Abstract

High-grade serous ovarian cancer is characterized by extensive copy number alterations, among which the amplification of MYC oncogene occurs in nearly half of tumors. We demonstrate that ovarian cancer cells highly depend on MYC for maintaining their oncogenic growth, indicating MYC as a therapeutic target for this difficult-to-treat malignancy. However, targeting MYC directly has proven difficult. We screen small molecules targeting transcriptional and epigenetic regulation, and find that THZ1 - a chemical inhibiting CDK7, CDK12, and CDK13 - markedly downregulates MYC. Notably, abolishing MYC expression cannot be achieved by targeting CDK7 alone, but require the combined inhibition of CDK7, CDK12, and CDK13. In 11 patient derived xenografts models derived from heavily pre-treated ovarian cancer patients, administration of THZ1 induces significant tumor growth inhibition with concurrent abrogation of MYC expression. Our study indicates that targeting these transcriptional CDKs with agents such as THZ1 may be an effective approach for MYC-dependent ovarian malignancies.

Data availability

RNA sequencing data have been deposited in GEO under accession code GSE116282.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Mei Zeng

    Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Nicholas P Kwiatkowski

    Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    Nicholas P Kwiatkowski, is an inventor on a patent application covering THZ1 (patent application number WO/2014/063068 A1), which is licensed to Syros Pharmaceuticals.
  3. Tinghu Zhang

    Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    Tinghu Zhang, is an inventor on a patent application covering THZ1 (patent application number WO/2014/063068 A1), which is licensed to Syros Pharmaceuticals.
  4. Behnam Nabet

    Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6738-4200
  5. Mousheng Xu

    Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Yanke Liang

    Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Chunshan Quan

    Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Jinhua Wang

    Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Mingfeng Hao

    Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Sangeetha Palakurthi

    Belfer Institute for Applied Cancer Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Shan Zhou

    Belfer Institute for Applied Cancer Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Qing Zeng

    Belfer Institute for Applied Cancer Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Paul T Kirschmeier

    Belfer Institute for Applied Cancer Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Khyati Meghani

    Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Alan L Leggett

    Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. Jun Qi

    Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  17. Geoffrey I Shapiro

    Early Drug Development Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  18. Joyce F Liu

    Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  19. Ursula A Matulonis

    Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  20. Charles Y Lin

    Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    For correspondence
    Charles.Y.Lin@bcm.edu
    Competing interests
    Charles Y Lin, is a consultant of Jnana Therapeutics and is a shareholder and inventor of IP licensed to Syros Pharmaceuticals.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9155-090X
  21. Panagiotis A Konstantinopoulos

    Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    Panagiotis_Konstantinopoulos@DFCI.HARVARD.EDU
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  22. Nathanael S Gray

    Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    nathanael_gray@dfci.harvard.edu
    Competing interests
    Nathanael S Gray, is an inventor on a patent application covering THZ1 (patent application number WO/2014/063068 A1), which is licensed to Syros Pharmaceuticals.Is a scientific founder and equity holder of Syros Pharmaceuticals, C4 Therapeutics, Petra Pharma, Gatekeeper Pharmaceuticals, and Soltego.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5354-7403

Funding

National Cancer Institute (NIH R01 CA197336-02)

  • Nathanael S Gray

National Cancer Institute (NIH R01 CA179483-02)

  • Nathanael S Gray

U.S. Department of Defense (W81XWH-14-OCRP-OCACAOC140632 award)

  • Panagiotis A Konstantinopoulos

Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas (RR150093)

  • Charles Y Lin

National Cancer Institute (R01CA215452-01)

  • Charles Y Lin

American Cancer Society (Postdoctoral Fellowship PF-17-010-01-CDD)

  • Behnam Nabet

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Ross L Levine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the animal use guidelines from the NIH and with protocols (Protocol # 11-044) approved by the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Animal Care and Use Committee. Full details are described in Materials and Methods - Animal Studies.

Version history

  1. Received: June 8, 2018
  2. Accepted: November 11, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: November 13, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: November 23, 2018 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2018, Zeng et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,720
    views
  • 1,058
    downloads
  • 94
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Mei Zeng
  2. Nicholas P Kwiatkowski
  3. Tinghu Zhang
  4. Behnam Nabet
  5. Mousheng Xu
  6. Yanke Liang
  7. Chunshan Quan
  8. Jinhua Wang
  9. Mingfeng Hao
  10. Sangeetha Palakurthi
  11. Shan Zhou
  12. Qing Zeng
  13. Paul T Kirschmeier
  14. Khyati Meghani
  15. Alan L Leggett
  16. Jun Qi
  17. Geoffrey I Shapiro
  18. Joyce F Liu
  19. Ursula A Matulonis
  20. Charles Y Lin
  21. Panagiotis A Konstantinopoulos
  22. Nathanael S Gray
(2018)
Targeting MYC dependency in ovarian cancer through inhibition of CDK7 and CDK12/13
eLife 7:e39030.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.39030

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.39030

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Kevin Nuno, Armon Azizi ... Ravindra Majeti
    Research Article

    Relapse of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is highly aggressive and often treatment refractory. We analyzed previously published AML relapse cohorts and found that 40% of relapses occur without changes in driver mutations, suggesting that non-genetic mechanisms drive relapse in a large proportion of cases. We therefore characterized epigenetic patterns of AML relapse using 26 matched diagnosis-relapse samples with ATAC-seq. This analysis identified a relapse-specific chromatin accessibility signature for mutationally stable AML, suggesting that AML undergoes epigenetic evolution at relapse independent of mutational changes. Analysis of leukemia stem cell (LSC) chromatin changes at relapse indicated that this leukemic compartment underwent significantly less epigenetic evolution than non-LSCs, while epigenetic changes in non-LSCs reflected overall evolution of the bulk leukemia. Finally, we used single-cell ATAC-seq paired with mitochondrial sequencing (mtscATAC) to map clones from diagnosis into relapse along with their epigenetic features. We found that distinct mitochondrially-defined clones exhibit more similar chromatin accessibility at relapse relative to diagnosis, demonstrating convergent epigenetic evolution in relapsed AML. These results demonstrate that epigenetic evolution is a feature of relapsed AML and that convergent epigenetic evolution can occur following treatment with induction chemotherapy.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Ibtisam Ibtisam, Alexei F Kisselev
    Short Report

    Rapid recovery of proteasome activity may contribute to intrinsic and acquired resistance to FDA-approved proteasome inhibitors. Previous studies have demonstrated that the expression of proteasome genes in cells treated with sub-lethal concentrations of proteasome inhibitors is upregulated by the transcription factor Nrf1 (NFE2L1), which is activated by a DDI2 protease. Here, we demonstrate that the recovery of proteasome activity is DDI2-independent and occurs before transcription of proteasomal genes is upregulated but requires protein translation. Thus, mammalian cells possess an additional DDI2 and transcription-independent pathway for the rapid recovery of proteasome activity after proteasome inhibition.