Decoys provide a scalable platform for identification of plant E3 ubiquitin ligases that regulate circadian function

  1. Ann Feke
  2. Wei Liu
  3. Jing Hong
  4. Man-Wah Li
  5. Chin-Mei Lee
  6. Elton K Zhou
  7. Joshua M Gendron  Is a corresponding author
  1. Yale University, United States
  2. South China University of Technology, China

Abstract

The circadian clock relies on regulated degradation of clock proteins to maintain rhythmicity. Despite this, we know few components that mediate protein degradation. This is due to high levels of functional redundancy within plant E3 ubiquitin ligase families. In order to overcome this issue and discover E3 ubiquitin ligases that control circadian function, we generated a library of transgenic Arabidopsis plants expressing dominant-negative 'decoy' E3 ubiquitin ligases. We determined their effects on the circadian clock and identified dozens of new potential regulators of circadian function. To demonstrate the potency of the decoy screening methodology to overcome redundancy and identify bona fide clock regulators, we performed follow-up studies on MAC3A (PUB59) and MAC3B (PUB60). We show that they redundantly control circadian period by regulating splicing. This work demonstrates the viability of ubiquitin ligase decoys as a screening platform to overcome genetic challenges and discover E3 ubiquitin ligases that regulate plant development.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data is provided for Figures 2,3,4,6, S1 and S2.

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ann Feke

    Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Wei Liu

    Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Jing Hong

    School of Food Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Man-Wah Li

    Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Chin-Mei Lee

    Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3870-4268
  6. Elton K Zhou

    Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Joshua M Gendron

    Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    For correspondence
    joshua.gendron@yale.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8605-3047

Funding

National Science Foundation (EAGER #1548538)

  • Joshua M Gendron

National Institutes of Health (R35 GM128670)

  • Joshua M Gendron

Gruber Foundation

  • Ann Feke

Rudolph J. Anderson Fund

  • Chin-Mei Lee

Forest B.H. and Elizabeth D.W. Brown Fund

  • Wei Liu
  • Chin-Mei Lee

National Science Foundation (GRFP DGE-1122492)

  • Ann Feke

National Institutes of Health (T32 GM007499)

  • Ann Feke

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Jürgen Kleine-Vehn, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Austria

Version history

  1. Received: December 20, 2018
  2. Accepted: April 4, 2019
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: April 5, 2019 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: April 25, 2019 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2019, Feke et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,579
    Page views
  • 649
    Downloads
  • 17
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ann Feke
  2. Wei Liu
  3. Jing Hong
  4. Man-Wah Li
  5. Chin-Mei Lee
  6. Elton K Zhou
  7. Joshua M Gendron
(2019)
Decoys provide a scalable platform for identification of plant E3 ubiquitin ligases that regulate circadian function
eLife 8:e44558.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44558

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44558

Further reading

    1. Ecology
    2. Plant Biology
    Jamie Mitchel Waterman, Tristan Michael Cofer ... Matthias Erb
    Research Article

    Volatiles emitted by herbivore-attacked plants (senders) can enhance defenses in neighboring plants (receivers), however, the temporal dynamics of this phenomenon remain poorly studied. Using a custom-built, high-throughput proton transfer reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometry (PTR-ToF-MS) system, we explored temporal patterns of volatile transfer and responses between herbivore-attacked and undamaged maize plants. We found that continuous exposure to natural blends of herbivore-induced volatiles results in clocked temporal response patterns in neighboring plants, characterized by an induced terpene burst at the onset of the second day of exposure. This delayed burst is not explained by terpene accumulation during the night, but coincides with delayed jasmonate accumulation in receiver plants. The delayed burst occurs independent of day:night light transitions and cannot be fully explained by sender volatile dynamics. Instead, it is the result of a stress memory from volatile exposure during the first day and secondary exposure to bioactive volatiles on the second day. Our study reveals that prolonged exposure to natural blends of stress-induced volatiles results in a response that integrates priming and direct induction into a distinct and predictable temporal response pattern. This provides an answer to the long-standing question of whether stress volatiles predominantly induce or prime plant defenses in neighboring plants, by revealing that they can do both in sequence.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Plant Biology
    Maciek Adamowski, Ivana Matijević, Jiří Friml
    Research Article

    The GNOM (GN) Guanine nucleotide Exchange Factor for ARF small GTPases (ARF-GEF) is among the best studied trafficking regulators in plants, playing crucial and unique developmental roles in patterning and polarity. The current models place GN at the Golgi apparatus (GA), where it mediates secretion/recycling, and at the plasma membrane (PM) presumably contributing to clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME). The mechanistic basis of the developmental function of GN, distinct from the other ARF-GEFs including its closest homologue GNOM-LIKE1 (GNL1), remains elusive. Insights from this study largely extend the current notions of GN function. We show that GN, but not GNL1, localizes to the cell periphery at long-lived structures distinct from clathrin-coated pits, while CME and secretion proceed normally in gn knockouts. The functional GN mutant variant GNfewerroots, absent from the GA, suggests that the cell periphery is the major site of GN action responsible for its developmental function. Following inhibition by Brefeldin A, GN, but not GNL1, relocates to the PM likely on exocytic vesicles, suggesting selective molecular associations en route to the cell periphery. A study of GN-GNL1 chimeric ARF-GEFs indicates that all GN domains contribute to the specific GN function in a partially redundant manner. Together, this study offers significant steps toward the elucidation of the mechanism underlying unique cellular and development functions of GNOM.