Generation of a versatile BiFC ORFeome library for analyzing protein-protein interactions in live Drosophila

  1. Johannes Bischof
  2. Marilyne Duffraisse
  3. Edy Furger
  4. Leiore Ajuria
  5. Guillaume Giraud
  6. Solene Vanderperre
  7. Rachel Paul
  8. Mikael Björklund
  9. Damien Ahr
  10. Alexis W Ahmed
  11. Lionel Spinelli
  12. Christine Brun
  13. Konrad Basler
  14. Samir Merabet  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Zurich, Switzerland
  2. Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, France
  3. Zhejiang University, China
  4. Aix Marseille University, France

Abstract

Transcription factors achieve specificity by establishing intricate interaction networks that will change depending on the cell context. Capturing these interactions in live condition is however a challenging issue that requires sensitive and non-invasive methods. We present a set of fly lines, called 'multicolor BiFC library', which covers most of the Drosophila transcription factors for performing Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC). The multicolor BiFC library can be used to probe two different binary interactions simultaneously and is compatible for large-scale interaction screens. The library can also be coupled with established Drosophila genetic resources to analyze interactions in the developmentally relevant expression domain of each protein partner. We provide proof of principle experiments of these various applications, using Hox proteins in the live Drosophila embryo as a case study. Overall this novel collection of ready-to-use fly lines constitutes an unprecedented genetic toolbox for the identification and analysis of protein-protein interactions in vivo.

Data availability

Fly lines generated for the project have been deposited to the FlyORF library and are available upon request to FlyORF (https://flyorf.ch/index.php/orf-collection). The numerical, processed data used for this study is provided in the manuscript, figures and supplementary files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Johannes Bischof

    Institute of Molecular Life Sciences, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    Johannes Bischof, involved in maintaining and distributing the fly lines via the not-for-profit FlyORF project. There are no other competing interests to declare.
  2. Marilyne Duffraisse

    ENS Lyon UMR5242, Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, Lyon, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Edy Furger

    Institute of Molecular Life Sciences, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Leiore Ajuria

    ENS Lyon UMR5242, Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, Lyon, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Guillaume Giraud

    ENS Lyon UMR5242, Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, Lyon, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Solene Vanderperre

    ENS Lyon UMR5242, Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, Lyon, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Rachel Paul

    ENS Lyon UMR5242, Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, Lyon, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Mikael Björklund

    Zhejiang University-University of Edinburgh Institute, Zhejiang University, Haining, China
    Competing interests
    Mikael Björklund, involved in the development of the FlyORF resource. There are no other competing interests to declare.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2176-681X
  9. Damien Ahr

    ENS Lyon UMR5242, Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, Lyon, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Alexis W Ahmed

    ENS Lyon UMR5242, Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, Lyon, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Lionel Spinelli

    TAGC U1090, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Christine Brun

    TAGC U1090, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5563-6765
  13. Konrad Basler

    Institute of Molecular Life Sciences, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    Konrad Basler, involved in maintaining and distributing the fly lines via the not-for-profit FlyORF project. There are no other competing interests to declare.
  14. Samir Merabet

    ENS Lyon UMR5242, Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, Lyon, France
    For correspondence
    samir.merabet@ens-lyon.fr
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7629-703X

Funding

Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (1122556)

  • Johannes Bischof
  • Marilyne Duffraisse
  • Edy Furger
  • Leiore Ajuria
  • Guillaume Giraud
  • Solene Vanderperre
  • Rachel Paul
  • Samir Merabet

Cefipra

  • Johannes Bischof
  • Marilyne Duffraisse
  • Edy Furger
  • Leiore Ajuria
  • Guillaume Giraud
  • Solene Vanderperre
  • Rachel Paul
  • Samir Merabet

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. K VijayRaghavan, National Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, India

Version history

  1. Received: June 1, 2018
  2. Accepted: September 18, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: September 24, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: October 9, 2018 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2018, Bischof et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,288
    views
  • 820
    downloads
  • 32
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Johannes Bischof
  2. Marilyne Duffraisse
  3. Edy Furger
  4. Leiore Ajuria
  5. Guillaume Giraud
  6. Solene Vanderperre
  7. Rachel Paul
  8. Mikael Björklund
  9. Damien Ahr
  10. Alexis W Ahmed
  11. Lionel Spinelli
  12. Christine Brun
  13. Konrad Basler
  14. Samir Merabet
(2018)
Generation of a versatile BiFC ORFeome library for analyzing protein-protein interactions in live Drosophila
eLife 7:e38853.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.38853

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.38853

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Neuroscience
    Bohan Zhu, Richard I Ainsworth ... Javier González-Maeso
    Research Article

    Genome-wide association studies have revealed >270 loci associated with schizophrenia risk, yet these genetic factors do not seem to be sufficient to fully explain the molecular determinants behind this psychiatric condition. Epigenetic marks such as post-translational histone modifications remain largely plastic during development and adulthood, allowing a dynamic impact of environmental factors, including antipsychotic medications, on access to genes and regulatory elements. However, few studies so far have profiled cell-specific genome-wide histone modifications in postmortem brain samples from schizophrenia subjects, or the effect of antipsychotic treatment on such epigenetic marks. Here, we conducted ChIP-seq analyses focusing on histone marks indicative of active enhancers (H3K27ac) and active promoters (H3K4me3), alongside RNA-seq, using frontal cortex samples from antipsychotic-free (AF) and antipsychotic-treated (AT) individuals with schizophrenia, as well as individually matched controls (n=58). Schizophrenia subjects exhibited thousands of neuronal and non-neuronal epigenetic differences at regions that included several susceptibility genetic loci, such as NRG1, DISC1, and DRD3. By analyzing the AF and AT cohorts separately, we identified schizophrenia-associated alterations in specific transcription factors, their regulatees, and epigenomic and transcriptomic features that were reversed by antipsychotic treatment; as well as those that represented a consequence of antipsychotic medication rather than a hallmark of schizophrenia in postmortem human brain samples. Notably, we also found that the effect of age on epigenomic landscapes was more pronounced in frontal cortex of AT-schizophrenics, as compared to AF-schizophrenics and controls. Together, these data provide important evidence of epigenetic alterations in the frontal cortex of individuals with schizophrenia, and remark for the first time on the impact of age and antipsychotic treatment on chromatin organization.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Kevin Nuno, Armon Azizi ... Ravindra Majeti
    Research Article

    Relapse of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is highly aggressive and often treatment refractory. We analyzed previously published AML relapse cohorts and found that 40% of relapses occur without changes in driver mutations, suggesting that non-genetic mechanisms drive relapse in a large proportion of cases. We therefore characterized epigenetic patterns of AML relapse using 26 matched diagnosis-relapse samples with ATAC-seq. This analysis identified a relapse-specific chromatin accessibility signature for mutationally stable AML, suggesting that AML undergoes epigenetic evolution at relapse independent of mutational changes. Analysis of leukemia stem cell (LSC) chromatin changes at relapse indicated that this leukemic compartment underwent significantly less epigenetic evolution than non-LSCs, while epigenetic changes in non-LSCs reflected overall evolution of the bulk leukemia. Finally, we used single-cell ATAC-seq paired with mitochondrial sequencing (mtscATAC) to map clones from diagnosis into relapse along with their epigenetic features. We found that distinct mitochondrially-defined clones exhibit more similar chromatin accessibility at relapse relative to diagnosis, demonstrating convergent epigenetic evolution in relapsed AML. These results demonstrate that epigenetic evolution is a feature of relapsed AML and that convergent epigenetic evolution can occur following treatment with induction chemotherapy.