Shank3 Modulates Sleep and Expression of Circadian Transcription Factors

  1. Ashley Ingiosi
  2. Hannah Schoch
  3. Taylor P Wintler
  4. Kristan G Singletary
  5. Dario Righelli
  6. Leandro Roser
  7. Elizabeth Medina
  8. Davide Risso
  9. Marcos G Frank  Is a corresponding author
  10. Lucia Peixoto  Is a corresponding author
  1. Washington State University, United States
  2. National Research Council (CNR), Italy
  3. University of Padova, Italy

Abstract

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is the most prevalent neurodevelopmental disorder in the United States and often co-presents with sleep problems. Sleep problems in ASD predict the severity of ASD core diagnostic symptoms and have a considerable impact on the quality of life of caregivers. Little is known, however, about the underlying molecular mechanisms of sleep problems in ASD. We investigated the role of Shank3, a high confidence ASD gene candidate, in sleep architecture and regulation. We show that mice lacking exon 21 of Shank3 have problems falling asleep even when sleepy. Using RNA-seq we show that sleep deprivation increases the differences in prefrontal cortex gene expression between mutants and wild types, downregulating circadian transcription factors Per3, Bhlhe41, Hlf, Tef, and Nr1d1. Shank3 mutants also have trouble regulating wheel-running activity in constant darkness. Overall, our study shows that Shank3 is an important modulator of sleep and clock gene expression.

Data availability

Sequencing data have been deposited in GEO under accession code GSE113754. Source data files have been provided for Figures 1-4, Tables 1 and 2 and Supplementary Files 1 and 2. The R code used in this article is available on GitHub (github.com/drighelli/peixoto). The R code used for the statistical analysis of RNA-seq and circadian wheel running data is also available in Source Code file 1.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ashley Ingiosi

    Department of Biomedical Science, Washington State University, Spokane, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3035-3010
  2. Hannah Schoch

    Department of Biomedical Science, Washington State University, Spokane, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Taylor P Wintler

    Department of Biomedical Science, Washington State University, Spokane, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Kristan G Singletary

    Department of Biomedical Science, Washington State University, Spokane, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Dario Righelli

    Instituto per le Applicazioni del Calcolo, National Research Council (CNR), Napoli, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1504-3583
  6. Leandro Roser

    Department of Biomedical Science, Washington State University, Spokane, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Elizabeth Medina

    Department of Biomedical Science, Washington State University, Spokane, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Davide Risso

    Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8508-5012
  9. Marcos G Frank

    Department of Biomedical Science, Washington State University, Spokane, United States
    For correspondence
    marcos.frank@wsu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Lucia Peixoto

    Department of Biomedical Science, Washington State University, Spokane, United States
    For correspondence
    lucia.peixoto@wsu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8444-9600

Funding

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K01NS104172)

  • Lucia Peixoto

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols of Washington State University. Protocol numbers: 04705-001 and 04704-001IACUC 6155-Peixoto BreedingIACUC 4705-Peixoto experimentalIACUC 4581-Frank experimental

Human subjects: PMSIR patient data was obtained de-identified under IRB exemption 15005-Peixoto

Copyright

© 2019, Ingiosi et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 6,389
    views
  • 867
    downloads
  • 67
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ashley Ingiosi
  2. Hannah Schoch
  3. Taylor P Wintler
  4. Kristan G Singletary
  5. Dario Righelli
  6. Leandro Roser
  7. Elizabeth Medina
  8. Davide Risso
  9. Marcos G Frank
  10. Lucia Peixoto
(2019)
Shank3 Modulates Sleep and Expression of Circadian Transcription Factors
eLife 8:e42819.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42819

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42819

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Vincent Huson, Wade G Regehr
    Research Article

    Unipolar brush cells (UBCs) are excitatory interneurons in the cerebellar cortex that receive mossy fiber (MF) inputs and excite granule cells. The UBC population responds to brief burst activation of MFs with a continuum of temporal transformations, but it is not known how UBCs transform the diverse range of MF input patterns that occur in vivo. Here, we use cell-attached recordings from UBCs in acute cerebellar slices to examine responses to MF firing patterns that are based on in vivo recordings. We find that MFs evoke a continuum of responses in the UBC population, mediated by three different types of glutamate receptors that each convey a specialized component. AMPARs transmit timing information for single stimuli at up to 5 spikes/s, and for very brief bursts. A combination of mGluR2/3s (inhibitory) and mGluR1s (excitatory) mediates a continuum of delayed, and broadened responses to longer bursts, and to sustained high frequency activation. Variability in the mGluR2/3 component controls the time course of the onset of firing, and variability in the mGluR1 component controls the duration of prolonged firing. We conclude that the combination of glutamate receptor types allows each UBC to simultaneously convey different aspects of MF firing. These findings establish that UBCs are highly flexible circuit elements that provide diverse temporal transformations that are well suited to contribute to specialized processing in different regions of the cerebellar cortex.

    1. Neuroscience
    Nico A Flierman, Sue Ann Koay ... Chris I De Zeeuw
    Research Article

    The role of cerebellum in controlling eye movements is well established, but its contribution to more complex forms of visual behavior has remained elusive. To study cerebellar activity during visual attention we recorded extracellular activity of dentate nucleus (DN) neurons in two non-human primates (NHPs). NHPs were trained to read the direction indicated by a peripheral visual stimulus while maintaining fixation at the center, and report the direction of the cue by performing a saccadic eye movement into the same direction following a delay. We found that single-unit DN neurons modulated spiking activity over the entire time course of the task, and that their activity often bridged temporally separated intra-trial events, yet in a heterogeneous manner. To better understand the heterogeneous relationship between task structure, behavioral performance, and neural dynamics, we constructed a behavioral, an encoding, and a decoding model. Both NHPs showed different behavioral strategies, which influenced the performance. Activity of the DN neurons reflected the unique strategies, with the direction of the visual stimulus frequently being encoded long before an upcoming saccade. Moreover, the latency of the ramping activity of DN neurons following presentation of the visual stimulus was shorter in the better performing NHP. Labeling with the retrograde tracer Cholera Toxin B in the recording location in the DN indicated that these neurons predominantly receive inputs from Purkinje cells in the D1 and D2 zones of the lateral cerebellum as well as neurons of the principal olive and medial pons, all regions known to connect with neurons in the prefrontal cortex contributing to planning of saccades. Together, our results highlight that DN neurons can dynamically modulate their activity during a visual attention task, comprising not only sensorimotor but also cognitive attentional components.