Abstract

Detecting rapid, coincident changes across sensory modalities is essential for recognition of sudden threats or events. Using two-photon calcium imaging in identified cell types in awake, head-fixed mice, we show that, among the basic features of a sound envelope, loud sound onsets are a dominant feature coded by the auditory cortex neurons projecting to primary visual cortex (V1). In V1, a small number of layer 1 interneurons gates this cross-modal information flow in a context-dependent manner. In dark conditions, auditory cortex inputs lead to suppression of the V1 population. However, when sound input coincides with a visual stimulus, visual responses are boosted in V1, most strongly after loud sound onsets. Thus, a dynamic, asymmetric circuit connecting AC and V1 contributes to the encoding of visual events that are coincident with sounds.

Data availability

Data and software availability. The data that support the findings of this study are freely available at https://www.bathellier-lab.org/downloads or at Dryad, doi:10.5061/dryad.82r5q83. Custom analysis scripts are available as a source code file.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Deneux Thomas

    Paris-Saclay Institute of Neuroscience, CNRS, Gif sur Yvette, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Evan R Harrell

    Paris-Saclay Institute of Neuroscience, CNRS, Gif sur Yvette, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Alexandre Kempf

    Paris-Saclay Institute of Neuroscience, CNRS, Gif sur Yvette, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Sebastian Ceballo

    Paris-Saclay Institute of Neuroscience, CNRS, Gif sur Yvette, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Anton Filipchuk

    Paris Saclay Institute of Neuroscience, CNRS, Gif sur Yvette, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Brice Bathellier

    Paris-Saclay Institute of Neuroscience, CNRS, Gif sur Yvette, France
    For correspondence
    brice.bathellier@cnrs.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9211-1960

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (Retour Postdoc)

  • Deneux Thomas
  • Brice Bathellier

Human Frontier Science Program (CDA)

  • Evan R Harrell
  • Brice Bathellier

H2020 European Research Council (ERC CoG)

  • Alexandre Kempf
  • Sebastian Ceballo
  • Anton Filipchuk
  • Brice Bathellier

Seventh Framework Programme (Marie Curie CiG)

  • Brice Bathellier

Fondation pour l'Audition (Lab grant)

  • Evan R Harrell
  • Brice Bathellier

École Doctorale Frontières du Vivant - Programme Bettencourt (Phd fellowship)

  • Alexandre Kempf

Paris-Saclay University (NeuroSaclay Brainscopes)

  • Brice Bathellier

Ecole des Neurosciences de Paris (Phd fellowship)

  • Sebastian Ceballo

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal procedures were approved by the French Ethical Committee (authorization 00275.01).

Copyright

© 2019, Thomas et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,083
    views
  • 633
    downloads
  • 67
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Deneux Thomas
  2. Evan R Harrell
  3. Alexandre Kempf
  4. Sebastian Ceballo
  5. Anton Filipchuk
  6. Brice Bathellier
(2019)
Context-dependent signaling of coincident auditory and visual events in primary visual cortex
eLife 8:e44006.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44006

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44006

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Suelen Pereira, Ivan Tomsic ... Mychael V Lourenco
    Insight

    A dysfunctional signaling pathway in the hippocampus has been linked to chronic pain-related memory impairment in mice.

    1. Neuroscience
    Ilya A Rybak, Natalia A Shevtsova ... Alain Frigon
    Research Advance

    Locomotion is controlled by spinal circuits that interact with supraspinal drives and sensory feedback from the limbs. These sensorimotor interactions are disrupted following spinal cord injury. The thoracic lateral hemisection represents an experimental model of an incomplete spinal cord injury, where connections between the brain and spinal cord are abolished on one side of the cord. To investigate the effects of such an injury on the operation of the spinal locomotor network, we used our computational model of cat locomotion recently published in eLife (Rybak et al., 2024) to investigate and predict changes in cycle and phase durations following a thoracic lateral hemisection during treadmill locomotion in tied-belt (equal left-right speeds) and split-belt (unequal left-right speeds) conditions. In our simulations, the ‘hemisection’ was always applied to the right side. Based on our model, we hypothesized that following hemisection the contralesional (‘intact’, left) side of the spinal network is mostly controlled by supraspinal drives, whereas the ipsilesional (‘hemisected’, right) side is mostly controlled by somatosensory feedback. We then compared the simulated results with those obtained during experiments in adult cats before and after a mid-thoracic lateral hemisection on the right side in the same locomotor conditions. Our experimental results confirmed many effects of hemisection on cat locomotion predicted by our simulations. We show that having the ipsilesional hindlimb step on the slow belt, but not the fast belt, during split-belt locomotion substantially reduces the effects of lateral hemisection. The model provides explanations for changes in temporal characteristics of hindlimb locomotion following hemisection based on altered interactions between spinal circuits, supraspinal drives, and somatosensory feedback.