1. Developmental Biology
  2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
Download icon

Nephron progenitor commitment is a stochastic process influenced by cell migration

  1. Kynan T Lawlor
  2. Luke Zappia
  3. James Lefevre
  4. Joo-Seop Park
  5. Nicholas A Hamilton
  6. Alicia Oshlack
  7. Melissa H Little  Is a corresponding author
  8. Alexander Nicholas Combes  Is a corresponding author
  1. Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Australia
  2. University of Queensland, Australia
  3. Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, United States
  4. Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Australia
  5. University of Melbourne, Australia
Research Article
  • Cited 12
  • Views 2,072
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2019;8:e41156 doi: 10.7554/eLife.41156

Abstract

Progenitor self-renewal and differentiation is often regulated by spatially restricted cues within a tissue microenvironment. Here we examine how progenitor cell migration impacts regionally induced commitment within the nephrogenic niche in mice. We identify a subset of cells that express Wnt4, an early marker of nephron commitment, but migrate back into the progenitor population where they accumulate over time. Single cell RNA-seq and computational modelling of returning cells reveals that nephron progenitors can traverse the transcriptional hierarchy between self-renewal and commitment in either direction. This plasticity may enable robust regulation of nephrogenesis as niches remodel and grow during organogenesis.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Kynan T Lawlor

    Cell Biology, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4080-5439
  2. Luke Zappia

    Cell Biology, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. James Lefevre

    Division of Genomics of Development and Disease, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Joo-Seop Park

    Division of Pediatric Urology and Division of Developmental Biology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Nicholas A Hamilton

    Division of Genomics of Development and Disease, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Alicia Oshlack

    Cell Biology, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Melissa H Little

    Kidney Development, Disease and Regeneration, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
    For correspondence
    Melissa.Little@mcri.edu.au
    Competing interests
    Melissa H Little, Has consulted for and received research funding from Organovo Inc.
  8. Alexander Nicholas Combes

    Anatomy and Neuroscience, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    For correspondence
    alexander.combes@unimelb.edu.au
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6008-8786

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council (GNT1156567)

  • Alexander Nicholas Combes

Australian Research Council (DE150100652)

  • Alexander Nicholas Combes

Murdoch Children's Research Institute

  • Alexander Nicholas Combes

National Health and Medical Research Council (GNT1136085)

  • Melissa H Little

National Health and Medical Research Council (GNT1063989)

  • Melissa H Little

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experiments were assessed and approved by the Murdoch Children's Research Institute Animal Ethics Committee (A783/A894) and were conducted in accordance with applicable Australian laws governing the care and use of animals for scientific purposes.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Elizabeth Robertson, University of Oxford, United Kingdom

Publication history

  1. Received: August 16, 2018
  2. Accepted: January 23, 2019
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: January 24, 2019 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: February 5, 2019 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2019, Lawlor et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,072
    Page views
  • 297
    Downloads
  • 12
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, Scopus, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    Feng Wang et al.
    Research Article Updated

    The X-linked gene Rlim plays major roles in female mouse development and reproduction, where it is crucial for the maintenance of imprinted X chromosome inactivation in extraembryonic tissues of embryos. However, while females carrying a systemic Rlim knockout (KO) die around implantation, male Rlim KO mice appear healthy and are fertile. Here, we report an important role for Rlim in testis where it is highly expressed in post-meiotic round spermatids as well as in Sertoli cells. Systemic deletion of the Rlim gene results in lower numbers of mature sperm that contains excess cytoplasm, leading to decreased sperm motility and in vitro fertilization rates. Targeting the conditional Rlim cKO specifically to the spermatogenic cell lineage largely recapitulates this phenotype. These results reveal functions of Rlim in male reproduction specifically in round spermatids during spermiogenesis.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Hiroki Takechi et al.
    Research Article

    Transmembrane protein Golden goal (Gogo) interacts with atypical cadherin Flamingo to direct R8 photoreceptor axons in the Drosophila visual system. However, the precise mechanisms underlying Gogo regulation during columnar- and layer-specific R8 axon targeting are unknown. Our studies demonstrated that the insulin secreted from surface and cortex glia switches the phosphorylation status of Gogo, thereby regulating its two distinct functions. Non-phosphorylated Gogo mediates the initial recognition of the glial protrusion in the center of the medulla column, whereas phosphorylated Gogo suppresses radial filopodia extension by counteracting Flamingo to maintain a one axon to one column ratio. Later, Gogo expression ceases during the midpupal stage, thus allowing R8 filopodia to extend vertically into the M3 layer. These results demonstrate that the long- and short-range signaling between the glia and R8 axon growth cones regulates growth cone dynamics in a stepwise manner, and thus shape the entire organization of the visual system.