Respiratory Syncytial Virus co-opts host mitochondrial function to favour infectious virus production

  1. MengJie MengJie Hu
  2. Keith E Schulze
  3. Reena Ghildyal
  4. Darren C Henstridge
  5. Jacek L Kolanowski
  6. Elizabeth J New
  7. Yuning Hong
  8. Alan C Hsu
  9. Philip M Hansbro
  10. Peter AB Wark
  11. Marie A Bogoyevitch
  12. David Andrew Jans  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Melbourne, Australia
  2. Monash University, Australia
  3. University of Canberra, Australia
  4. Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Australia
  5. University of Sydney, Australia
  6. La Trobe University, Australia
  7. University of Newcastle, Australia

Abstract

Although respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is responsible for more human deaths each year than influenza, its pathogenic mechanisms are poorly understood. Here high-resolution quantitative imaging, bioenergetics measurements and mitochondrial membrane potential- and redox-sensitive dyes are used to define RSV's impact on host mitochondria for the first time, delineating RSV-induced microtubule/dynein-dependent mitochondrial perinuclear clustering, and translocation towards the microtubule-organizing centre. These changes are concomitant with impaired mitochondrial respiration, loss of mitochondrial membrane potential and increased production of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS). Strikingly, agents that target microtubule integrity the dynein motor protein, or inhibit mitochondrial ROS production strongly suppresses RSV virus production, including in a mouse model with concomitantly reduced virus-induced lung inflammation. The results establish RSV's unique ability to co-opt host cell mitochondria to facilitate viral infection, revealing the RSV-mitochondrial interface for the first time as a viable target for therapeutic intervention.

Data availability

Data are being uploaded to Dryad (DOI: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.2n3162c). Customised scripts for quantitative analyses of mitochondrial distribution and results are publicly available throughhttps://gitlab.erc.monash.edu.au/mmi/mito

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. MengJie MengJie Hu

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7362-1452
  2. Keith E Schulze

    Monash Micro Imaging, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Reena Ghildyal

    Centre for Research in Therapeutic Solutions, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Darren C Henstridge

    Cellular and Molecular Metabolism Laboratory, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Jacek L Kolanowski

    School of Chemistry, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Elizabeth J New

    School of Chemistry, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Yuning Hong

    Department of Chemistry and Physics, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Alan C Hsu

    Priority Research Centre for Healthy Lungs, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6640-0846
  9. Philip M Hansbro

    Priority Research Centre for Healthy Lungs, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Peter AB Wark

    Priority Research Centre for Healthy Lungs, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Marie A Bogoyevitch

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9745-3716
  12. David Andrew Jans

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
    For correspondence
    David.Jans@monash.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5115-4745

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1002486)

  • David Andrew Jans

National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1043511)

  • David Andrew Jans

National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1103050)

  • David Andrew Jans

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Agnieszka Chacinska, University of Warsaw, Poland

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in accordance with The ACT Animal Welfare Act (1992) and the Australian Code of Practice for the Care and use of Animals for Scientific Purposes. The study protocol was approved by the Committee for Ethics in Animal Experimentation of the University of Canberra (project reference number CEAE 14-15).

Human subjects: Primary human bronchial epithelial cells (pBECs) were obtained from 4 healthy individuals who had no history of smoking or lung disease, had normal lung function, and gave written, informed consent to participate and have their data published, in accordance with the procedures in accordance with the procedures approved by the University of Newcastle Human Ethics Committee (project reference no. H-163-1205), in keeping with the guidelines of the National Institutes of Health, American Academy of Allergy and Immunology.

Version history

  1. Received: September 29, 2018
  2. Accepted: June 10, 2019
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: June 27, 2019 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: June 28, 2019 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2019, Hu et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,571
    views
  • 514
    downloads
  • 44
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. MengJie MengJie Hu
  2. Keith E Schulze
  3. Reena Ghildyal
  4. Darren C Henstridge
  5. Jacek L Kolanowski
  6. Elizabeth J New
  7. Yuning Hong
  8. Alan C Hsu
  9. Philip M Hansbro
  10. Peter AB Wark
  11. Marie A Bogoyevitch
  12. David Andrew Jans
(2019)
Respiratory Syncytial Virus co-opts host mitochondrial function to favour infectious virus production
eLife 8:e42448.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42448

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42448

Further reading

    1. Epidemiology and Global Health
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Patrick E Brown, Sze Hang Fu ... Ab-C Study Collaborators
    Research Article Updated

    Background:

    Few national-level studies have evaluated the impact of ‘hybrid’ immunity (vaccination coupled with recovery from infection) from the Omicron variants of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).

    Methods:

    From May 2020 to December 2022, we conducted serial assessments (each of ~4000–9000 adults) examining SARS-CoV-2 antibodies within a mostly representative Canadian cohort drawn from a national online polling platform. Adults, most of whom were vaccinated, reported viral test-confirmed infections and mailed self-collected dried blood spots (DBSs) to a central lab. Samples underwent highly sensitive and specific antibody assays to spike and nucleocapsid protein antigens, the latter triggered only by infection. We estimated cumulative SARS-CoV-2 incidence prior to the Omicron period and during the BA.1/1.1 and BA.2/5 waves. We assessed changes in antibody levels and in age-specific active immunity levels.

    Results:

    Spike levels were higher in infected than in uninfected adults, regardless of vaccination doses. Among adults vaccinated at least thrice and infected more than 6 months earlier, spike levels fell notably and continuously for the 9-month post-vaccination. In contrast, among adults infected within 6 months, spike levels declined gradually. Declines were similar by sex, age group, and ethnicity. Recent vaccination attenuated declines in spike levels from older infections. In a convenience sample, spike antibody and cellular responses were correlated. Near the end of 2022, about 35% of adults above age 60 had their last vaccine dose more than 6 months ago, and about 25% remained uninfected. The cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection rose from 13% (95% confidence interval 11–14%) before omicron to 78% (76–80%) by December 2022, equating to 25 million infected adults cumulatively. However, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) weekly death rate during the BA.2/5 waves was less than half of that during the BA.1/1.1 wave, implying a protective role for hybrid immunity.

    Conclusions:

    Strategies to maintain population-level hybrid immunity require up-to-date vaccination coverage, including among those recovering from infection. Population-based, self-collected DBSs are a practicable biological surveillance platform.

    Funding:

    Funding was provided by the COVID-19 Immunity Task Force, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Pfizer Global Medical Grants, and St. Michael’s Hospital Foundation. PJ and ACG are funded by the Canada Research Chairs Program.

    1. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Alejandro Prieto, Luïsa Miró ... Antonio Juarez
    Research Article

    Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a significant threat to human health. Although vaccines have been developed to combat AMR, it has proven challenging to associate specific vaccine antigens with AMR. Bacterial plasmids play a crucial role in the transmission of AMR. Our recent research has identified a group of bacterial plasmids (specifically, IncHI plasmids) that encode large molecular mass proteins containing bacterial immunoglobulin-like domains. These proteins are found on the external surface of the bacterial cells, such as in the flagella or conjugative pili. In this study, we show that these proteins are antigenic and can protect mice from infection caused by an AMR Salmonella strain harboring one of these plasmids. Furthermore, we successfully generated nanobodies targeting these proteins, that were shown to interfere with the conjugative transfer of IncHI plasmids. Considering that these proteins are also encoded in other groups of plasmids, such as IncA/C and IncP2, targeting them could be a valuable strategy in combating AMR infections caused by bacteria harboring different groups of AMR plasmids. Since the selected antigens are directly linked to AMR itself, the protective effect extends beyond specific microorganisms to include all those carrying the corresponding resistance plasmids.