The RNA interactome of human telomerase RNA reveals a coding-independent role for a histone mRNA in telomere homeostasis

  1. Roland Ivanyi-Nagy  Is a corresponding author
  2. Syed Moiz Ahmed
  3. Sabrina Peter
  4. Priya Dharshana Ramani
  5. Peh Fern Ong
  6. Oliver Dreesen
  7. Peter Dröge  Is a corresponding author
  1. Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
  2. Skin Research Institute Singapore, Singapore

Abstract

Telomerase RNA (TR) provides the template for DNA repeat synthesis at telomeres and is essential for genome stability in continuously dividing cells. We mapped the RNA interactome of human TR (hTR) and identified a set of non-coding and coding hTR-interacting RNAs, including the histone 1C mRNA (HIST1H1C). Disruption of the hTR-HIST1H1C RNA association resulted in markedly increased telomere elongation without affecting telomerase enzymatic activity. Conversely, over-expression of HIST1H1C led to telomere attrition. By using a combination of mutations to disentangle the effects of histone 1 RNA synthesis, protein expression, and hTR interaction, we show that HIST1H1C RNA negatively regulates telomere length independently of its protein coding potential. Taken together, our data provide important insights into a surprisingly complex hTR-RNA interaction network and define an unexpected non-coding RNA role for HIST1H1C in regulating telomere length homeostasis, thus offering a glimpse into the mostly uncharted, vast space of non-canonical messenger RNA functions.

Data availability

Sequencing data have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the accession code SRP123633.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Roland Ivanyi-Nagy

    School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
    For correspondence
    roland.ivanyi-nagy@ntu.edu.sg
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Syed Moiz Ahmed

    School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Sabrina Peter

    School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Priya Dharshana Ramani

    School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Peh Fern Ong

    Cell Ageing, Skin Research Institute Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Oliver Dreesen

    Cell Ageing, Skin Research Institute Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1148-3557
  7. Peter Dröge

    School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
    For correspondence
    pdroge@ntu.edu.sg
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5447-738X

Funding

Ministry of Education - Singapore (MOE2012-T3-1-001)

  • Peter Dröge

Singapore Biomedical Research Council

  • Oliver Dreesen

Agency for Science, Technology and Research

  • Oliver Dreesen

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Raymund Wellinger, Université de Sherbrooke, Canada

Version history

  1. Received: July 12, 2018
  2. Accepted: October 24, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: October 25, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: November 21, 2018 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2018, Ivanyi-Nagy et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,410
    Page views
  • 501
    Downloads
  • 13
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Roland Ivanyi-Nagy
  2. Syed Moiz Ahmed
  3. Sabrina Peter
  4. Priya Dharshana Ramani
  5. Peh Fern Ong
  6. Oliver Dreesen
  7. Peter Dröge
(2018)
The RNA interactome of human telomerase RNA reveals a coding-independent role for a histone mRNA in telomere homeostasis
eLife 7:e40037.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.40037

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.40037

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Erandi Velazquez-Miranda, Ming He
    Insight

    Endothelial cell subpopulations are characterized by unique gene expression profiles, epigenetic landscapes and functional properties.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Monica Salinas-Pena, Elena Rebollo, Albert Jordan
    Research Article

    Histone H1 participates in chromatin condensation and regulates nuclear processes. Human somatic cells may contain up to seven histone H1 variants, although their functional heterogeneity is not fully understood. Here, we have profiled the differential nuclear distribution of the somatic H1 repertoire in human cells through imaging techniques including super-resolution microscopy. H1 variants exhibit characteristic distribution patterns in both interphase and mitosis. H1.2, H1.3, and H1.5 are universally enriched at the nuclear periphery in all cell lines analyzed and co-localize with compacted DNA. H1.0 shows a less pronounced peripheral localization, with apparent variability among different cell lines. On the other hand, H1.4 and H1X are distributed throughout the nucleus, being H1X universally enriched in high-GC regions and abundant in the nucleoli. Interestingly, H1.4 and H1.0 show a more peripheral distribution in cell lines lacking H1.3 and H1.5. The differential distribution patterns of H1 suggest specific functionalities in organizing lamina-associated domains or nucleolar activity, which is further supported by a distinct response of H1X or phosphorylated H1.4 to the inhibition of ribosomal DNA transcription. Moreover, H1 variants depletion affects chromatin structure in a variant-specific manner. Concretely, H1.2 knock-down, either alone or combined, triggers a global chromatin decompaction. Overall, imaging has allowed us to distinguish H1 variants distribution beyond the segregation in two groups denoted by previous ChIP-Seq determinations. Our results support H1 variants heterogeneity and suggest that variant-specific functionality can be shared between different cell types.