Respiratory Syncytial Virus co-opts host mitochondrial function to favour infectious virus production

  1. MengJie MengJie Hu
  2. Keith E Schulze
  3. Reena Ghildyal
  4. Darren C Henstridge
  5. Jacek L Kolanowski
  6. Elizabeth J New
  7. Yuning Hong
  8. Alan C Hsu
  9. Philip M Hansbro
  10. Peter AB Wark
  11. Marie A Bogoyevitch
  12. David Andrew Jans  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Melbourne, Australia
  2. Monash University, Australia
  3. University of Canberra, Australia
  4. Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Australia
  5. University of Sydney, Australia
  6. La Trobe University, Australia
  7. University of Newcastle, Australia

Abstract

Although respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is responsible for more human deaths each year than influenza, its pathogenic mechanisms are poorly understood. Here high-resolution quantitative imaging, bioenergetics measurements and mitochondrial membrane potential- and redox-sensitive dyes are used to define RSV's impact on host mitochondria for the first time, delineating RSV-induced microtubule/dynein-dependent mitochondrial perinuclear clustering, and translocation towards the microtubule-organizing centre. These changes are concomitant with impaired mitochondrial respiration, loss of mitochondrial membrane potential and increased production of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS). Strikingly, agents that target microtubule integrity the dynein motor protein, or inhibit mitochondrial ROS production strongly suppresses RSV virus production, including in a mouse model with concomitantly reduced virus-induced lung inflammation. The results establish RSV's unique ability to co-opt host cell mitochondria to facilitate viral infection, revealing the RSV-mitochondrial interface for the first time as a viable target for therapeutic intervention.

Data availability

Data are being uploaded to Dryad (DOI: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.2n3162c). Customised scripts for quantitative analyses of mitochondrial distribution and results are publicly available throughhttps://gitlab.erc.monash.edu.au/mmi/mito

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. MengJie MengJie Hu

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7362-1452
  2. Keith E Schulze

    Monash Micro Imaging, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Reena Ghildyal

    Centre for Research in Therapeutic Solutions, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Darren C Henstridge

    Cellular and Molecular Metabolism Laboratory, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Jacek L Kolanowski

    School of Chemistry, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Elizabeth J New

    School of Chemistry, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Yuning Hong

    Department of Chemistry and Physics, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Alan C Hsu

    Priority Research Centre for Healthy Lungs, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6640-0846
  9. Philip M Hansbro

    Priority Research Centre for Healthy Lungs, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Peter AB Wark

    Priority Research Centre for Healthy Lungs, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Marie A Bogoyevitch

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9745-3716
  12. David Andrew Jans

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
    For correspondence
    David.Jans@monash.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5115-4745

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1002486)

  • David Andrew Jans

National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1043511)

  • David Andrew Jans

National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1103050)

  • David Andrew Jans

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Agnieszka Chacinska, University of Warsaw, Poland

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in accordance with The ACT Animal Welfare Act (1992) and the Australian Code of Practice for the Care and use of Animals for Scientific Purposes. The study protocol was approved by the Committee for Ethics in Animal Experimentation of the University of Canberra (project reference number CEAE 14-15).

Human subjects: Primary human bronchial epithelial cells (pBECs) were obtained from 4 healthy individuals who had no history of smoking or lung disease, had normal lung function, and gave written, informed consent to participate and have their data published, in accordance with the procedures in accordance with the procedures approved by the University of Newcastle Human Ethics Committee (project reference no. H-163-1205), in keeping with the guidelines of the National Institutes of Health, American Academy of Allergy and Immunology.

Version history

  1. Received: September 29, 2018
  2. Accepted: June 10, 2019
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: June 27, 2019 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: June 28, 2019 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2019, Hu et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,517
    views
  • 506
    downloads
  • 42
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. MengJie MengJie Hu
  2. Keith E Schulze
  3. Reena Ghildyal
  4. Darren C Henstridge
  5. Jacek L Kolanowski
  6. Elizabeth J New
  7. Yuning Hong
  8. Alan C Hsu
  9. Philip M Hansbro
  10. Peter AB Wark
  11. Marie A Bogoyevitch
  12. David Andrew Jans
(2019)
Respiratory Syncytial Virus co-opts host mitochondrial function to favour infectious virus production
eLife 8:e42448.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42448

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42448

Further reading

    1. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    2. Physics of Living Systems
    Chi Zhang, Rongjing Zhang, Junhua Yuan
    Research Article

    Bacteria in biofilms secrete potassium ions to attract free swimming cells. However, the basis of chemotaxis to potassium remains poorly understood. Here, using a microfluidic device, we found that Escherichia coli can rapidly accumulate in regions of high potassium concentration on the order of millimoles. Using a bead assay, we measured the dynamic response of individual flagellar motors to stepwise changes in potassium concentration, finding that the response resulted from the chemotaxis signaling pathway. To characterize the chemotactic response to potassium, we measured the dose–response curve and adaptation kinetics via an Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) assay, finding that the chemotaxis pathway exhibited a sensitive response and fast adaptation to potassium. We further found that the two major chemoreceptors Tar and Tsr respond differently to potassium. Tar receptors exhibit a biphasic response, whereas Tsr receptors respond to potassium as an attractant. These different responses were consistent with the responses of the two receptors to intracellular pH changes. The sensitive response and fast adaptation allow bacteria to sense and localize small changes in potassium concentration. The differential responses of Tar and Tsr receptors to potassium suggest that cells at different growth stages respond differently to potassium and may have different requirements for potassium.

    1. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Xufeng Xie, Xi Chen ... Yongguo Cao
    Research Article

    Leptospirosis is an emerging infectious disease caused by pathogenic Leptospira spp. Humans and some mammals can develop severe forms of leptospirosis accompanied by a dysregulated inflammatory response, which often results in death. The gut microbiota has been increasingly recognized as a vital element in systemic health. However, the precise role of the gut microbiota in severe leptospirosis is still unknown. Here, we aimed to explore the function and potential mechanisms of the gut microbiota in a hamster model of severe leptospirosis. Our study showed that leptospires were able to multiply in the intestine, cause pathological injury, and induce intestinal and systemic inflammatory responses. 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis revealed that Leptospira infection changed the composition of the gut microbiota of hamsters with an expansion of Proteobacteria. In addition, gut barrier permeability was increased after infection, as reflected by a decrease in the expression of tight junctions. Translocated Proteobacteria were found in the intestinal epithelium of moribund hamsters, as determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization, with elevated lipopolysaccharide (LPS) levels in the serum. Moreover, gut microbiota depletion reduced the survival time, increased the leptospiral load, and promoted the expression of proinflammatory cytokines after Leptospira infection. Intriguingly, fecal filtration and serum from moribund hamsters both increased the transcription of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-10, and TLR4 in macrophages compared with those from uninfected hamsters. These stimulating activities were inhibited by LPS neutralization using polymyxin B. Based on our findings, we identified an LPS neutralization therapy that significantly improved the survival rates in severe leptospirosis when used in combination with antibiotic therapy or polyclonal antibody therapy. In conclusion, our study not only uncovers the role of the gut microbiota in severe leptospirosis but also provides a therapeutic strategy for severe leptospirosis.