High resolution cryo-EM structure of the helical RNA-bound Hantaan virus nucleocapsid reveals its assembly mechanisms

  1. Benoît Arragain
  2. Juan Reguera
  3. Ambroise Desfosses
  4. Irina Gutsche
  5. Guy Schoehn  Is a corresponding author
  6. Hélène Malet  Is a corresponding author
  1. Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, CEA, Institute for Structural Biology (IBS), France
  2. Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, INSERM, AFMB UMR 7257, 13288, France

Abstract

Negative-strand RNA viruses condense their genome into helical nucleocapsids that constitute essential templates for viral replication and transcription. The intrinsic flexibility of nucleocapsids usually prevents their full-length structural characterization at high resolution. Here we describe purification of full-length recombinant metastable helical nucleocapsid of Hantaan virus (Hantaviridae family, Bunyavirales order) and determine its structure at 3.3 Å resolution by cryo-electron microscopy. The structure reveals the mechanisms of helical multimerization via sub-domain exchanges between protomers and highlights nucleotide positions in a continuous positively charged groove compatible with viral genome binding. It uncovers key sites for future structure-based design of antivirals that are currently lacking to counteract life-threatening hantavirus infections. The structure also suggests a model of nucleoprotein-polymerase interaction that would enable replication and transcription solely upon local disruption of the nucleocapsid.

Data availability

The cryo-EM has been deposited in EMDB under the accession code EMD-0333.The atomic coordinates have been deposited in PDB under the accession code 6I2N.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Benoît Arragain

    Electron Microscopy and Methods Group, Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, CEA, Institute for Structural Biology (IBS), Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5593-4682
  2. Juan Reguera

    Complexes Macromoléculaires Viraux, Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, INSERM, AFMB UMR 7257, 13288, Marseille, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Ambroise Desfosses

    Electron Microscopy and Methods Group, Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, CEA, Institute for Structural Biology (IBS), Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Irina Gutsche

    Electron Microscopy and Methods Group, Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, CEA, Institute for Structural Biology (IBS), Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1908-3921
  5. Guy Schoehn

    Electron Microscopy and Methods Group, Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, CEA, Institute for Structural Biology (IBS), Grenoble, France
    For correspondence
    guy.schoehn@ibs.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Hélène Malet

    Electron Microscopy and Methods Group, Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, CEA, Institute for Structural Biology (IBS), Grenoble, France
    For correspondence
    helene.malet@ibs.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2834-7386

Funding

IDEX IRS grant University of Grenoble (G7H-IRS17H50)

  • Hélène Malet

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Edward H Egelman, University of Virginia, United States

Version history

  1. Received: October 23, 2018
  2. Accepted: January 10, 2019
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: January 14, 2019 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: February 6, 2019 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2019, Arragain et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,913
    views
  • 631
    downloads
  • 30
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Benoît Arragain
  2. Juan Reguera
  3. Ambroise Desfosses
  4. Irina Gutsche
  5. Guy Schoehn
  6. Hélène Malet
(2019)
High resolution cryo-EM structure of the helical RNA-bound Hantaan virus nucleocapsid reveals its assembly mechanisms
eLife 8:e43075.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.43075

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.43075

Further reading

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Hitendra Negi, Aravind Ravichandran ... Ranabir Das
    Research Article Updated

    The proteasome controls levels of most cellular proteins, and its activity is regulated under stress, quiescence, and inflammation. However, factors determining the proteasomal degradation rate remain poorly understood. Proteasome substrates are conjugated with small proteins (tags) like ubiquitin and Fat10 to target them to the proteasome. It is unclear if the structural plasticity of proteasome-targeting tags can influence substrate degradation. Fat10 is upregulated during inflammation, and its substrates undergo rapid proteasomal degradation. We report that the degradation rate of Fat10 substrates critically depends on the structural plasticity of Fat10. While the ubiquitin tag is recycled at the proteasome, Fat10 is degraded with the substrate. Our results suggest significantly lower thermodynamic stability and faster mechanical unfolding in Fat10 compared to ubiquitin. Long-range salt bridges are absent in the Fat10 structure, creating a plastic protein with partially unstructured regions suitable for proteasome engagement. Fat10 plasticity destabilizes substrates significantly and creates partially unstructured regions in the substrate to enhance degradation. NMR-relaxation-derived order parameters and temperature dependence of chemical shifts identify the Fat10-induced partially unstructured regions in the substrate, which correlated excellently to Fat10-substrate contacts, suggesting that the tag-substrate collision destabilizes the substrate. These results highlight a strong dependence of proteasomal degradation on the structural plasticity and thermodynamic properties of the proteasome-targeting tags.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Kien Xuan Ngo, Huong T Vu ... Taro Uyeda
    Research Article

    The mechanism underlying the preferential and cooperative binding of cofilin and the expansion of clusters toward the pointed-end side of actin filaments remains poorly understood. To address this, we conducted a principal component analysis based on available filamentous actin (F-actin) and C-actin (cofilins were excluded from cofilactin) structures and compared to monomeric G-actin. The results strongly suggest that C-actin, rather than F-ADP-actin, represented the favourable structure for binding preference of cofilin. High-speed atomic force microscopy explored that the shortened bare half helix adjacent to the cofilin clusters on the pointed end side included fewer actin protomers than normal helices. The mean axial distance (MAD) between two adjacent actin protomers along the same long-pitch strand within shortened bare half helices was longer (5.0–6.3 nm) than the MAD within typical helices (4.3–5.6 nm). The inhibition of torsional motion during helical twisting, achieved through stronger attachment to the lipid membrane, led to more pronounced inhibition of cofilin binding and cluster formation than the presence of inorganic phosphate (Pi) in solution. F-ADP-actin exhibited more naturally supertwisted half helices than F-ADP.Pi-actin, explaining how Pi inhibits cofilin binding to F-actin with variable helical twists. We propose that protomers within the shorter bare helical twists, either influenced by thermal fluctuation or induced allosterically by cofilin clusters, exhibit characteristics of C-actin-like structures with an elongated MAD, leading to preferential and cooperative binding of cofilin.