Conformational dynamics between transmembrane domains and allosteric modulation of a metabotropic glutamate receptor

  1. Vanessa A Gutzeit
  2. Jordana Thibado
  3. Daniel Starer Stor
  4. Zhou Zhou
  5. Scott C Blanchard
  6. Olaf S Andersen
  7. Joshua Levitz  Is a corresponding author
  1. Weill Cornell Graduate School of Medical Sciences, United States
  2. Weill Cornell Medicine, United States

Abstract

Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) are class C, synaptic G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that contain large extracellular ligand binding domains (LBDs) and form constitutive dimers. Despite the existence of a detailed picture of inter-LBD conformational dynamics and structural snapshots of both isolated domains and full-length receptors, it remains unclear how mGluR activation proceeds at the level of the transmembrane domains (TMDs) and how TMD-targeting allosteric drugs exert their effects. Here we use time-resolved functional and conformational assays to dissect the mechanisms by which allosteric drugs activate and modulate mGluR2. Single-molecule subunit counting and inter-TMD fluorescence resonance energy transfer measurements in living cells reveal LBD-independent conformational rearrangements between TMD dimers during receptor modulation. Using these assays along with functional readouts, we uncover heterogeneity in the magnitude, direction, and the timing of the action of both positive and negative allosteric drugs. Together our experiments lead to a 3-state model of TMD activation, which provides a framework for understanding how inter-subunit rearrangements drive class C GPCR activation.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Vanessa A Gutzeit

    Neuroscience Graduate Program, Weill Cornell Graduate School of Medical Sciences, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Jordana Thibado

    Physiology, Biophysics and Systems Biology Graduate Program, Weill Cornell Graduate School of Medical Sciences, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Daniel Starer Stor

    Physiology, Biophysics and Systems Biology Graduate Program, Weill Cornell Graduate School of Medical Sciences, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Zhou Zhou

    Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Scott C Blanchard

    Physiology, Biophysics and Systems Biology Graduate Program, Weill Cornell Graduate School of Medical Sciences, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    Scott C Blanchard, SCB holds equity interest in Lumidyne Technologies.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2717-9365
  6. Olaf S Andersen

    Physiology, Biophysics and Systems Biology Graduate Program, Weill Cornell Graduate School of Medical Sciences, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Joshua Levitz

    Physiology, Biophysics and Systems Biology Graduate Program, Weill Cornell Graduate School of Medical Sciences, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    jtl2003@med.cornell.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8169-6323

Funding

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (1R35GM124731)

  • Joshua Levitz

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (1R01GM021342)

  • Olaf S Andersen

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM098858-07)

  • Scott C Blanchard

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2019, Gutzeit et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,164
    views
  • 650
    downloads
  • 40
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Vanessa A Gutzeit
  2. Jordana Thibado
  3. Daniel Starer Stor
  4. Zhou Zhou
  5. Scott C Blanchard
  6. Olaf S Andersen
  7. Joshua Levitz
(2019)
Conformational dynamics between transmembrane domains and allosteric modulation of a metabotropic glutamate receptor
eLife 8:e45116.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45116

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45116

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Anna Cattani, Don B Arnold ... Nancy Kopell
    Research Article

    The basolateral amygdala (BLA) is a key site where fear learning takes place through synaptic plasticity. Rodent research shows prominent low theta (~3–6 Hz), high theta (~6–12 Hz), and gamma (>30 Hz) rhythms in the BLA local field potential recordings. However, it is not understood what role these rhythms play in supporting the plasticity. Here, we create a biophysically detailed model of the BLA circuit to show that several classes of interneurons (PV, SOM, and VIP) in the BLA can be critically involved in producing the rhythms; these rhythms promote the formation of a dedicated fear circuit shaped through spike-timing-dependent plasticity. Each class of interneurons is necessary for the plasticity. We find that the low theta rhythm is a biomarker of successful fear conditioning. The model makes use of interneurons commonly found in the cortex and, hence, may apply to a wide variety of associative learning situations.

    1. Neuroscience
    Bharath Krishnan, Noah Cowan
    Insight

    Mice can generate a cognitive map of an environment based on self-motion signals when there is a fixed association between their starting point and the location of their goal.