1. Computational and Systems Biology
Download icon

Synthetic and genomic regulatory elements reveal aspects of cis-regulatory grammar in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells

  1. Dana M King
  2. Clarice Kit Yee Hong
  3. James L Shepherdson
  4. David M Granas
  5. Brett B Maricque
  6. Barak Cohen  Is a corresponding author
  1. Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, United States
Research Article
  • Cited 12
  • Views 3,197
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2020;9:e41279 doi: 10.7554/eLife.41279

Abstract

In embryonic stem cells (ESCs), a core transcription factor (TF) network establishes the gene expression program necessary for pluripotency. To address how interactions between four key TFs contribute to cis-regulation in mouse ESCs, we assayed two massively parallel reporter assay (MPRA) libraries composed of binding sites for SOX2, POU5F1 (OCT4), KLF4, and ESRRB. Comparisons between synthetic cis-regulatory elements and genomic sequences with comparable binding site configurations revealed some aspects of a regulatory grammar. The expression of synthetic elements is influenced by both the number and arrangement of binding sites. This grammar plays only a small role for genomic sequences, as the relative activities of genomic sequences are best explained by the predicted affinity of binding sites, regardless of binding site identity and positioning. Our results suggest that the effects of transcription factor binding sites (TFBS) are influenced by the order and orientation of sites, but that in the genome the overall occupancy of TFs is the primary determinant of activity.

Data availability

Sequencing data has been deposited in GEO under accession code GSE120240.Any additional data generated during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Dana M King

    Edison Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4635-5272
  2. Clarice Kit Yee Hong

    Edison Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. James L Shepherdson

    Edison Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. David M Granas

    Edison Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Brett B Maricque

    Edison Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Barak Cohen

    Edison Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, United States
    For correspondence
    cohen@wustl.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3350-2715

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01 GM092910)

  • Barak Cohen

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Patricia J Wittkopp, University of Michigan, United States

Publication history

  1. Received: August 20, 2018
  2. Accepted: February 7, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: February 11, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: March 17, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, King et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,197
    Page views
  • 431
    Downloads
  • 12
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Epidemiology and Global Health
    Hannah R Meredith et al.
    Research Article

    Human mobility is a core component of human behavior and its quantification is critical for understanding its impact on infectious disease transmission, traffic forecasting, access to resources and care, intervention strategies, and migratory flows. When mobility data are limited, spatial interaction models have been widely used to estimate human travel, but have not been extensively validated in low- and middle-income settings. Geographic, sociodemographic, and infrastructure differences may impact the ability for models to capture these patterns, particularly in rural settings. Here, we analyzed mobility patterns inferred from mobile phone data in four Sub-Saharan African countries to investigate the ability for variants on gravity and radiation models to estimate travel. Adjusting the gravity model such that parameters were fit to different trip types, including travel between more or less populated areas and/or different regions, improved model fit in all four countries. This suggests that alternative models may be more useful in these settings and better able to capture the range of mobility patterns observed.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    Daniel Griffith, Alex S Holehouse
    Tools and Resources

    The rise of high-throughput experiments has transformed how scientists approach biological questions. The ubiquity of large-scale assays that can test thousands of samples in a day has necessitated the development of new computational approaches to interpret this data. Among these tools, machine learning approaches are increasingly being utilized due to their ability to infer complex nonlinear patterns from high-dimensional data. Despite their effectiveness, machine learning (and in particular deep learning) approaches are not always accessible or easy to implement for those with limited computational expertise. Here we present PARROT, a general framework for training and applying deep learning-based predictors on large protein datasets. Using an internal recurrent neural network architecture, PARROT is capable of tackling both classification and regression tasks while only requiring raw protein sequences as input. We showcase the potential uses of PARROT on three diverse machine learning tasks: predicting phosphorylation sites, predicting transcriptional activation function of peptides generated by high-throughput reporter assays, and predicting the fibrillization propensity of amyloid beta with data generated by deep mutational scanning. Through these examples, we demonstrate that PARROT is easy to use, performs comparably to state-of-the-art computational tools, and is applicable for a wide array of biological problems.