1. Neuroscience
Download icon

Decoupling sensory from decisional choice biases in perceptual decision making

  1. Daniel Linares  Is a corresponding author
  2. David Aguilar-Lleyda
  3. Joan López-Moliner
  1. Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Spain
  2. Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, France
  3. Universitat de Barcelona, Spain
Research Article
  • Cited 2
  • Views 1,630
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2019;8:e43994 doi: 10.7554/eLife.43994

Abstract

The contribution of sensory and decisional processes to perceptual decision making is still unclear, even in simple perceptual tasks. When decision makers need to select an action from a set of balanced alternatives, any tendency to choose one alternative more often—choice bias—is consistent with a bias in the sensory evidence, but also with a preference to select that alternative independently of the sensory evidence. To decouple sensory from decisional biases, here we asked humans to perform a simple perceptual discrimination task with two symmetric alternatives under two different task instructions. The instructions varied the response mapping between perception and the category of the alternatives. We found that from 32 participants, 30 exhibited sensory biases and 15 decisional biases. The decisional biases were consistent with a criterion change in a simple signal detection theory model. Perceptual decision making, thus, even in simple scenarios, is affected by sensory and decisional choice biases.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Daniel Linares

    Theoretical Neurobiology of Cortical Circuits, Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
    For correspondence
    danilinares@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7473-4184
  2. David Aguilar-Lleyda

    Centre d'Économie de la Sorbonne, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6963-4069
  3. Joan López-Moliner

    Department of Cognition, Development and Psychology of Education, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Departament de Salut of the Generalitat de Catalunya (SLT002/16/00338)

  • Daniel Linares

Catalan Government (2017SGR-48)

  • Joan López-Moliner

Fudación Alicia Koplowitz

  • Daniel Linares

Project AEI/Feder, UE (PSI2017-83493R)

  • Joan López-Moliner

Departament de Salut of the Generalitat de Catalunya (SLT006/17/00362)

  • Daniel Linares

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: The study was approved by the ethical committee of the University of Barcelona (IRB00003099) and followed the requirements of the Helsinki convention. The participants, who did not know the hypothesis of the experiments, provided written consent to perform the experiments.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Maik C Stüttgen, University Medical Center Mainz, Germany

Publication history

  1. Received: November 28, 2018
  2. Accepted: March 23, 2019
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: March 27, 2019 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: April 11, 2019 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2019, Linares et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,630
    Page views
  • 277
    Downloads
  • 2
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)