Dynamic enhancer partitioning instructs activation of a growth-related gene during exit from naïve pluripotency

  1. Maxim Van Cleef Greenberg  Is a corresponding author
  2. Aurélie Teissandier
  3. Marius Walter
  4. Daan Noordermeer
  5. Deborah Bourc'his  Is a corresponding author
  1. Institut Curie, France
  2. The Buck Institute for Research on Aging, United States
  3. Université Paris-Saclay, France

Abstract

During early mammalian development, the chromatin landscape undergoes profound transitions. The Zdbf2 gene-involved in growth control-provides a valuable model to study this window: upon exit from naïve pluripotency and prior to tissue differentiation, it undergoes a switch from a distal to a proximal promoter usage, accompanied by a switch from polycomb to DNA methylation occupancy. Using an embryonic stem cell (ESC) system to mimic this period, we show here that four enhancers contribute to the Zdbf2 promoter switch, concomitantly with dynamic changes in chromatin architecture. In ESCs, the locus is partitioned to facilitate enhancer contacts with the distal Zdbf2 promoter. Relieving the partition enhances proximal Zdbf2 promoter activity, as observed during differentiation or with genetic mutants. Importantly, we show that 3D regulation occurs upstream of the polycomb and DNA methylation pathways. Our study reveals the importance of multi-layered regulatory frameworks to ensure proper spatio-temporal activation of developmentally important genes.

Data availability

Sequencing data have been deposited in GEO under accession code GSE121405.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Maxim Van Cleef Greenberg

    Unité de Génétique et Biologie du Développement, Institut Curie, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    maxim.greenberg@curie.fr
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9935-8763
  2. Aurélie Teissandier

    Department of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Marius Walter

    The Buck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Daan Noordermeer

    Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), Université Paris-Saclay, Gif sur Yvette, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Deborah Bourc'his

    Unité de Génétique et Biologie du Développement, Institut Curie, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    Deborah.Bourchis@curie.fr
    Competing interests
    Deborah Bourc'his, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9499-7291

Funding

H2020 European Research Council (Cog EpiRepro)

  • Deborah Bourc'his

European Molecular Biology Organization (LTF 457-2013)

  • Maxim Van Cleef Greenberg

Fondation ARC pour la Recherche sur le Cancer (Post-doc Fellowship)

  • Maxim Van Cleef Greenberg

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2019, Greenberg et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,535
    views
  • 400
    downloads
  • 12
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Maxim Van Cleef Greenberg
  2. Aurélie Teissandier
  3. Marius Walter
  4. Daan Noordermeer
  5. Deborah Bourc'his
(2019)
Dynamic enhancer partitioning instructs activation of a growth-related gene during exit from naïve pluripotency
eLife 8:e44057.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44057

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44057

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Bethany M Bartlett, Yatendra Kumar ... Wendy A Bickmore
    Research Article Updated

    During oncogene-induced senescence there are striking changes in the organisation of heterochromatin in the nucleus. This is accompanied by activation of a pro-inflammatory gene expression programme – the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) – driven by transcription factors such as NF-κB. The relationship between heterochromatin re-organisation and the SASP has been unclear. Here, we show that TPR, a protein of the nuclear pore complex basket required for heterochromatin re-organisation during senescence, is also required for the very early activation of NF-κB signalling during the stress-response phase of oncogene-induced senescence. This is prior to activation of the SASP and occurs without affecting NF-κB nuclear import. We show that TPR is required for the activation of innate immune signalling at these early stages of senescence and we link this to the formation of heterochromatin-enriched cytoplasmic chromatin fragments thought to bleb off from the nuclear periphery. We show that HMGA1 is also required for cytoplasmic chromatin fragment formation. Together these data suggest that re-organisation of heterochromatin is involved in altered structural integrity of the nuclear periphery during senescence, and that this can lead to activation of cytoplasmic nucleic acid sensing, NF-κB signalling, and activation of the SASP.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Timothy Fuqua, Yiqiao Sun, Andreas Wagner
    Research Article

    Gene regulation is essential for life and controlled by regulatory DNA. Mutations can modify the activity of regulatory DNA, and also create new regulatory DNA, a process called regulatory emergence. Non-regulatory and regulatory DNA contain motifs to which transcription factors may bind. In prokaryotes, gene expression requires a stretch of DNA called a promoter, which contains two motifs called –10 and –35 boxes. However, these motifs may occur in both promoters and non-promoter DNA in multiple copies. They have been implicated in some studies to improve promoter activity, and in others to repress it. Here, we ask whether the presence of such motifs in different genetic sequences influences promoter evolution and emergence. To understand whether and how promoter motifs influence promoter emergence and evolution, we start from 50 ‘promoter islands’, DNA sequences enriched with –10 and –35 boxes. We mutagenize these starting ‘parent’ sequences, and measure gene expression driven by 240,000 of the resulting mutants. We find that the probability that mutations create an active promoter varies more than 200-fold, and is not correlated with the number of promoter motifs. For parent sequences without promoter activity, mutations created over 1500 new –10 and –35 boxes at unique positions in the library, but only ~0.3% of these resulted in de-novo promoter activity. Only ~13% of all –10 and –35 boxes contribute to de-novo promoter activity. For parent sequences with promoter activity, mutations created new –10 and –35 boxes in 11 specific positions that partially overlap with preexisting ones to modulate expression. We also find that –10 and –35 boxes do not repress promoter activity. Overall, our work demonstrates how promoter motifs influence promoter emergence and evolution. It has implications for predicting and understanding regulatory evolution, de novo genes, and phenotypic evolution.