Abstract

High-grade serous ovarian cancer is characterized by extensive copy number alterations, among which the amplification of MYC oncogene occurs in nearly half of tumors. We demonstrate that ovarian cancer cells highly depend on MYC for maintaining their oncogenic growth, indicating MYC as a therapeutic target for this difficult-to-treat malignancy. However, targeting MYC directly has proven difficult. We screen small molecules targeting transcriptional and epigenetic regulation, and find that THZ1 - a chemical inhibiting CDK7, CDK12, and CDK13 - markedly downregulates MYC. Notably, abolishing MYC expression cannot be achieved by targeting CDK7 alone, but require the combined inhibition of CDK7, CDK12, and CDK13. In 11 patient derived xenografts models derived from heavily pre-treated ovarian cancer patients, administration of THZ1 induces significant tumor growth inhibition with concurrent abrogation of MYC expression. Our study indicates that targeting these transcriptional CDKs with agents such as THZ1 may be an effective approach for MYC-dependent ovarian malignancies.

Data availability

RNA sequencing data have been deposited in GEO under accession code GSE116282.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Mei Zeng

    Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Nicholas P Kwiatkowski

    Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    Nicholas P Kwiatkowski, is an inventor on a patent application covering THZ1 (patent application number WO/2014/063068 A1), which is licensed to Syros Pharmaceuticals.
  3. Tinghu Zhang

    Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    Tinghu Zhang, is an inventor on a patent application covering THZ1 (patent application number WO/2014/063068 A1), which is licensed to Syros Pharmaceuticals.
  4. Behnam Nabet

    Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6738-4200
  5. Mousheng Xu

    Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Yanke Liang

    Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Chunshan Quan

    Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Jinhua Wang

    Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Mingfeng Hao

    Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Sangeetha Palakurthi

    Belfer Institute for Applied Cancer Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Shan Zhou

    Belfer Institute for Applied Cancer Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Qing Zeng

    Belfer Institute for Applied Cancer Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Paul T Kirschmeier

    Belfer Institute for Applied Cancer Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Khyati Meghani

    Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Alan L Leggett

    Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. Jun Qi

    Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  17. Geoffrey I Shapiro

    Early Drug Development Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  18. Joyce F Liu

    Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  19. Ursula A Matulonis

    Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  20. Charles Y Lin

    Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    For correspondence
    Charles.Y.Lin@bcm.edu
    Competing interests
    Charles Y Lin, is a consultant of Jnana Therapeutics and is a shareholder and inventor of IP licensed to Syros Pharmaceuticals.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9155-090X
  21. Panagiotis A Konstantinopoulos

    Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    Panagiotis_Konstantinopoulos@DFCI.HARVARD.EDU
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  22. Nathanael S Gray

    Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    nathanael_gray@dfci.harvard.edu
    Competing interests
    Nathanael S Gray, is an inventor on a patent application covering THZ1 (patent application number WO/2014/063068 A1), which is licensed to Syros Pharmaceuticals.Is a scientific founder and equity holder of Syros Pharmaceuticals, C4 Therapeutics, Petra Pharma, Gatekeeper Pharmaceuticals, and Soltego.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5354-7403

Funding

National Cancer Institute (NIH R01 CA197336-02)

  • Nathanael S Gray

National Cancer Institute (NIH R01 CA179483-02)

  • Nathanael S Gray

U.S. Department of Defense (W81XWH-14-OCRP-OCACAOC140632 award)

  • Panagiotis A Konstantinopoulos

Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas (RR150093)

  • Charles Y Lin

National Cancer Institute (R01CA215452-01)

  • Charles Y Lin

American Cancer Society (Postdoctoral Fellowship PF-17-010-01-CDD)

  • Behnam Nabet

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the animal use guidelines from the NIH and with protocols (Protocol # 11-044) approved by the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Animal Care and Use Committee. Full details are described in Materials and Methods - Animal Studies.

Copyright

© 2018, Zeng et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 6,082
    views
  • 1,106
    downloads
  • 111
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Mei Zeng
  2. Nicholas P Kwiatkowski
  3. Tinghu Zhang
  4. Behnam Nabet
  5. Mousheng Xu
  6. Yanke Liang
  7. Chunshan Quan
  8. Jinhua Wang
  9. Mingfeng Hao
  10. Sangeetha Palakurthi
  11. Shan Zhou
  12. Qing Zeng
  13. Paul T Kirschmeier
  14. Khyati Meghani
  15. Alan L Leggett
  16. Jun Qi
  17. Geoffrey I Shapiro
  18. Joyce F Liu
  19. Ursula A Matulonis
  20. Charles Y Lin
  21. Panagiotis A Konstantinopoulos
  22. Nathanael S Gray
(2018)
Targeting MYC dependency in ovarian cancer through inhibition of CDK7 and CDK12/13
eLife 7:e39030.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.39030

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.39030

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Alison G Barber, Cynthia M Quintero ... Tannishtha Reya
    Research Article

    Despite advances in therapeutic approaches, lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related deaths. To understand the molecular programs underlying lung cancer initiation and maintenance, we focused on stem cell programs that are normally extinguished with differentiation but can be reactivated during oncogenesis. Here, we have used extensive genetic modeling and patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) to identify a dual role for Msi2: as a signal that acts initially to sensitize cells to transformation, and subsequently to drive tumor propagation. Using Msi reporter mice, we found that Msi2-expressing cells were marked by a pro-oncogenic landscape and a preferential ability to respond to Ras and p53 mutations. Consistent with this, genetic deletion of Msi2 in an autochthonous Ras/p53-driven lung cancer model resulted in a marked reduction of tumor burden, delayed progression, and a doubling of median survival. Additionally, this dependency was conserved in human disease as inhibition of Msi2 impaired tumor growth in PDXs. Mechanistically, Msi2 triggered a broad range of pathways critical for tumor growth, including several novel effectors of lung adenocarcinoma. Collectively, these findings reveal a critical role for Msi2 in aggressive lung adenocarcinoma, lend new insight into the biology of this disease, and identify potential new therapeutic targets.

    1. Cancer Biology
    Rui Vasco Simoes, Rafael Neto Henriques ... Noam Shemesh
    Research Article

    Glioblastomas are aggressive brain tumors with dismal prognosis. One of the main bottlenecks for developing more effective therapies for glioblastoma stems from their histologic and molecular heterogeneity, leading to distinct tumor microenvironments and disease phenotypes. Effectively characterizing these features would improve the clinical management of glioblastoma. Glucose flux rates through glycolysis and mitochondrial oxidation have been recently shown to quantitatively depict glioblastoma proliferation in mouse models (GL261 and CT2A tumors) using dynamic glucose-enhanced (DGE) deuterium spectroscopy. However, the spatial features of tumor microenvironment phenotypes remain hitherto unresolved. Here, we develop a DGE Deuterium Metabolic Imaging (DMI) approach for profiling tumor microenvironments through glucose conversion kinetics. Using a multimodal combination of tumor mouse models, novel strategies for spectroscopic imaging and noise attenuation, and histopathological correlations, we show that tumor lactate turnover mirrors phenotype differences between GL261 and CT2A mouse glioblastoma, whereas recycling of the peritumoral glutamate-glutamine pool is a potential marker of invasion capacity in pooled cohorts, linked to secondary brain lesions. These findings were validated by histopathological characterization of each tumor, including cell density and proliferation, peritumoral invasion and distant migration, and immune cell infiltration. Our study bodes well for precision neuro-oncology, highlighting the importance of mapping glucose flux rates to better understand the metabolic heterogeneity of glioblastoma and its links to disease phenotypes.