Identification and characterisation of hypomethylated DNA loci controlling quantitative resistance in Arabidopsis

  1. Leonardo Furci
  2. Ritushree Jain
  3. Joost Stassen
  4. Oliver Berkowitz
  5. James Whelan
  6. David Roquis
  7. Victoire Baillet
  8. Vincent Colot
  9. Frank Johannes
  10. Jurriaan Ton  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Sheffield, United Kingdom
  2. La Trobe University, Australia
  3. Technical University of Munich, Germany
  4. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale), PSL Université Paris, France

Abstract

Variation in DNA methylation enables plants to inherit traits independently of changes to DNA sequence. Here, we have screened an Arabidopsis population of epigenetic recombinant inbred lines (epiRILs) for resistance against Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis (Hpa). These lines share the same genetic background, but show variation in heritable patterns of DNA methylation. We identified 4 epigenetic quantitative trait loci (epiQTLs) that provide quantitative resistance without reducing plant growth or resistance to other (a)biotic stresses. Phenotypic characterisation and RNA-sequencing analysis revealed that Hpa-resistant epiRILs are primed to activate defence responses at the relatively early stages of infection. Collectively, our results show that hypomethylation at selected pericentromeric regions is sufficient to provide quantitative disease resistance, which is associated with genome-wide priming of defence-related genes. Based on comparisons of global gene expression and DNA methylation between the wild-type and resistant epiRILs, we discuss mechanisms by which the pericentromeric epiQTLs could regulate the defence-related transcriptome.

Data availability

Transcriptome sequencing and bisulfite sequencing reads are available from the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) under accession code PRJEB26953

The following data sets were generated
    1. Furci et al
    (2018) RNA-seq and WBGS
    European Nucleotide Archive, PRJEB26953.
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Leonardo Furci

    Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Ritushree Jain

    Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Joost Stassen

    Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5483-325X
  4. Oliver Berkowitz

    Department of Animal, Plant and Soil Science, ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7671-6983
  5. James Whelan

    Department of Animal, Plant and Soil Science, ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. David Roquis

    Department of Plant Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Victoire Baillet

    Institut de Biologie de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure (IBENS), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale), PSL Université Paris, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Vincent Colot

    Institut de Biologie de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure (IBENS), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale), PSL Université Paris, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6382-1610
  9. Frank Johannes

    Department of Plant Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Jurriaan Ton

    Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    j.ton@sheffield.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8512-2802

Funding

Leverhulme Trust (RL-2012-042)

  • Jurriaan Ton

H2020 European Research Council (RL-2012-042)

  • Jurriaan Ton

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2019, Furci et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,234
    views
  • 905
    downloads
  • 79
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Leonardo Furci
  2. Ritushree Jain
  3. Joost Stassen
  4. Oliver Berkowitz
  5. James Whelan
  6. David Roquis
  7. Victoire Baillet
  8. Vincent Colot
  9. Frank Johannes
  10. Jurriaan Ton
(2019)
Identification and characterisation of hypomethylated DNA loci controlling quantitative resistance in Arabidopsis
eLife 8:e40655.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.40655

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.40655

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Plant Biology
    Masanori Izumi, Sakuya Nakamura ... Shinya Hagihara
    Research Article

    Plants distribute many nutrients to chloroplasts during leaf development and maturation. When leaves senesce or experience sugar starvation, the autophagy machinery degrades chloroplast proteins to facilitate efficient nutrient reuse. Here, we report on the intracellular dynamics of an autophagy pathway responsible for piecemeal degradation of chloroplast components. Through live-cell monitoring of chloroplast morphology, we observed the formation of chloroplast budding structures in sugar-starved leaves. These buds were then released and incorporated into the vacuolar lumen as an autophagic cargo termed a Rubisco-containing body. The budding structures did not accumulate in mutants of core autophagy machinery, suggesting that autophagosome creation is required for forming chloroplast buds. Simultaneous tracking of chloroplast morphology and autophagosome development revealed that the isolation membranes of autophagosomes interact closely with part of the chloroplast surface before forming chloroplast buds. Chloroplasts then protrude at the site associated with the isolation membranes, which divide synchronously with autophagosome maturation. This autophagy-related division does not require DYNAMIN-RELATED PROTEIN 5B, which constitutes the division ring for chloroplast proliferation in growing leaves. An unidentified division machinery may thus fragment chloroplasts for degradation in coordination with the development of the chloroplast-associated isolation membrane.

    1. Plant Biology
    Koji Kato, Yoshiki Nakajima ... Ryo Nagao
    Research Article

    Photosynthetic organisms exhibit remarkable diversity in their light-harvesting complexes (LHCs). LHCs are associated with photosystem I (PSI), forming a PSI-LHCI supercomplex. The number of LHCI subunits, along with their protein sequences and pigment compositions, has been found to differ greatly among the PSI-LHCI structures. However, the mechanisms by which LHCIs recognize their specific binding sites within the PSI core remain unclear. In this study, we determined the cryo-electron microscopy structure of a PSI supercomplex incorporating fucoxanthin chlorophyll a/c-binding proteins (FCPs), designated as PSI-FCPI, isolated from the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana CCMP1335. Structural analysis of PSI-FCPI revealed five FCPI subunits associated with a PSI monomer; these subunits were identified as RedCAP, Lhcr3, Lhcq10, Lhcf10, and Lhcq8. Through structural and sequence analyses, we identified specific protein–protein interactions at the interfaces between FCPI and PSI subunits, as well as among FCPI subunits themselves. Comparative structural analyses of PSI-FCPI supercomplexes, combined with phylogenetic analysis of FCPs from T. pseudonana and the diatom Chaetoceros gracilis, underscore the evolutionary conservation of protein motifs crucial for the selective binding of individual FCPI subunits. These findings provide significant insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying the assembly and selective binding of FCPIs in diatoms.