Effects of spinal cord stimulation on postural control in Parkinson's disease patients with freezing of gait

Abstract

Freezing of gait (FoG) in Parkinson's disease (PD) is an incapacitating transient phenomenon, followed by continuous postural disorders. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a promising intervention for FoG in patients with PD, however its effects on distinct domains of postural control is not well known. The aim of this study is to assess the effects of SCS on FoG and distinct domains of postural control. Four patients with FoG were implanted with SCS systems in the upper thoracic spine. Anticipatory postural adjustment (APA), reactive postural responses, gait and FoG were biomechanically assessed. In general, the results showed that SCS improved FoG and APA. However, SCS failed to improve reactive postural responses. SCS seems to influence cortical motor circuits, involving the supplementary motor area. On the other hand, reactive posture control to external perturbation that mainly relies on neuronal circuitries involving the brainstem and spinal cord, is less influenced by SCS.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for Figures 1 and 2.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Andrea Cristina de Lima-Pardini

    Centre of Mathematics, Computation and Cognition, Federal University of ABC, São Bernardo do Campo, Brazil
    For correspondence
    andrea.cristina@ufabc.edu.br
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Daniel Boari Coelho

    Human Motor Systems Laboratory, School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
    For correspondence
    daniel.boari@ufabc.edu.br
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8758-6507
  3. Carolina Pinto Souza

    Department of Neurology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Carolina Oliveira Souza

    Department of Neurology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Maria Gabriela dos Santos Ghilardi

    Department of Neurology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Tiago Garcia

    Department of Neurology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Mariana Voos

    Department of Physical Therapy, Speech and Occupational Therapy, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Matija Milosevic

    Department of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Clement Hamani

    Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Luis Augusto Teixeira

    Human Motor Systems Laboratory, School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Erich Talamoni Fonoff

    Department of Neurology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
    For correspondence
    fonoffet@usp.br
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Hospital das Clinicas, University of São Paulo Medical School

  • Erich Talamoni Fonoff

Brazilian Council of Science and Technology

  • Luis Augusto Teixeira

São Paulo Research Foundation

  • Luis Augusto Teixeira

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Amol Yadav, Duke University

Ethics

Human subjects: The study was approved by the department review board and in the ethics committee atHospital das Clinicas of University of São Paulo and registered in the national clinicalresearch database (CAPPESQ-HCFMUSP #12690213.0.0000.0068), which requires allparticipants to be previously instructed about the procedures and to give written informedconsent prior to study inclusion. Patients included in the present study participated in theclinical trial also registered in the clinicaltrials.gov (#NCT02388204). All experiments wereperformed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki

Version history

  1. Received: April 19, 2018
  2. Accepted: July 28, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: August 2, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: August 14, 2018 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2018, de Lima-Pardini et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,414
    views
  • 422
    downloads
  • 39
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Andrea Cristina de Lima-Pardini
  2. Daniel Boari Coelho
  3. Carolina Pinto Souza
  4. Carolina Oliveira Souza
  5. Maria Gabriela dos Santos Ghilardi
  6. Tiago Garcia
  7. Mariana Voos
  8. Matija Milosevic
  9. Clement Hamani
  10. Luis Augusto Teixeira
  11. Erich Talamoni Fonoff
(2018)
Effects of spinal cord stimulation on postural control in Parkinson's disease patients with freezing of gait
eLife 7:e37727.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37727

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37727

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Vezha Boboeva, Alberto Pezzotta ... Athena Akrami
    Research Article

    The central tendency bias, or contraction bias, is a phenomenon where the judgment of the magnitude of items held in working memory appears to be biased toward the average of past observations. It is assumed to be an optimal strategy by the brain and commonly thought of as an expression of the brain’s ability to learn the statistical structure of sensory input. On the other hand, recency biases such as serial dependence are also commonly observed and are thought to reflect the content of working memory. Recent results from an auditory delayed comparison task in rats suggest that both biases may be more related than previously thought: when the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) was silenced, both short-term and contraction biases were reduced. By proposing a model of the circuit that may be involved in generating the behavior, we show that a volatile working memory content susceptible to shifting to the past sensory experience – producing short-term sensory history biases – naturally leads to contraction bias. The errors, occurring at the level of individual trials, are sampled from the full distribution of the stimuli and are not due to a gradual shift of the memory toward the sensory distribution’s mean. Our results are consistent with a broad set of behavioral findings and provide predictions of performance across different stimulus distributions and timings, delay intervals, as well as neuronal dynamics in putative working memory areas. Finally, we validate our model by performing a set of human psychophysics experiments of an auditory parametric working memory task.

    1. Neuroscience
    Michael Berger, Michèle Fraatz ... Henrike Scholz
    Research Article

    The brain regulates food intake in response to internal energy demands and food availability. However, can internal energy storage influence the type of memory that is formed? We show that the duration of starvation determines whether Drosophila melanogaster forms appetitive short-term or longer-lasting intermediate memories. The internal glycogen storage in the muscles and adipose tissue influences how intensely sucrose-associated information is stored. Insulin-like signaling in octopaminergic reward neurons integrates internal energy storage into memory formation. Octopamine, in turn, suppresses the formation of long-term memory. Octopamine is not required for short-term memory because octopamine-deficient mutants can form appetitive short-term memory for sucrose and to other nutrients depending on the internal energy status. The reduced positive reinforcing effect of sucrose at high internal glycogen levels, combined with the increased stability of food-related memories due to prolonged periods of starvation, could lead to increased food intake.