Integrated externally and internally generated task predictions Jointly guide cognitive control in prefrontal cortex

  1. Jiefeng Jiang  Is a corresponding author
  2. Anthony D Wagner
  3. Tobias Egner
  1. Stanford University, United States
  2. Duke University, United States

Abstract

Cognitive control proactively configures information processing to suit expected task demands. Predictions of forthcoming demand can be driven by explicit external cues or be generated internally, based on past experience (cognitive history). However, it is not known whether and how the brain reconciles these two sources of information to guide control. Pairing a probabilistic task-switching paradigm with computational modeling, we found that external and internally generated predictions jointly guide task preparation, with a bias for internal predictions. Using model-based neuroimaging, we then show that the two sources of task prediction are integrated in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and jointly inform a representation of the likelihood of a change in task demand, encoded in frontoparietal cortex. Upon task-stimulus onset, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex encoded the need for reactive task-set adjustment. These data reveal how the human brain integrates external cues and cognitive history to prepare for an upcoming task.

Data availability

Data Availability: Statistical maps for all whole-brain fMRI analyses have been uploaded to https://neurovault.org/collections/3732/ We will share raw behavioral and fMRI data (e.g., using openfmri.org), as well as Matlab source code (using github) for the task and key analyses once this manuscript is published.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jiefeng Jiang

    Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    For correspondence
    jiefeng.jiang@stanford.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4264-6382
  2. Anthony D Wagner

    Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0624-4543
  3. Tobias Egner

    Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7956-3241

Funding

National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH097965)

  • Tobias Egner

National Institute of Aging (F32AG056080)

  • Jiefeng Jiang

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: Twenty-eight volunteers gave informed written consent, in accordance with institutional guidelines. This study was approved by the Duke University Health System Institutional Review Board.

Copyright

© 2018, Jiang et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,533
    views
  • 393
    downloads
  • 32
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Citations by DOI

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jiefeng Jiang
  2. Anthony D Wagner
  3. Tobias Egner
(2018)
Integrated externally and internally generated task predictions Jointly guide cognitive control in prefrontal cortex
eLife 7:e39497.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.39497

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.39497