High-throughput synapse-resolving two-photon fluorescence microendoscopy for deep-brain volumetric imaging in vivo

  1. Guanghan Meng
  2. Yajie Liang
  3. Sarah Sarsfield
  4. Wan-chen Jiang
  5. Rongwen Lu
  6. Joshua Tate Dudman
  7. Yeka Aponte
  8. Na Ji  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of California, Berkeley, United States
  2. Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, United States
  3. National Institute on Drug Abuse, United States
  4. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, United States

Abstract

Optical imaging has become a powerful tool for studying brains in vivo. The opacity of adult brains makes microendoscopy, with an optical probe such as a gradient index (GRIN) lens embedded into brain tissue to provide optical relay, the method of choice for imaging neurons and neural activity in deeply buried brain structures. Incorporating a Bessel focus scanning module into two-photon fluorescence microendoscopy, we extended the excitation focus axially and improved its lateral resolution. Scanning the Bessel focus in 2D, we imaged volumes of neurons at high-throughput while resolving fine structures such as synaptic terminals. We applied this approach to the volumetric anatomical imaging of dendritic spines and axonal boutons in the mouse hippocampus, and functional imaging of GABAergic neurons in the mouse lateral hypothalamus in vivo.

Data availability

Almost all data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper or the supplementary materials; Raw image data for Figs. 2, 4 & 9 are available from Dryad, 10.5061/dryad.pr4t978

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Guanghan Meng

    Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Yajie Liang

    Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Sarah Sarsfield

    Neuronal Circuits and Behavior Unit, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Wan-chen Jiang

    Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Rongwen Lu

    Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    Rongwen Lu, The Bessel focus scanning intellectual property has been licensed to Thorlabs, Inc. by HHMI.
  6. Joshua Tate Dudman

    Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4436-1057
  7. Yeka Aponte

    Solomon H Snyder Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5967-2579
  8. Na Ji

    Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    For correspondence
    jina@berkeley.edu
    Competing interests
    Na Ji, The Bessel focus scanning intellectual property has been licensed to Thorlabs, Inc. by HHMI.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5527-1663

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • Guanghan Meng
  • Yajie Liang
  • Wan-chen Jiang
  • Rongwen Lu
  • Joshua Tate Dudman
  • Na Ji

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke

  • Guanghan Meng
  • Na Ji

National Institute on Drug Abuse

  • Sarah Sarsfield
  • Yeka Aponte

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. David Kleinfeld, University of California, San Diego, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experiments were conducted according to the United States National Institutes of Health guidelines for animal research. Procedures and protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute (protocol number: 16-147)

Version history

  1. Received: August 5, 2018
  2. Accepted: December 20, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: January 3, 2019 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: January 4, 2019 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record published: January 18, 2019 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2019, Meng et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 11,331
    views
  • 1,596
    downloads
  • 76
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Guanghan Meng
  2. Yajie Liang
  3. Sarah Sarsfield
  4. Wan-chen Jiang
  5. Rongwen Lu
  6. Joshua Tate Dudman
  7. Yeka Aponte
  8. Na Ji
(2019)
High-throughput synapse-resolving two-photon fluorescence microendoscopy for deep-brain volumetric imaging in vivo
eLife 8:e40805.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.40805

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.40805

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Zilu Liang, Simeng Wu ... Chao Liu
    Research Article

    People form impressions about others during daily social encounters and infer personality traits from others' behaviors. Such trait inference is thought to rely on two universal dimensions: competence and warmth. These two dimensions can be used to construct a ‘social cognitive map’ organizing massive information obtained from social encounters efficiently. Originating from spatial cognition, the neural codes supporting the representation and navigation of spatial cognitive maps have been widely studied. Recent studies suggest similar neural mechanism subserves the map-like architecture in social cognition as well. Here we investigated how spatial codes operate beyond the physical environment and support the representation and navigation of social cognitive map. We designed a social value space defined by two dimensions of competence and warmth. Behaviorally, participants were able to navigate to a learned location from random starting locations in this abstract social space. At the neural level, we identified the representation of distance in the precuneus, fusiform gyrus, and middle occipital gyrus. We also found partial evidence of grid-like representation patterns in the medial prefrontal cortex and entorhinal cortex. Moreover, the intensity of grid-like response scaled with the performance of navigating in social space and social avoidance trait scores. Our findings suggest a neurocognitive mechanism by which social information can be organized into a structured representation, namely cognitive map and its relevance to social well-being.

    1. Neuroscience
    Alina Tetereva, Narun Pat
    Research Article

    One well-known biomarker candidate that supposedly helps capture fluid cognition is Brain Age, or a predicted value based on machine-learning models built to predict chronological age from brain MRI. To formally evaluate the utility of Brain Age for capturing fluid cognition, we built 26 age-prediction models for Brain Age based on different combinations of MRI modalities, using the Human Connectome Project in Aging (n=504, 36–100 years old). First, based on commonality analyses, we found a large overlap between Brain Age and chronological age: Brain Age could uniquely add only around 1.6% in explaining variation in fluid cognition over and above chronological age. Second, the age-prediction models that performed better at predicting chronological age did NOT necessarily create better Brain Age for capturing fluid cognition over and above chronological age. Instead, better-performing age-prediction models created Brain Age that overlapped larger with chronological age, up to around 29% out of 32%, in explaining fluid cognition. Third, Brain Age missed around 11% of the total variation in fluid cognition that could have been explained by the brain variation. That is, directly predicting fluid cognition from brain MRI data (instead of relying on Brain Age and chronological age) could lead to around a 1/3-time improvement of the total variation explained. Accordingly, we demonstrated the limited utility of Brain Age as a biomarker for fluid cognition and made some suggestions to ensure the utility of Brain Age in explaining fluid cognition and other phenotypes of interest.