Spike-timing-dependent ensemble encoding by non-classically responsive cortical neurons

  1. Michele N Insanally
  2. Ioana Carcea
  3. Rachel E Field
  4. Chris C Rodgers
  5. Brian DePasquale
  6. Kanaka Rajan
  7. Michael R DeWeese
  8. Badr F Albanna
  9. Robert C Froemke  Is a corresponding author
  1. New York University School of Medicine, United States
  2. Columbia University, United States
  3. Princeton University, United States
  4. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, United States
  5. University of California, Berkeley, United States
  6. Fordham University, United States

Abstract

Neurons recorded in behaving animals often do not discernibly respond to sensory input and are not overtly task-modulated. These non-classically responsive neurons are difficult to interpret and are typically neglected from analysis, confounding attempts to connect neural activity to perception and behavior. Here we describe a trial-by-trial, spike-timing-based algorithm to reveal the coding capacities of these neurons in auditory and frontal cortex of behaving rats. Classically responsive and non-classically responsive cells contained significant information about sensory stimuli and behavioral decisions. Stimulus category was more accurately represented in frontal cortex than auditory cortex, via ensembles of non-classically responsive cells coordinating the behavioral meaning of spike timings on correct but not error trials. This unbiased approach allows the contribution of all recorded neurons – particularly those without obvious task-related, trial-averaged firing rate modulation – to be assessed for behavioral relevance on single trials.

Data availability

The code and data underlying our analyses are freely available online (https://github.com/badralbanna/Insanally2017)

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Michele N Insanally

    Skirball Institute for Biomolecular Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Ioana Carcea

    Skirball Institute for Biomolecular Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Rachel E Field

    Skirball Institute for Biomolecular Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Chris C Rodgers

    Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Brian DePasquale

    Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3830-3184
  6. Kanaka Rajan

    Department of Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Michael R DeWeese

    Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Badr F Albanna

    Department of Natural Sciences, Fordham University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5536-6443
  9. Robert C Froemke

    Skirball Institute for Biomolecular Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    robert.froemke@med.nyu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1230-6811

Funding

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (DC015543)

  • Michele N Insanally

Howard Hughes Medical Institute (Faculty Scholarship)

  • Robert C Froemke

NARSAD

  • Michele N Insanally
  • Ioana Carcea

James McDonnell

  • Kanaka Rajan

Sloan Research Fellowship

  • Robert C Froemke

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (DC009635)

  • Robert C Froemke

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (DC012557)

  • Robert C Froemke

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal procedures were performed in accordance with National Institutes of Health standards and were conducted under a protocol (#160611-03) approved by the New York University School of Medicine Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Copyright

© 2019, Insanally et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 7,972
    views
  • 999
    downloads
  • 48
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Michele N Insanally
  2. Ioana Carcea
  3. Rachel E Field
  4. Chris C Rodgers
  5. Brian DePasquale
  6. Kanaka Rajan
  7. Michael R DeWeese
  8. Badr F Albanna
  9. Robert C Froemke
(2019)
Spike-timing-dependent ensemble encoding by non-classically responsive cortical neurons
eLife 8:e42409.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42409

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42409

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Computational and Systems Biology
    Rosalyn W Sayaman, Masaru Miyano ... Mark A LaBarge
    Research Article Updated

    Effects from aging in single cells are heterogenous, whereas at the organ- and tissue-levels aging phenotypes tend to appear as stereotypical changes. The mammary epithelium is a bilayer of two major phenotypically and functionally distinct cell lineages: luminal epithelial and myoepithelial cells. Mammary luminal epithelia exhibit substantial stereotypical changes with age that merit attention because these cells are the putative cells-of-origin for breast cancers. We hypothesize that effects from aging that impinge upon maintenance of lineage fidelity increase susceptibility to cancer initiation. We generated and analyzed transcriptomes from primary luminal epithelial and myoepithelial cells from younger <30 (y)ears old and older >55 y women. In addition to age-dependent directional changes in gene expression, we observed increased transcriptional variance with age that contributed to genome-wide loss of lineage fidelity. Age-dependent variant responses were common to both lineages, whereas directional changes were almost exclusively detected in luminal epithelia and involved altered regulation of chromatin and genome organizers such as SATB1. Epithelial expression variance of gap junction protein GJB6 increased with age, and modulation of GJB6 expression in heterochronous co-cultures revealed that it provided a communication conduit from myoepithelial cells that drove directional change in luminal cells. Age-dependent luminal transcriptomes comprised a prominent signal that could be detected in bulk tissue during aging and transition into cancers. A machine learning classifier based on luminal-specific aging distinguished normal from cancer tissue and was highly predictive of breast cancer subtype. We speculate that luminal epithelia are the ultimate site of integration of the variant responses to aging in their surrounding tissue, and that their emergent phenotype both endows cells with the ability to become cancer-cells-of-origin and represents a biosensor that presages cancer susceptibility.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    David B Blumenthal, Marta Lucchetta ... Martin H Schaefer
    Research Article Updated

    Degree distributions in protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks are believed to follow a power law (PL). However, technical and study biases affect the experimental procedures for detecting PPIs. For instance, cancer-associated proteins have received disproportional attention. Moreover, bait proteins in large-scale experiments tend to have many false-positive interaction partners. Studying the degree distributions of thousands of PPI networks of controlled provenance, we address the question if PL distributions in observed PPI networks could be explained by these biases alone. Our findings are supported by mathematical models and extensive simulations, and indicate that study bias and technical bias suffice to produce the observed PL distribution. It is, hence, problematic to derive hypotheses about the topology of the true biological interactome from the PL distributions in observed PPI networks. Our study casts doubt on the use of the PL property of biological networks as a modeling assumption or quality criterion in network biology.