and guiding action selection to optimal choices. Flexible responding has been evaluated extensively using reinforcer devaluation tasks. Performance on this task relies upon amygdala, Areas 11 and 13 of orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), and mediodorsal thalamus (MD). Differential contributions of amygdala and Areas 11 and 13 of OFC to specific sub-processes have been established, but the role of MD in these sub-processes is unknown. Pharmacological inactivation of the macaque MD during specific phases of this task revealed that MD is required for reward valuation and action selection. This profile is unique, differing from both amygdala and subregions of the OFC.

Data availability

The data generated and analyzed during this study are all presented in the manuscript. Raw data for object selection during the testing sessions are shown in Supplemental File 1a and d

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Evan Wicker

    Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, Georgetown University, Washington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Janita Turchi

    Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Ludise Malkova

    Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, Georgetown University, Washington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Patrick Alexander Forcelli

    Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, Georgetown University, Washington, United States
    For correspondence
    paf22@georgetown.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1763-060X

Funding

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (KL2TR001432)

  • Patrick Alexander Forcelli

National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH099505)

  • Ludise Malkova

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Geoffrey Schoenbaum, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: The study was conducted under a protocol approved by the Georgetown University Animal Care and Use Committee (#2016-1115) and in accordance with the Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (26).

Version history

  1. Received: April 6, 2018
  2. Accepted: May 31, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: May 31, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: June 20, 2018 (version 2)

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 1,579
    views
  • 243
    downloads
  • 16
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Evan Wicker
  2. Janita Turchi
  3. Ludise Malkova
  4. Patrick Alexander Forcelli
(2018)
Mediodorsal thalamus is required for discrete phases of goal-directed behavior in macaques
eLife 7:e37325.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37325

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37325

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Wenyu Tu, Samuel R Cramer, Nanyin Zhang
    Research Article

    Resting-state brain networks (RSNs) have been widely applied in health and disease, but the interpretation of RSNs in terms of the underlying neural activity is unclear. To address this fundamental question, we conducted simultaneous recordings of whole-brain resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) and electrophysiology signals in two separate brain regions of rats. Our data reveal that for both recording sites, spatial maps derived from band-specific local field potential (LFP) power can account for up to 90% of the spatial variability in RSNs derived from rsfMRI signals. Surprisingly, the time series of LFP band power can only explain to a maximum of 35% of the temporal variance of the local rsfMRI time course from the same site. In addition, regressing out time series of LFP power from rsfMRI signals has minimal impact on the spatial patterns of rsfMRI-based RSNs. This disparity in the spatial and temporal relationships between resting-state electrophysiology and rsfMRI signals suggests that electrophysiological activity alone does not fully explain the effects observed in the rsfMRI signal, implying the existence of an rsfMRI component contributed by ‘electrophysiology-invisible’ signals. These findings offer a novel perspective on our understanding of RSN interpretation.

    1. Neuroscience
    Shanka Subhra Mondal, Steven Frankland ... Jonathan D Cohen
    Research Article

    Deep neural networks have made tremendous gains in emulating human-like intelligence, and have been used increasingly as ways of understanding how the brain may solve the complex computational problems on which this relies. However, these still fall short of, and therefore fail to provide insight into how the brain supports strong forms of generalization of which humans are capable. One such case is out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization – successful performance on test examples that lie outside the distribution of the training set. Here, we identify properties of processing in the brain that may contribute to this ability. We describe a two-part algorithm that draws on specific features of neural computation to achieve OOD generalization, and provide a proof of concept by evaluating performance on two challenging cognitive tasks. First we draw on the fact that the mammalian brain represents metric spaces using grid cell code (e.g., in the entorhinal cortex): abstract representations of relational structure, organized in recurring motifs that cover the representational space. Second, we propose an attentional mechanism that operates over the grid cell code using determinantal point process (DPP), that we call DPP attention (DPP-A) – a transformation that ensures maximum sparseness in the coverage of that space. We show that a loss function that combines standard task-optimized error with DPP-A can exploit the recurring motifs in the grid cell code, and can be integrated with common architectures to achieve strong OOD generalization performance on analogy and arithmetic tasks. This provides both an interpretation of how the grid cell code in the mammalian brain may contribute to generalization performance, and at the same time a potential means for improving such capabilities in artificial neural networks.