1. Developmental Biology
  2. Neuroscience
Download icon

Transcriptomic and epigenetic regulation of hair cell regeneration in the mouse utricle and its potentiation by Atoh1

  1. Hsin-I Jen
  2. Matthew C Hill
  3. Litao Tao
  4. Kuanwei Sheng
  5. Wenjian Cao
  6. Hongyuan Zhang
  7. Haoze V Yu
  8. Juan Llamas
  9. Chenghang Zong
  10. James F Martin
  11. Neil Segil
  12. Andrew K Groves  Is a corresponding author
  1. Baylor College of Medicine, United States
  2. University of Southern California, United States
Research Article
  • Cited 15
  • Views 3,346
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2019;8:e44328 doi: 10.7554/eLife.44328

Abstract

The mammalian cochlea loses its ability to regenerate new hair cells prior to the onset of hearing. In contrast, the adult vestibular system can produce new hair cells in response to damage, or by reprogramming of supporting cells with the hair cell transcription factor Atoh1. We used RNA-seq and ATAC-seq to probe the transcriptional and epigenetic responses of utricle supporting cells to damage and Atoh1 transduction. We show that the improved regenerative response of the utricle correlates with a more accessible chromatin structure in utricle supporting cells compared to their cochlear counterparts. We also provide evidence that Atoh1 transduction of supporting cells is able to promote increased transcriptional accessibility of some hair cell genes. Our study offers a possible explanation for regenerative differences between sensory organs of the inner ear, but shows that additional factors to Atoh1 may be required for optimal reprogramming of hair cell fate.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Hsin-I Jen

    Program in Developmental Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  2. Matthew C Hill

    Program in Developmental Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  3. Litao Tao

    Department of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  4. Kuanwei Sheng

    Program Integrative Molecular and Biomedical Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  5. Wenjian Cao

    Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  6. Hongyuan Zhang

    Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  7. Haoze V Yu

    Department of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  8. Juan Llamas

    Department of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  9. Chenghang Zong

    Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  10. James F Martin

    Program in Developmental Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  11. Neil Segil

    Department of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  12. Andrew K Groves

    Program in Developmental Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    For correspondence
    akgroves@bcm.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0784-7998

Funding

National Cancer Institute (CA125123)

  • Andrew K Groves

Vivian L Smith Foundation and MacDonald Research Fund Award (16RDM001)

  • James F Martin

Transatlantic Network of Excellence Award LeDucq Foundation Transatlantic Networks of Excellence in Cardiovascular Research (14CVD01)

  • James F Martin

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (RO1DC014832)

  • Andrew K Groves

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (RO1DC015829)

  • Neil Segil

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (RO1DE023177)

  • James F Martin

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (RO1HL127717)

  • James F Martin

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (RO1HL130804)

  • James F Martin

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (RO1HL118761)

  • James F Martin

National Institutes of Health (DP2EB020399)

  • Chenghang Zong

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (F31HL136065)

  • Matthew C Hill

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (AN-4956) of Baylor College of Medicine

Reviewing Editor

  1. Francois Guillemot, The Francis Crick Institute, United Kingdom

Publication history

  1. Received: December 12, 2018
  2. Accepted: April 28, 2019
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: April 29, 2019 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: May 7, 2019 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2019, Jen et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,346
    Page views
  • 512
    Downloads
  • 15
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Scopus, Crossref, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Categories and tags

Research organism

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Plant Biology

    Epigenetic reprogramming rewires transcription during the alternation of generations in Arabidopsis

    Michael Borg et al.
    Research Article

    Alternation between morphologically distinct haploid and diploid life forms is a defining feature of most plant and algal life cycles, yet the underlying molecular mechanisms that govern these transitions remain unclear. Here, we explore the dynamic relationship between chromatin accessibility and epigenetic modifications during life form transitions in Arabidopsis. The diploid-to-haploid life form transition is governed by the loss of H3K9me2 and DNA demethylation of transposon-associated cis-regulatory elements. This event is associated with dramatic changes in chromatin accessibility and transcriptional reprogramming. In contrast, the global loss of H3K27me3 in the haploid form shapes a chromatin accessibility landscape that is poised to re-initiate the transition back to diploid life after fertilization. Hence, distinct epigenetic reprogramming events rewire transcription through major reorganization of the regulatory epigenome to guide the alternation of generations in flowering plants.

    1. Developmental Biology

    Runx2-Twist1 interaction coordinates cranial neural crest guidance of soft palate myogenesis

    Xia Han et al.
    Research Article

    Cranial neural crest (CNC) cells give rise to bone, cartilage, tendons, and ligaments of the vertebrate craniofacial musculoskeletal complex, as well as regulate mesoderm-derived craniofacial muscle development through cell-cell interactions. Using the mouse soft palate as a model, we performed an unbiased single-cell RNA-seq analysis to investigate the heterogeneity and lineage commitment of CNC derivatives during craniofacial muscle development. We show that Runx2, a known osteogenic regulator, is expressed in the CNC-derived perimysial and progenitor populations. Loss of Runx2 in CNC-derivatives results in reduced expression of perimysial markers (Aldh1a2 and Hic1) as well as soft palate muscle defects in Osr2-Cre;Runx2fl/fl mice. We further reveal that Runx2 maintains perimysial marker expression through suppressing Twist1, and that myogenesis is restored in Osr2-Cre;Runx2fl/fl;Twist1fl/+ mice. Collectively, our findings highlight the roles of Runx2, Twist1, and their interaction in regulating the fate of CNC-derived cells as they guide craniofacial muscle development through cell-cell interactions.

    1. Developmental Biology

    Reciprocal interaction between mesenchymal stem cells and transit amplifying cells regulates tissue homeostasis

    Junjun Jing et al.
    Research Article

    Interaction between adult stem cells and their progeny is critical for tissue homeostasis and regeneration. In multiple organs, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) give rise to transit amplifying cells (TACs), which then differentiate into different cell types. However, whether and how MSCs interact with TACs remains unknown. Using the adult mouse incisor as a model, we present in vivo evidence that TACs and MSCs have distinct genetic programs and engage in reciprocal signaling cross talk to maintain tissue homeostasis. Specifically, an IGF-WNT signaling cascade is involved in the feedforward from MSCs to TACs. TACs are regulated by tissue-autonomous canonical WNT signaling and can feedback to MSCs and regulate MSC maintenance via Wnt5a/Ror2-mediated non-canonical WNT signaling. Collectively, these findings highlight the importance of coordinated bidirectional signaling interaction between MSCs and TACs in instructing mesenchymal tissue homeostasis, and the mechanisms identified here have important implications for MSC–TAC interaction in other organs.