1. Developmental Biology
  2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
Download icon

Nephron progenitor commitment is a stochastic process influenced by cell migration

  1. Kynan T Lawlor
  2. Luke Zappia
  3. James Lefevre
  4. Joo-Seop Park
  5. Nicholas A Hamilton
  6. Alicia Oshlack
  7. Melissa H Little  Is a corresponding author
  8. Alexander Nicholas Combes  Is a corresponding author
  1. Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Australia
  2. University of Queensland, Australia
  3. Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, United States
  4. Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Australia
  5. University of Melbourne, Australia
Research Article
  • Cited 9
  • Views 1,966
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2019;8:e41156 doi: 10.7554/eLife.41156

Abstract

Progenitor self-renewal and differentiation is often regulated by spatially restricted cues within a tissue microenvironment. Here we examine how progenitor cell migration impacts regionally induced commitment within the nephrogenic niche in mice. We identify a subset of cells that express Wnt4, an early marker of nephron commitment, but migrate back into the progenitor population where they accumulate over time. Single cell RNA-seq and computational modelling of returning cells reveals that nephron progenitors can traverse the transcriptional hierarchy between self-renewal and commitment in either direction. This plasticity may enable robust regulation of nephrogenesis as niches remodel and grow during organogenesis.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Kynan T Lawlor

    Cell Biology, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4080-5439
  2. Luke Zappia

    Cell Biology, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. James Lefevre

    Division of Genomics of Development and Disease, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Joo-Seop Park

    Division of Pediatric Urology and Division of Developmental Biology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Nicholas A Hamilton

    Division of Genomics of Development and Disease, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Alicia Oshlack

    Cell Biology, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Melissa H Little

    Kidney Development, Disease and Regeneration, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
    For correspondence
    Melissa.Little@mcri.edu.au
    Competing interests
    Melissa H Little, Has consulted for and received research funding from Organovo Inc.
  8. Alexander Nicholas Combes

    Anatomy and Neuroscience, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    For correspondence
    alexander.combes@unimelb.edu.au
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6008-8786

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council (GNT1156567)

  • Alexander Nicholas Combes

Australian Research Council (DE150100652)

  • Alexander Nicholas Combes

Murdoch Children's Research Institute

  • Alexander Nicholas Combes

National Health and Medical Research Council (GNT1136085)

  • Melissa H Little

National Health and Medical Research Council (GNT1063989)

  • Melissa H Little

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experiments were assessed and approved by the Murdoch Children's Research Institute Animal Ethics Committee (A783/A894) and were conducted in accordance with applicable Australian laws governing the care and use of animals for scientific purposes.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Elizabeth Robertson, University of Oxford, United Kingdom

Publication history

  1. Received: August 16, 2018
  2. Accepted: January 23, 2019
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: January 24, 2019 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: February 5, 2019 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2019, Lawlor et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,966
    Page views
  • 283
    Downloads
  • 9
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, Scopus, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    David Melamed, Daniel Kalderon
    Research Article Updated

    Many adult stem cell communities are maintained by population asymmetry, where stochastic behaviors of multiple individual cells collectively result in a balance between stem cell division and differentiation. We investigated how this is achieved for Drosophila Follicle Stem Cells (FSCs) by spatially-restricted niche signals. FSCs produce transit-amplifying Follicle Cells (FCs) from their posterior face and quiescent Escort Cells (ECs) to their anterior. We show that JAK-STAT pathway activity, which declines from posterior to anterior, dictates the pattern of divisions over the FSC domain, promotes more posterior FSC locations and conversion to FCs, while opposing EC production. Wnt pathway activity declines from the anterior, promotes anterior FSC locations and EC production, and opposes FC production. The pathways combine to define a stem cell domain through concerted effects on FSC differentiation to ECs and FCs at either end of opposing signaling gradients, and impose a pattern of proliferation that matches derivative production.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    André Ferreira Castro et al.
    Research Article

    Class I ventral posterior dendritic arborisation (c1vpda) proprioceptive sensory neurons respond to contractions in the Drosophila larval body wall during crawling. Their dendritic branches run along the direction of contraction, possibly a functional requirement to maximise membrane curvature during crawling contractions. Although the molecular machinery of dendritic patterning in c1vpda has been extensively studied, the process leading to the precise elaboration of their comb-like shapes remains elusive. Here, to link dendrite shape with its proprioceptive role, we performed long-term, non-invasive, in vivo time-lapse imaging of c1vpda embryonic and larval morphogenesis to reveal a sequence of differentiation stages. We combined computer models and dendritic branch dynamics tracking to propose that distinct sequential phases of stochastic growth and retraction achieve efficient dendritic trees both in terms of wire and function. Our study shows how dendrite growth balances structure–function requirements, shedding new light on general principles of self-organisation in functionally specialised dendrites.