1. Computational and Systems Biology
  2. Neuroscience
Download icon

Spike-timing-dependent ensemble encoding by non-classically responsive cortical neurons

  1. Michele N Insanally
  2. Ioana Carcea
  3. Rachel E Field
  4. Chris C Rodgers
  5. Brian DePasquale
  6. Kanaka Rajan
  7. Michael R DeWeese
  8. Badr F Albanna
  9. Robert C Froemke  Is a corresponding author
  1. New York University School of Medicine, United States
  2. Columbia University, United States
  3. Princeton University, United States
  4. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, United States
  5. University of California, Berkeley, United States
  6. Fordham University, United States
Research Article
  • Cited 8
  • Views 5,740
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2019;8:e42409 doi: 10.7554/eLife.42409

Abstract

Neurons recorded in behaving animals often do not discernibly respond to sensory input and are not overtly task-modulated. These non-classically responsive neurons are difficult to interpret and are typically neglected from analysis, confounding attempts to connect neural activity to perception and behavior. Here we describe a trial-by-trial, spike-timing-based algorithm to reveal the coding capacities of these neurons in auditory and frontal cortex of behaving rats. Classically responsive and non-classically responsive cells contained significant information about sensory stimuli and behavioral decisions. Stimulus category was more accurately represented in frontal cortex than auditory cortex, via ensembles of non-classically responsive cells coordinating the behavioral meaning of spike timings on correct but not error trials. This unbiased approach allows the contribution of all recorded neurons – particularly those without obvious task-related, trial-averaged firing rate modulation – to be assessed for behavioral relevance on single trials.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Michele N Insanally

    Skirball Institute for Biomolecular Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Ioana Carcea

    Skirball Institute for Biomolecular Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Rachel E Field

    Skirball Institute for Biomolecular Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Chris C Rodgers

    Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Brian DePasquale

    Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3830-3184
  6. Kanaka Rajan

    Department of Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Michael R DeWeese

    Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Badr F Albanna

    Department of Natural Sciences, Fordham University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5536-6443
  9. Robert C Froemke

    Skirball Institute for Biomolecular Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    robert.froemke@med.nyu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1230-6811

Funding

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (DC015543)

  • Michele N Insanally

Howard Hughes Medical Institute (Faculty Scholarship)

  • Robert C Froemke

NARSAD

  • Michele N Insanally
  • Ioana Carcea

James McDonnell

  • Kanaka Rajan

Sloan Research Fellowship

  • Robert C Froemke

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (DC009635)

  • Robert C Froemke

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (DC012557)

  • Robert C Froemke

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal procedures were performed in accordance with National Institutes of Health standards and were conducted under a protocol (#160611-03) approved by the New York University School of Medicine Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Stephanie Palmer, University of Chicago, United States

Publication history

  1. Received: September 27, 2018
  2. Accepted: January 27, 2019
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: January 28, 2019 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: February 26, 2019 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2019, Insanally et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,740
    Page views
  • 784
    Downloads
  • 8
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Scopus, Crossref, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Daniël M Pelt
    Insight

    Using multiple human annotators and ensembles of trained networks can improve the performance of deep-learning methods in research.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    Brittany Rosener et al.
    Research Article

    Metabolism of host-targeted drugs by the microbiome can substantially impact host treatment success. However, since many host-targeted drugs inadvertently hamper microbiome growth, repeated drug administration can lead to microbiome evolutionary adaptation. We tested if evolved bacterial resistance against host-targeted drugs alters their drug metabolism and impacts host treatment success. We used a model system of C. elegans, its bacterial diet, and two fluoropyrimidine chemotherapies. Genetic screens revealed that most of loss-of-function resistance mutations in Escherichia coli also reduced drug toxicity in the host. We found that resistance rapidly emerged in E. coli under natural selection and converged to a handful of resistance mechanisms. Surprisingly, we discovered that nutrient availability during bacterial evolution dictated the dietary effect on the host – only bacteria evolving in nutrient-poor media reduced host drug toxicity. Our work suggests that bacteria can rapidly adapt to host-targeted drugs and by doing so may also impact the host.