SRSF3 promotes pluripotency through Nanog mRNA export and coordination of the pluripotency gene expression program

Abstract

The establishment and maintenance of pluripotency depend on precise coordination of gene expression. We establish serine-arginine rich splicing factor 3 (SRSF3) as an essential regulator of RNAs encoding key components of the mouse pluripotency circuitry, SRSF3 ablation resulting in the loss of pluripotency and its overexpression enhancing reprogramming. Strikingly, SRSF3 binds to the core pluripotency transcription factor Nanog mRNA to facilitate its nucleo-cytoplasmic export independent of splicing. In the absence of SRSF3 binding, Nanog mRNA is sequestered in the nucleus and protein levels are severely downregulated. Moreover, SRSF3 controls the alternative splicing of the export factor Nxf1 and RNA regulators with established roles in pluripotency, and the steady-state levels of mRNAs encoding chromatin modifiers. Our investigation links molecular events to cellular functions by demonstrating how SRSF3 regulates the pluripotency genes and uncovers SRSF3-RNA interactions as a critical means to coordinate gene expression during reprogramming, stem cell self-renewal and early development.

Data availability

Sequencing data sets have been deposited in GEO under accession codes GSE101905 and GSE113794. The iCLIP data has been made available in the public version of iCount (http://icount.biolab.si; search for SRSF3).

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Madara Ratnadiwakara

    Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7252-1823
  2. Stuart K Archer

    Bioinformatics Platform, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Craig I Dent

    School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Igor Ruiz de los Mozos

    The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4097-6422
  5. Traude H Beilharz

    Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Anja S Knaupp

    Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Christian M Nefzger

    Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Jose M Polo

    Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Minna-Liisa Anko

    Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
    For correspondence
    minni.anko@monash.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0446-3566

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council (GNT1043092)

  • Traude H Beilharz
  • Anja S Knaupp
  • Minna-Liisa Anko

Australian Research Council

  • Jose M Polo

Aatos and Jane Erkko Foundation

  • Minna-Liisa Anko

Sylvia and Charles Viertel Charitable Foundation

  • Jose M Polo

National Health and Medical Research Council (GNT1042851)

  • Traude H Beilharz
  • Anja S Knaupp
  • Minna-Liisa Anko

National Health and Medical Research Council (GNT1092280)

  • Traude H Beilharz
  • Anja S Knaupp
  • Minna-Liisa Anko

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Juan Valcárcel, Centre de Regulació Genòmica (CRG), Barcelona, Spain

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal work was performed in strict accordance with the Australian code for thecare and use of animals for scientific purposes (NHMRC) and the protocols were approved by the Monash University Animal Ethics Committee(MARP-2014-004).

Version history

  1. Received: April 10, 2018
  2. Accepted: May 5, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: May 9, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: May 22, 2018 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2018, Ratnadiwakara et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,892
    views
  • 498
    downloads
  • 43
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Madara Ratnadiwakara
  2. Stuart K Archer
  3. Craig I Dent
  4. Igor Ruiz de los Mozos
  5. Traude H Beilharz
  6. Anja S Knaupp
  7. Christian M Nefzger
  8. Jose M Polo
  9. Minna-Liisa Anko
(2018)
SRSF3 promotes pluripotency through Nanog mRNA export and coordination of the pluripotency gene expression program
eLife 7:e37419.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37419

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37419

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Miin S Lin, Se-Young Jo ... Vineet Bafna
    Research Article

    Extrachromosomal DNA is a common cause of oncogene amplification in cancer. The non-chromosomal inheritance of ecDNA enables tumors to rapidly evolve, contributing to treatment resistance and poor outcome for patients. The transcriptional context in which ecDNAs arise and progress, including chromosomally-driven transcription, is incompletely understood. We examined gene expression patterns of 870 tumors of varied histological types, to identify transcriptional correlates of ecDNA. Here, we show that ecDNA-containing tumors impact four major biological processes. Specifically, ecDNA-containing tumors up-regulate DNA damage and repair, cell cycle control, and mitotic processes, but down-regulate global immune regulation pathways. Taken together, these results suggest profound alterations in gene regulation in ecDNA-containing tumors, shedding light on molecular processes that give rise to their development and progression.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Mathew Thayer, Michael B Heskett ... Phillip A Yates
    Research Article

    ASARs are a family of very-long noncoding RNAs that control replication timing on individual human autosomes, and are essential for chromosome stability. The eight known ASAR lncRNAs remain closely associated with their parent chromosomes. Analysis of RNA-protein interaction data (from ENCODE) revealed numerous RBPs with significant interactions with multiple ASAR lncRNAs, with several hnRNPs as abundant interactors. An ~7 kb domain within the ASAR6-141 lncRNA shows a striking density of RBP interaction sites. Genetic deletion and ectopic integration assays indicate that this ~7 kb RNA binding protein domain contains functional sequences for controlling replication timing of entire chromosomes in cis. shRNA-mediated depletion of 10 different RNA binding proteins, including HNRNPA1, HNRNPC, HNRNPL, HNRNPM, HNRNPU, or HNRNPUL1, results in dissociation of ASAR lncRNAs from their chromosome territories, and disrupts the synchronous replication that occurs on all autosome pairs, recapitulating the effect of individual ASAR knockouts on a genome-wide scale. Our results further demonstrate the role that ASARs play during the temporal order of genome-wide replication, and we propose that ASARs function as essential RNA scaffolds for the assembly of hnRNP complexes that help maintain the structural integrity of each mammalian chromosome.