Cerebellar implementation of movement sequences through feedback

  1. Andrei Khilkevich  Is a corresponding author
  2. Juan Zambrano
  3. Molly-Marie Richards
  4. Michael Dean Mauk
  1. University of Texas at Austin, United States

Abstract

Most movements are not unitary, but are comprised of sequences. Although patients with cerebellar pathology display severe deficits in the execution and learning of sequences1,2, most of our understanding of cerebellar mechanisms has come from analyses of single component movements. Eyelid conditioning is a cerebellar-mediated behavior that provides the ability to control and restrict inputs to the cerebellum through stimulation of mossy fibers. We utilized this advantage to test directly how the cerebellum can learn a sequence of inter-connected movement components in rabbits. We show that the feedback signals from one component are sufficient to serve as a cue for the next component in the sequence. In vivo recordings from Purkinje cells demonstrated that all components of the sequence were encoded similarly by cerebellar cortex. These results provide a simple yet general framework for how the cerebellum can use simple associate learning processes to chain together a sequence of appropriately timed responses.

Data availability

All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Figures. Source data is provided for Figures 2-8.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Andrei Khilkevich

    Center for Learning and Memory, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States
    For correspondence
    khilkevich@utexas.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1876-4928
  2. Juan Zambrano

    Center for Learning and Memory, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Molly-Marie Richards

    Center for Learning and Memory, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Michael Dean Mauk

    Center for Learning and Memory, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

National Institute of Mental Health (MH 46904)

  • Michael Dean Mauk

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS 98308)

  • Michael Dean Mauk

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Indira M Raman, Northwestern University, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Treatment of animals and surgical procedures were in accordance with National Institutes of Health guidelines and an institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocol (#AUP-2015-00137) of the University of Texas at Austin. Every effort was made to minimize suffering.

Version history

  1. Received: April 11, 2018
  2. Accepted: July 28, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: July 31, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: August 23, 2018 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record updated: August 24, 2018 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2018, Khilkevich et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,896
    views
  • 436
    downloads
  • 28
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Andrei Khilkevich
  2. Juan Zambrano
  3. Molly-Marie Richards
  4. Michael Dean Mauk
(2018)
Cerebellar implementation of movement sequences through feedback
eLife 7:e37443.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37443

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37443

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    John J Stout, Allison E George ... Amy L Griffin
    Research Article

    Functional interactions between the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus, as revealed by strong oscillatory synchronization in the theta (6–11 Hz) frequency range, correlate with memory-guided decision-making. However, the degree to which this form of long-range synchronization influences memory-guided choice remains unclear. We developed a brain-machine interface that initiated task trials based on the magnitude of prefrontal-hippocampal theta synchronization, then measured choice outcomes. Trials initiated based on strong prefrontal-hippocampal theta synchrony were more likely to be correct compared to control trials on both working memory-dependent and -independent tasks. Prefrontal-thalamic neural interactions increased with prefrontal-hippocampal synchrony and optogenetic activation of the ventral midline thalamus primarily entrained prefrontal theta rhythms, but dynamically modulated synchrony. Together, our results show that prefrontal-hippocampal theta synchronization leads to a higher probability of a correct choice and strengthens prefrontal-thalamic dialogue. Our findings reveal new insights into the neural circuit dynamics underlying memory-guided choices and highlight a promising technique to potentiate cognitive processes or behavior via brain-machine interfacing.

    1. Neuroscience
    Tianhao Chu, Zilong Ji ... Si Wu
    Research Article

    Hippocampal place cells in freely moving rodents display both theta phase precession and procession, which is thought to play important roles in cognition, but the neural mechanism for producing theta phase shift remains largely unknown. Here, we show that firing rate adaptation within a continuous attractor neural network causes the neural activity bump to oscillate around the external input, resembling theta sweeps of decoded position during locomotion. These forward and backward sweeps naturally account for theta phase precession and procession of individual neurons, respectively. By tuning the adaptation strength, our model explains the difference between ‘bimodal cells’ showing interleaved phase precession and procession, and ‘unimodal cells’ in which phase precession predominates. Our model also explains the constant cycling of theta sweeps along different arms in a T-maze environment, the speed modulation of place cells’ firing frequency, and the continued phase shift after transient silencing of the hippocampus. We hope that this study will aid an understanding of the neural mechanism supporting theta phase coding in the brain.