The adhesion function of the sodium channel beta subunit (β1) contributes to cardiac action potential propagation

  1. Rengasayee Veeraraghavan  Is a corresponding author
  2. Gregory S Hoeker
  3. Anita Alvarez-Laviada
  4. Daniel Hoagland
  5. Xiaoping Wan
  6. D Ryan King
  7. Jose Sanchez-Alonso
  8. Chunling Chen
  9. Jane Jourdan
  10. Lori L Isom
  11. Isabelle Deschenes
  12. James Smyth
  13. Julia Gorelik
  14. Steven Poelzing
  15. Robert G Gourdie  Is a corresponding author
  1. Virginia Polytechnic University, United States
  2. Imperial College London, United Kingdom
  3. Case Western Reserve University, United States
  4. University of Michigan Medical School, United States

Abstract

Computational modeling indicates that cardiac conduction may involve ephaptic coupling - intercellular communication involving electrochemical signaling across narrow extracellular clefts between cardiomyocytes. We hypothesized that β1(SCN1B) - mediated adhesion scaffolds trans-activating NaV1.5 (SCN5A) channels within narrow (V1.5. Smart patch clamp (SPC) indicated greater sodium current density (INa) at perinexi, relative to non-junctional sites. A novel, rationally designed peptide, βadp1, potently and selectively inhibited β1-mediated adhesion, in electric cell-substrate impedance sensing studies. βadp1 significantly widened perinexi in guinea pig ventricles, and selectively reduced perinexal INa, but not whole cell INa, in myocyte monolayers. In optical mapping studies, βadp1 precipitated arrhythmogenic conduction slowing. In summary, β1-mediated adhesion at the perinexus facilitates action potential propagation between cardiomyocytes, and may represent a novel target for anti-arrhythmic therapies.

Data availability

The raw data generated in this study is available via Dryad (doi:10.5061/dryad.10351qn). The raw STORM movies are available on request from the corresponding author due to their large size.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Rengasayee Veeraraghavan

    Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Virginia Polytechnic University, Roanoke, United States
    For correspondence
    saiv@vt.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8364-2222
  2. Gregory S Hoeker

    Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Virginia Polytechnic University, Roanoke, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Anita Alvarez-Laviada

    Department of Myocardial Function, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Daniel Hoagland

    Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Virginia Polytechnic University, Roanoke, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Xiaoping Wan

    Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. D Ryan King

    Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Virginia Polytechnic University, Roanoke, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Jose Sanchez-Alonso

    Department of Myocardial Function, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Chunling Chen

    Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Jane Jourdan

    Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Virginia Polytechnic University, Roanoke, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Lori L Isom

    Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Isabelle Deschenes

    Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. James Smyth

    Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Virginia Polytechnic University, Roanoke, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Julia Gorelik

    Department of Myocardial Function, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Steven Poelzing

    Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Virginia Polytechnic University, Roanoke, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Robert G Gourdie

    Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Virginia Polytechnic University, Roanoke, United States
    For correspondence
    gourdier@vtc.vt.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6021-0796

Funding

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (RO1 HL56728-15A2)

  • Robert G Gourdie

American Heart Association (16SDG29870007)

  • Rengasayee Veeraraghavan

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01 HL102298-01A1)

  • Steven Poelzing

National Institutes of Health (R01 HL102298-01A1)

  • James Smyth

National Institutes of Health (R37NS076752)

  • Lori L Isom

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (RO1 HL HL141855-01)

  • Robert G Gourdie

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (RO1 HL HL141855-01)

  • Steven Poelzing

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: The investigation conforms to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH Publication No. 85-23, revised 1996). All animal study protocols (15-130, 15-134, 12-140) were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the Virginia Polytechnic University.

Copyright

© 2018, Veeraraghavan et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,380
    views
  • 467
    downloads
  • 100
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Rengasayee Veeraraghavan
  2. Gregory S Hoeker
  3. Anita Alvarez-Laviada
  4. Daniel Hoagland
  5. Xiaoping Wan
  6. D Ryan King
  7. Jose Sanchez-Alonso
  8. Chunling Chen
  9. Jane Jourdan
  10. Lori L Isom
  11. Isabelle Deschenes
  12. James Smyth
  13. Julia Gorelik
  14. Steven Poelzing
  15. Robert G Gourdie
(2018)
The adhesion function of the sodium channel beta subunit (β1) contributes to cardiac action potential propagation
eLife 7:e37610.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37610

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37610

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Fatima Tleiss, Martina Montanari ... C Leopold Kurz
    Research Article

    Multiple gut antimicrobial mechanisms are coordinated in space and time to efficiently fight foodborne pathogens. In Drosophila melanogaster, production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) together with intestinal cell renewal play a key role in eliminating gut microbes. A complementary mechanism would be to isolate and treat pathogenic bacteria while allowing colonization by commensals. Using real-time imaging to follow the fate of ingested bacteria, we demonstrate that while commensal Lactiplantibacillus plantarum freely circulate within the intestinal lumen, pathogenic strains such as Erwinia carotovora or Bacillus thuringiensis, are blocked in the anterior midgut where they are rapidly eliminated by antimicrobial peptides. This sequestration of pathogenic bacteria in the anterior midgut requires the Duox enzyme in enterocytes, and both TrpA1 and Dh31 in enteroendocrine cells. Supplementing larval food with hCGRP, the human homolog of Dh31, is sufficient to block the bacteria, suggesting the existence of a conserved mechanism. While the immune deficiency (IMD) pathway is essential for eliminating the trapped bacteria, it is dispensable for the blockage. Genetic manipulations impairing bacterial compartmentalization result in abnormal colonization of posterior midgut regions by pathogenic bacteria. Despite a functional IMD pathway, this ectopic colonization leads to bacterial proliferation and larval death, demonstrating the critical role of bacteria anterior sequestration in larval defense. Our study reveals a temporal orchestration during which pathogenic bacteria, but not innocuous, are confined in the anterior part of the midgut in which they are eliminated in an IMD-pathway-dependent manner.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Kourosh Hayatigolkhatmi, Chiara Soriani ... Simona Rodighiero
    Tools and Resources

    Understanding the cell cycle at the single-cell level is crucial for cellular biology and cancer research. While current methods using fluorescent markers have improved the study of adherent cells, non-adherent cells remain challenging. In this study, we addressed this gap by combining a specialized surface to enhance cell attachment, the FUCCI(CA)2 sensor, an automated image analysis pipeline, and a custom machine learning algorithm. This approach enabled precise measurement of cell cycle phase durations in non-adherent cells. This method was validated in acute myeloid leukemia cell lines NB4 and Kasumi-1, which have unique cell cycle characteristics, and we tested the impact of cell cycle-modulating drugs on NB4 cells. Our cell cycle analysis system, which is also compatible with adherent cells, is fully automated and freely available, providing detailed insights from hundreds of cells under various conditions. This report presents a valuable tool for advancing cancer research and drug development by enabling comprehensive, automated cell cycle analysis in both adherent and non-adherent cells.