MYOD1 functions as a clock amplifier as well as a critical co-factor for downstream circadian gene expression in muscle

  1. Brian A Hodge
  2. Xiping Zhang
  3. Miguel A Gutierrez-Monreal
  4. Yi Cao
  5. David W Hammers
  6. Zizhen Yao
  7. Christopher A Wolff
  8. Ping Du
  9. Denise Kemler
  10. Andrew R Judge
  11. Karyn A Esser  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Florida, United States
  2. Genentech Inc, United States
  3. Allen Institute for Brain Science, United States

Abstract

In the present study we show that the master myogenic regulatory factor, MYOD1, is a positive modulator of molecular clock amplitude and functions with the core clock factors for expression of clock-controlled genes in skeletal muscle. We demonstrate that MYOD1 directly regulates the expression and circadian amplitude of the positive core clock factor Bmal1. We identify a non-canonical E-box element in Bmal1 and demonstrate that is required for full MYOD1-responsiveness. Bimolecular fluorescence complementation assays demonstrate that MYOD1 colocalizes with both BMAL1 and CLOCK throughout myonuclei. We demonstrate that MYOD1 and BMAL1:CLOCK work in a synergistic fashion through a tandem E-box to regulate the expression and amplitude of the muscle specific clock-controlled gene, Titin-cap (Tcap). In conclusion, these findings reveal mechanistic roles for the muscle specific transcription factor MYOD1 in the regulation of molecular clock amplitude as well as synergistic regulation of clock-controlled genes in skeletal muscle.

Data availability

ChIP seq data for muscle with MyoD is deposited in GEO under accession code GSE122082.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Brian A Hodge

    Department of Physiology and Functional Genomics, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Xiping Zhang

    Department of Physiology and Functional Genomics, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Miguel A Gutierrez-Monreal

    Department of Physiology and Functional Genomics, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Yi Cao

    Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    Yi Cao, Is affiliated with Genentech Inc.. The author has no other competing interests to declare.
  5. David W Hammers

    Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Zizhen Yao

    Cell Types Program, Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Christopher A Wolff

    Department of Physiology and Functional Genomics, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Ping Du

    Department of Physiology and Functional Genomics, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Denise Kemler

    Department of Physiology and Functional Genomics, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Andrew R Judge

    Department of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Karyn A Esser

    Department of Physiology and Functional Genomics, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States
    For correspondence
    kaesser@ufl.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5791-1441

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01AR066082)

  • Karyn A Esser

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Andrew Brack, University of California, San Francisco, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (IACUC Study 201809136) of the University of Florida.

Version history

  1. Received: October 19, 2018
  2. Accepted: February 20, 2019
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: February 21, 2019 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: March 4, 2019 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2019, Hodge et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,758
    views
  • 530
    downloads
  • 50
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Brian A Hodge
  2. Xiping Zhang
  3. Miguel A Gutierrez-Monreal
  4. Yi Cao
  5. David W Hammers
  6. Zizhen Yao
  7. Christopher A Wolff
  8. Ping Du
  9. Denise Kemler
  10. Andrew R Judge
  11. Karyn A Esser
(2019)
MYOD1 functions as a clock amplifier as well as a critical co-factor for downstream circadian gene expression in muscle
eLife 8:e43017.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.43017

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.43017

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Alex Weiss, Cassandra D'Amata ... Madeline N Hayes
    Research Article

    High-throughput vertebrate animal model systems for the study of patient-specific biology and new therapeutic approaches for aggressive brain tumors are currently lacking, and new approaches are urgently needed. Therefore, to build a patient-relevant in vivo model of human glioblastoma, we expressed common oncogenic variants including activated human EGFRvIII and PI3KCAH1047R under the control of the radial glial-specific promoter her4.1 in syngeneic tp53 loss-of-function mutant zebrafish. Robust tumor formation was observed prior to 45 days of life, and tumors had a gene expression signature similar to human glioblastoma of the mesenchymal subtype, with a strong inflammatory component. Within early stage tumor lesions, and in an in vivo and endogenous tumor microenvironment, we visualized infiltration of phagocytic cells, as well as internalization of tumor cells by mpeg1.1:EGFP+ microglia/macrophages, suggesting negative regulatory pressure by pro-inflammatory cell types on tumor growth at early stages of glioblastoma initiation. Furthermore, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene targeting of master inflammatory transcription factors irf7 or irf8 led to increased tumor formation in the primary context, while suppression of phagocyte activity led to enhanced tumor cell engraftment following transplantation into otherwise immune-competent zebrafish hosts. Altogether, we developed a genetically relevant model of aggressive human glioblastoma and harnessed the unique advantages of zebrafish including live imaging, high-throughput genetic and chemical manipulations to highlight important tumor-suppressive roles for the innate immune system on glioblastoma initiation, with important future opportunities for therapeutic discovery and optimizations.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Ian Lorimer
    Insight

    Establishing a zebrafish model of a deadly type of brain tumor highlights the role of the immune system in the early stages of the disease.