Induction of human Somatostatin and Parvalbumin neurons by expressing a single transcription factor LIM Homeobox 6

  1. Fang Yuan
  2. Xin Chen
  3. Kai-Heng Fang
  4. Yuanyuan Wang
  5. Mingyan Lin
  6. Shi-Bo Xu
  7. Hai-Qin Huo
  8. Min Xu
  9. Lixiang Ma
  10. Yuejun Chen
  11. Shuijin He  Is a corresponding author
  12. Yan Liu  Is a corresponding author
  1. Nanjing Medical University, China
  2. ShanghaiTech University, China
  3. Fudan University, China
  4. Chinese Academy of Sciences, China

Abstract

Human GABAergic interneurons (GIN) are implicated in normal brain function as well as numerous mental disorders. However, generation of functional human GIN subtypes from human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) has not been established. By expressing LHX6, a transcriptional factor critical for GIN development, we have induced hPSCs to GINs, including somatostatin (SST, 29%) and parvalbumin (PV, 21%) neurons. Our RNAseq results also confirmed alteration of GINs identity with the overexpression of LHX6. Five months after transplantation into the mouse brain, the human GABA precursors generated increased population of SST and PV neurons by overexpressing LHX6. Importantly, the grafted human GINs exhibited functional electrophysiological properties and even fast-spiking like action potentials. Thus, expression of the single transcription factor LHX6 under our GIN differentiation condition is sufficient to robustly induce human PV and SST subtypes.

Data availability

Sequencing data have been deposited in GEO under accession codesGSE114553. All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Fang Yuan

    School of Pharmacy, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Xin Chen

    School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Kai-Heng Fang

    School of Pharmacy, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Yuanyuan Wang

    Department of Neuroscience, School of Basic Medical Science, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Mingyan Lin

    Department of Neuroscience, School of Basic Medical Science, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Shi-Bo Xu

    School of Pharmacy, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Hai-Qin Huo

    School of Pharmacy, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Min Xu

    School of Pharmacy, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Lixiang Ma

    Department of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Yuejun Chen

    Institute of Neuroscience, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Shuijin He

    School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China
    For correspondence
    heshj@shanghaitech.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Yan Liu

    School of Pharmacy, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
    For correspondence
    yanliu@njmu.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2918-5398

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (81471301)

  • Yan Liu

National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC1306703)

  • Yan Liu

Jiangsu Outstanding Young Investigator Program (BK20160044)

  • Yan Liu

ShanghaiTech Start-up Foundation

  • Shuijin He

Postgraduate Research and Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province

  • Fang Yuan

Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA16010306)

  • Yan Liu

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31671063)

  • Yan Liu

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: SCID mice were purchased from the Model Animal Research Center of Nanjing University. All of the animal experiments followed standard experimental protocols and were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee at Nanjing Medical University(IACUC-1601129).

Human subjects: H9 cell line was purchased from Wicell Agreeement (NO.16-W0060)For ips cell line, verbal and written consent was obtained from the person.The study was approved by the ethic community of Nanjing Medical University[(2017)NO.217].

Copyright

© 2018, Yuan et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,947
    views
  • 599
    downloads
  • 32
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Fang Yuan
  2. Xin Chen
  3. Kai-Heng Fang
  4. Yuanyuan Wang
  5. Mingyan Lin
  6. Shi-Bo Xu
  7. Hai-Qin Huo
  8. Min Xu
  9. Lixiang Ma
  10. Yuejun Chen
  11. Shuijin He
  12. Yan Liu
(2018)
Induction of human Somatostatin and Parvalbumin neurons by expressing a single transcription factor LIM Homeobox 6
eLife 7:e37382.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37382

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37382

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Kara A Nelson, Kari F Lenhart ... Stephen DiNardo
    Research Article

    Niches are often found in specific positions in tissues relative to the stem cells they support. Consistency of niche position suggests that placement is important for niche function. However, the complexity of most niches has precluded a thorough understanding of how their proper placement is established. To address this, we investigated the formation of a genetically tractable niche, the Drosophila Posterior Signaling Center (PSC), the assembly of which had not been previously explored. This niche controls hematopoietic progenitors of the lymph gland (LG). PSC cells were previously shown to be specified laterally in the embryo, but ultimately reside dorsally, at the LG posterior. Here, using live-imaging, we show that PSC cells migrate as a tight collective and associate with multiple tissues during their trajectory to the LG posterior. We find that Slit emanating from two extrinsic sources, visceral mesoderm and cardioblasts, is required for the PSC to remain a collective, and for its attachment to cardioblasts during migration. Without proper Slit-Robo signaling, PSC cells disperse, form aberrant contacts, and ultimately fail to reach their stereotypical position near progenitors. Our work characterizes a novel example of niche formation and identifies an extrinsic signaling relay that controls precise niche positioning.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Elise S Bruguera, Jacob P Mahoney, William I Weis
    Research Article

    Wnt/β-catenin signaling directs animal development and tissue renewal in a tightly controlled, cell- and tissue-specific manner. In the mammalian central nervous system, the atypical ligand Norrin controls angiogenesis and maintenance of the blood-brain barrier and blood-retina barrier through the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Like Wnt, Norrin activates signaling by binding and heterodimerizing the receptors Frizzled (Fzd) and low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 or 6 (LRP5/6), leading to membrane recruitment of the intracellular transducer Dishevelled (Dvl) and ultimately stabilizing the transcriptional coactivator β-catenin. Unlike Wnt, the cystine knot ligand Norrin only signals through Fzd4 and additionally requires the co-receptor Tetraspanin12 (Tspan12); however, the mechanism underlying Tspan12-mediated signal enhancement is unclear. It has been proposed that Tspan12 integrates into the Norrin-Fzd4 complex to enhance Norrin-Fzd4 affinity or otherwise allosterically modulate Fzd4 signaling. Here, we measure direct, high-affinity binding between purified Norrin and Tspan12 in a lipid environment and use AlphaFold models to interrogate this interaction interface. We find that Tspan12 and Fzd4 can simultaneously bind Norrin and that a pre-formed Tspan12/Fzd4 heterodimer, as well as cells co-expressing Tspan12 and Fzd4, more efficiently capture low concentrations of Norrin than Fzd4 alone. We also show that Tspan12 competes with both heparan sulfate proteoglycans and LRP6 for Norrin binding and that Tspan12 does not impact Fzd4-Dvl affinity in the presence or absence of Norrin. Our findings suggest that Tspan12 does not allosterically enhance Fzd4 binding to Norrin or Dvl, but instead functions to directly capture Norrin upstream of signaling.