Spatial patterning of liver progenitor cell differentiation mediated by cellular contractility and Notch signaling

Abstract

The progenitor cells of the developing liver can differentiate toward both hepatocyte and biliary cell fates. In addition to the established roles of TGFβ and Notch signaling in this fate specification process, there is increasing evidence that liver progenitors are sensitive to mechanical cues. Here, we utilized microarrayed patterns to provide a controlled biochemical and biomechanical microenvironment for mouse liver progenitor cell differentiation. In these defined circular geometries, we observed biliary differentiation at the periphery and hepatocytic differentiation in the center. Parallel measurements obtained by traction force microscopy showed substantial stresses at the periphery, coincident with maximal biliary differentiation. We investigated the impact of downstream signaling, showing that peripheral biliary differentiation is dependent not only on Notch and TGFβ but also E-cadherin, myosin-mediated cell contractility, and ERK. We have therefore identified distinct combinations of microenvironmental cues which guide fate specification of mouse liver progenitors toward both hepatocyte and biliary fates.

Data availability

Source data tables (9 total) for the immunofluorescence and TFM array experiments have been attached to this submission and are associated with the relevant figures. Source code files (11 total) have been uploaded for the TFM analysis (Figure 4-6), FEM simulations (Figure 4), and Notch simulations (Figure 5). A detailed protocol for our array analysis technique together with source code has been made available elsewhere, see Kaylan et al. (J Vis Exp, 2017, e55362, http://dx.doi.org/10.3791/55362).

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Kerim B Kaylan

    Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7147-0614
  2. Ian C Berg

    Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Matthew J Biehl

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Aidan Brougham-Cook

    Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Ishita Jain

    Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Sameed M Jamil

    Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Lauren H Sargeant

    Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Nicholas J Cornell

    Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Lori T Raetzman

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Gregory H Underhill

    Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, United States
    For correspondence
    gunderhi@illinois.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1002-5335

Funding

National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (5R03EB022254-02)

  • Gregory H Underhill

National Science Foundation (1636175)

  • Gregory H Underhill

National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (T32EB019944)

  • Ian C Berg

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Copyright

© 2018, Kaylan et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,453
    views
  • 435
    downloads
  • 35
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Kerim B Kaylan
  2. Ian C Berg
  3. Matthew J Biehl
  4. Aidan Brougham-Cook
  5. Ishita Jain
  6. Sameed M Jamil
  7. Lauren H Sargeant
  8. Nicholas J Cornell
  9. Lori T Raetzman
  10. Gregory H Underhill
(2018)
Spatial patterning of liver progenitor cell differentiation mediated by cellular contractility and Notch signaling
eLife 7:e38536.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.38536

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.38536

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Sarah Y Coomson, Salil A Lachke
    Insight

    A study in mice reveals key interactions between proteins involved in fibroblast growth factor signaling and how they contribute to distinct stages of eye lens development.

    1. Developmental Biology
    Jing Lu, Hao Xu ... Kai Lei
    Tools and Resources

    The intricate coordination of the neural network in planarian growth and regeneration has remained largely unrevealed, partly due to the challenges of imaging the CNS in three dimensions (3D) with high resolution and within a reasonable timeframe. To address this gap in systematic imaging of the CNS in planarians, we adopted high-resolution, nanoscale imaging by combining tissue expansion and tiling light-sheet microscopy, achieving up to fourfold linear expansion. Using an automatic 3D cell segmentation pipeline, we quantitatively profiled neurons and muscle fibers at the single-cell level in over 400 wild-type planarians during homeostasis and regeneration. We validated previous observations of neuronal cell number changes and muscle fiber distribution. We found that the increase in neuron cell number tends to lag behind the rapid expansion of somatic cells during the later phase of homeostasis. By imaging the planarian with up to 120 nm resolution, we also observed distinct muscle distribution patterns at the anterior and posterior poles. Furthermore, we investigated the effects of β-catenin-1 RNAi on muscle fiber distribution at the posterior pole, consistent with changes in anterior-posterior polarity. The glial cells were observed to be close in contact with dorsal-ventral muscle fibers. Finally, we observed disruptions in neural-muscular networks in inr-1 RNAi planarians. These findings provide insights into the detailed structure and potential functions of the neural-muscular system in planarians and highlight the accessibility of our imaging tool in unraveling the biological functions underlying their diverse phenotypes and behaviors.