Abstract

Although B cells expressing the IFNgR or the IFNg-inducible transcription factor T-bet drive autoimmunity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)-prone mouse models, the role for IFNg signaling in human antibody responses is unknown. We show that elevated levels of IFNg in SLE patients correlate with expansion of the T-bet expressing IgDnegCD27negCD11c+CXCR5neg (DN2) pre-antibody secreting cell (pre-ASC) subset. We demonstrate that naïve B cells form T-bethi pre-ASCs following stimulation with either Th1 cells or with IFNg, IL-2, anti-Ig and TLR7/8 ligand and that IL-21 dependent ASC formation is significantly enhanced by IFNg or IFNg-producing T cells. IFNg promotes ASC development by synergizing with IL-2 and TLR7/8 ligands to induce genome-wide epigenetic reprogramming of B cells, which results in increased chromatin accessibility surrounding IRF4 and BLIMP1 binding motifs and epigenetic remodeling of IL21R and PRDM1 loci. Finally, we show that IFNg signals poise B cells to differentiate by increasing their responsiveness to IL-21.

Data availability

Sequencing data have been deposited in GEO under accession codes GSE95282 and GSE118984. All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files for sequencing analysis are included as Supplementary Files 1 and 2 (excel files).

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Esther Zumaquero

    Department of Microbiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Sara L Stone

    Department of Microbiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1689-8148
  3. Christopher D Scharer

    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University, Atlanta, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7716-8504
  4. Scott A Jenks

    Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Emory University, Atlanta, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Anoma Nellore

    Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Betty Mousseau

    Department of Microbiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Antonio Rosal-Vela

    Department of Microbiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Davide Botta

    Department of Microbiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3926-0662
  9. John E Bradley

    Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Wojciech Wojciechowski

    Center for Pediatric Biomedical Research, University of Rochester, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Travis Ptacek

    Department of Microbiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Maria I Danila

    Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Jeffrey C Edberg

    Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. S Louis Bridges

    Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Robert P Kimberly

    Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. W Winn Chatham

    Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Trenton R Schoeb

    Department of Genetics, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Alexander F Rosenberg

    Department of Microbiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Jeremy M Boss

    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University, Atlanta, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  20. Inaki Sanz

    Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Emory University, Atlanta, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  21. Frances E Lund

    Department of Microbiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States
    For correspondence
    flund@uab.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3083-1246

Funding

NIH Office of the Director (UL1 TR001417)

  • Travis Ptacek

NIH Office of the Director (1P30 DK079337)

  • Trenton R Schoeb

NIH Office of the Director (P01 AI078907)

  • Frances E Lund

NIH Office of the Director (R01 AI110508)

  • Frances E Lund

NIH Office of the Director (R01 AI123733)

  • Jeremy Boss

NIH Office of the Director (P01 AI125180)

  • Jeremy M Boss

NIH Office of the Director (R37 AI049660)

  • Sanz Inaki

NIH Office of the Director (U19 AI110483)

  • Sanz Inaki

NIH Office of the Director (T32 GM008361)

  • Sara L Stone

NIH Office of the Director (K23 AR062100)

  • Maria I Danila

Lupus Research Alliance (#550070)

  • Frances E Lund

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All procedures involving animals were approved by the UAB Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and were conducted in accordance with the principles outlined by the National Research Council. UAB IACUC approval IACUC-09648 and IACUC-21203.

Human subjects: All subjects gave written informed consent for participation and provided peripheral blood for analysis. The UAB and Emory Human Subjects Institutional Review Board approved all study protocols for healthy donors and SLE patients. IRB protocols 160301002, X020805006, X140213002, and N140102003 for UAB and 58515 for Emory.

Copyright

© 2019, Zumaquero et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,627
    views
  • 1,059
    downloads
  • 126
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Esther Zumaquero
  2. Sara L Stone
  3. Christopher D Scharer
  4. Scott A Jenks
  5. Anoma Nellore
  6. Betty Mousseau
  7. Antonio Rosal-Vela
  8. Davide Botta
  9. John E Bradley
  10. Wojciech Wojciechowski
  11. Travis Ptacek
  12. Maria I Danila
  13. Jeffrey C Edberg
  14. S Louis Bridges
  15. Robert P Kimberly
  16. W Winn Chatham
  17. Trenton R Schoeb
  18. Alexander F Rosenberg
  19. Jeremy M Boss
  20. Inaki Sanz
  21. Frances E Lund
(2019)
IFNγ induces epigenetic programming of human T-bethi B cells and promotesTLR7/8 and IL-21 induced differentiation
eLife 8:e41641.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.41641

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.41641

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Patsy R Tomlinson, Rachel G Knox ... Robert K Semple
    Research Article

    PIK3R1 encodes three regulatory subunits of class IA phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), each associating with any of three catalytic subunits, namely p110α, p110β, or p110δ. Constitutional PIK3R1 mutations cause diseases with a genotype-phenotype relationship not yet fully explained: heterozygous loss-of-function mutations cause SHORT syndrome, featuring insulin resistance and short stature attributed to reduced p110α function, while heterozygous activating mutations cause immunodeficiency, attributed to p110δ activation and known as APDS2. Surprisingly, APDS2 patients do not show features of p110α hyperactivation, but do commonly have SHORT syndrome-like features, suggesting p110α hypofunction. We sought to investigate this. In dermal fibroblasts from an APDS2 patient, we found no increased PI3K signalling, with p110δ expression markedly reduced. In preadipocytes, the APDS2 variant was potently dominant negative, associating with Irs1 and Irs2 but failing to heterodimerise with p110α. This attenuation of p110α signalling by a p110δ-activating PIK3R1 variant potentially explains co-incidence of gain-of-function and loss-of-function PIK3R1 phenotypes.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Sofia V Krasik, Ekaterina A Bryushkova ... Ekaterina O Serebrovskaya
    Research Article

    The current understanding of humoral immune response in cancer patients suggests that tumors may be infiltrated with diffuse B cells of extra-tumoral origin or may develop organized lymphoid structures, where somatic hypermutation and antigen-driven selection occur locally. These processes are believed to be significantly influenced by the tumor microenvironment through secretory factors and biased cell-cell interactions. To explore the manifestation of this influence, we used deep unbiased immunoglobulin profiling and systematically characterized the relationships between B cells in circulation, draining lymph nodes (draining LNs), and tumors in 14 patients with three human cancers. We demonstrated that draining LNs are differentially involved in the interaction with the tumor site, and that significant heterogeneity exists even between different parts of a single lymph node (LN). Next, we confirmed and elaborated upon previous observations regarding intratumoral immunoglobulin heterogeneity. We identified B cell receptor (BCR) clonotypes that were expanded in tumors relative to draining LNs and blood and observed that these tumor-expanded clonotypes were less hypermutated than non-expanded (ubiquitous) clonotypes. Furthermore, we observed a shift in the properties of complementarity-determining region 3 of the BCR heavy chain (CDR-H3) towards less mature and less specific BCR repertoire in tumor-infiltrating B-cells compared to circulating B-cells, which may indicate less stringent control for antibody-producing B cell development in tumor microenvironment (TME). In addition, we found repertoire-level evidence that B-cells may be selected according to their CDR-H3 physicochemical properties before they activate somatic hypermutation (SHM). Altogether, our work outlines a broad picture of the differences in the tumor BCR repertoire relative to non-tumor tissues and points to the unexpected features of the SHM process.