Identification and characterisation of hypomethylated DNA loci controlling quantitative resistance in Arabidopsis

  1. Leonardo Furci
  2. Ritushree Jain
  3. Joost Stassen
  4. Oliver Berkowitz
  5. James Whelan
  6. David Roquis
  7. Victoire Baillet
  8. Vincent Colot
  9. Frank Johannes
  10. Jurriaan Ton  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Sheffield, United Kingdom
  2. La Trobe University, Australia
  3. Technical University of Munich, Germany
  4. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale), PSL Université Paris, France

Abstract

Variation in DNA methylation enables plants to inherit traits independently of changes to DNA sequence. Here, we have screened an Arabidopsis population of epigenetic recombinant inbred lines (epiRILs) for resistance against Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis (Hpa). These lines share the same genetic background, but show variation in heritable patterns of DNA methylation. We identified 4 epigenetic quantitative trait loci (epiQTLs) that provide quantitative resistance without reducing plant growth or resistance to other (a)biotic stresses. Phenotypic characterisation and RNA-sequencing analysis revealed that Hpa-resistant epiRILs are primed to activate defence responses at the relatively early stages of infection. Collectively, our results show that hypomethylation at selected pericentromeric regions is sufficient to provide quantitative disease resistance, which is associated with genome-wide priming of defence-related genes. Based on comparisons of global gene expression and DNA methylation between the wild-type and resistant epiRILs, we discuss mechanisms by which the pericentromeric epiQTLs could regulate the defence-related transcriptome.

Data availability

Transcriptome sequencing and bisulfite sequencing reads are available from the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) under accession code PRJEB26953

The following data sets were generated
    1. Furci et al
    (2018) RNA-seq and WBGS
    European Nucleotide Archive, PRJEB26953.
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Leonardo Furci

    Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Ritushree Jain

    Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Joost Stassen

    Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5483-325X
  4. Oliver Berkowitz

    Department of Animal, Plant and Soil Science, ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7671-6983
  5. James Whelan

    Department of Animal, Plant and Soil Science, ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. David Roquis

    Department of Plant Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Victoire Baillet

    Institut de Biologie de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure (IBENS), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale), PSL Université Paris, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Vincent Colot

    Institut de Biologie de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure (IBENS), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale), PSL Université Paris, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6382-1610
  9. Frank Johannes

    Department of Plant Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Jurriaan Ton

    Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    j.ton@sheffield.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8512-2802

Funding

Leverhulme Trust (RL-2012-042)

  • Jurriaan Ton

H2020 European Research Council (RL-2012-042)

  • Jurriaan Ton

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2019, Furci et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,368
    views
  • 922
    downloads
  • 82
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Leonardo Furci
  2. Ritushree Jain
  3. Joost Stassen
  4. Oliver Berkowitz
  5. James Whelan
  6. David Roquis
  7. Victoire Baillet
  8. Vincent Colot
  9. Frank Johannes
  10. Jurriaan Ton
(2019)
Identification and characterisation of hypomethylated DNA loci controlling quantitative resistance in Arabidopsis
eLife 8:e40655.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.40655

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.40655

Further reading

    1. Plant Biology
    Sonal Gupta, Simon Niels Groen ... Michael D Purugganan
    Research Article

    Populations can adapt to stressful environments through changes in gene expression. However, the fitness effect of gene expression in mediating stress response and adaptation remains largely unexplored. Here, we use an integrative field dataset obtained from 780 plants of Oryza sativa ssp. indica (rice) grown in a field experiment under normal or moderate salt stress conditions to examine selection and evolution of gene expression variation under salinity stress conditions. We find that salinity stress induces increased selective pressure on gene expression. Further, we show that trans-eQTLs rather than cis-eQTLs are primarily associated with rice’s gene expression under salinity stress, potentially via a few master-regulators. Importantly, and contrary to the expectations, we find that cis-trans reinforcement is more common than cis-trans compensation which may be reflective of rice diversification subsequent to domestication. We further identify genetic fixation as the likely mechanism underlying this compensation/reinforcement. Additionally, we show that cis- and trans-eQTLs are under balancing and purifying selection, respectively, giving us insights into the evolutionary dynamics of gene expression variation. By examining genomic, transcriptomic, and phenotypic variation across a rice population, we gain insights into the molecular and genetic landscape underlying adaptive salinity stress responses, which is relevant for other crops and other stresses.

    1. Plant Biology
    Zigmunds Orlovskis, Archana Singh ... Saskia A Hogenhout
    Research Article

    Obligate parasites often trigger significant changes in their hosts to facilitate transmission to new hosts. The molecular mechanisms behind these extended phenotypes - where genetic information of one organism is manifested as traits in another - remain largely unclear. This study explores the role of the virulence protein SAP54, produced by parasitic phytoplasmas, in attracting leafhopper vectors. SAP54 is responsible for the induction of leaf-like flowers in phytoplasma-infected plants. However, we previously demonstrated that the insects were attracted to leaves and the leaf-like flowers were not required. Here, we made the surprising discovery that leaf exposure to leafhopper males is required for the attraction phenotype, suggesting a leaf response that distinguishes leafhopper sex in the presence of SAP54. In contrast, this phytoplasma effector alongside leafhopper females discourages further female colonization. We demonstrate that SAP54 effectively suppresses biotic stress response pathways in leaves exposed to the males. Critically, the host plant MADS-box transcription factor short vegetative phase (SVP) emerges as a key element in the female leafhopper preference for plants exposed to males, with SAP54 promoting the degradation of SVP. This preference extends to female colonization of male-exposed svp null mutant plants over those not exposed to males. Our research underscores the dual role of the phytoplasma effector SAP54 in host development alteration and vector attraction - integral to the phytoplasma life cycle. Importantly, we clarify how SAP54, by targeting SVP, heightens leaf vulnerability to leafhopper males, thus facilitating female attraction and subsequent plant colonization by the insects. SAP54 essentially acts as a molecular ‘matchmaker’, helping male leafhoppers more easily locate mates by degrading SVP-containing complexes in leaves. This study not only provides insights into the long reach of single parasite genes in extended phenotypes, but also opens avenues for understanding how transcription factors that regulate plant developmental processes intersect with and influence plant-insect interactions.