DDR2 controls breast tumor stiffness and metastasis by regulating Integrin mediated mechanotransduction in CAFs

Abstract

Biomechanical changes in the tumor microenvironment influence tumor progression and metastases. Collagen content and fiber organization within the tumor stroma are major contributors to biomechanical changes (e., tumor stiffness) and correlated with tumor aggressiveness and outcome. What signals and in what cells control collagen organization within the tumors, and how, is not fully understood. We show in mouse breast tumors that the action of the collagen receptor DDR2 in CAFs controls tumor stiffness by reorganizing collagen fibers specifically at the tumor-stromal boundary. These changes were associated with lung metastases. The action of DDR2 in mouse and human CAFs, and tumors in vivo, was found to influence mechanotransduction by controlling full collagen-binding integrin activation via Rap1-mediated Talin1 and Kindlin2 recruitment. The action of DDR2 in tumor CAFs is thus critical for remodeling collagen fibers at the tumor-stromal boundary to generate a physically permissive tumor microenvironment for tumor cell invasion and metastases.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Samantha VH Bayer

    ICCE Institute, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Whitney R Grither

    ICCE Institute, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Audrey Brenot

    ICCE Institute, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Priscilla Y Hwang

    ICCE Institute, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Craig E Barcus

    ICCE Institute, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Melanie Ernst

    ICCE Institute, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8995-3507
  7. Patrick Pence

    ICCE Institute, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Christopher Walter

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Amit Pathak

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Gregory D Longmore

    ICCE Institute, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, United States
    For correspondence
    glongmore@wustl.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7568-8151

Funding

National Institute for Health Research (R01 CA196205)

  • Gregory D Longmore

National Institute for Health Research (R01 CA223758)

  • Gregory D Longmore

National Institute for Health Research (U54 CA210173)

  • Gregory D Longmore

American Cancer Society (131342-PF-17-238-01-CSM)

  • Priscilla Y Hwang

National Institute for Health Research (F30 CA200386)

  • Samantha VH Bayer

National Institute for Health Research (T32 GM07200)

  • Samantha VH Bayer
  • Whitney R Grither

National Institute for Health Research (T32 CA113275)

  • Craig E Barcus

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Joan Massagué, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health under protocol #20150145.

Version history

  1. Received: January 24, 2019
  2. Accepted: May 29, 2019
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: May 30, 2019 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: June 7, 2019 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2019, Bayer et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,038
    views
  • 655
    downloads
  • 69
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Samantha VH Bayer
  2. Whitney R Grither
  3. Audrey Brenot
  4. Priscilla Y Hwang
  5. Craig E Barcus
  6. Melanie Ernst
  7. Patrick Pence
  8. Christopher Walter
  9. Amit Pathak
  10. Gregory D Longmore
(2019)
DDR2 controls breast tumor stiffness and metastasis by regulating Integrin mediated mechanotransduction in CAFs
eLife 8:e45508.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45508

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45508

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Kevin Nuno, Armon Azizi ... Ravindra Majeti
    Research Article

    Relapse of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is highly aggressive and often treatment refractory. We analyzed previously published AML relapse cohorts and found that 40% of relapses occur without changes in driver mutations, suggesting that non-genetic mechanisms drive relapse in a large proportion of cases. We therefore characterized epigenetic patterns of AML relapse using 26 matched diagnosis-relapse samples with ATAC-seq. This analysis identified a relapse-specific chromatin accessibility signature for mutationally stable AML, suggesting that AML undergoes epigenetic evolution at relapse independent of mutational changes. Analysis of leukemia stem cell (LSC) chromatin changes at relapse indicated that this leukemic compartment underwent significantly less epigenetic evolution than non-LSCs, while epigenetic changes in non-LSCs reflected overall evolution of the bulk leukemia. Finally, we used single-cell ATAC-seq paired with mitochondrial sequencing (mtscATAC) to map clones from diagnosis into relapse along with their epigenetic features. We found that distinct mitochondrially-defined clones exhibit more similar chromatin accessibility at relapse relative to diagnosis, demonstrating convergent epigenetic evolution in relapsed AML. These results demonstrate that epigenetic evolution is a feature of relapsed AML and that convergent epigenetic evolution can occur following treatment with induction chemotherapy.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Ibtisam Ibtisam, Alexei F Kisselev
    Short Report

    Rapid recovery of proteasome activity may contribute to intrinsic and acquired resistance to FDA-approved proteasome inhibitors. Previous studies have demonstrated that the expression of proteasome genes in cells treated with sub-lethal concentrations of proteasome inhibitors is upregulated by the transcription factor Nrf1 (NFE2L1), which is activated by a DDI2 protease. Here, we demonstrate that the recovery of proteasome activity is DDI2-independent and occurs before transcription of proteasomal genes is upregulated but requires protein translation. Thus, mammalian cells possess an additional DDI2 and transcription-independent pathway for the rapid recovery of proteasome activity after proteasome inhibition.