Abstract

Metabolic cycles are a fundamental element of cellular and organismal function. Among the most critical in higher organisms is the Cori Cycle, the systemic cycling between lactate and glucose. Here, skeletal muscle-specific Mitochondrial Pyruvate Carrier (MPC) deletion in mice diverted pyruvate into circulating lactate. This switch disinhibited muscle fatty acid oxidation and drove Cori Cycling that contributed to increased energy expenditure. Loss of muscle MPC activity led to strikingly decreased adiposity with complete muscle mass and strength retention. Notably, despite decreasing muscle glucose oxidation, muscle MPC disruption increased muscle glucose uptake and whole-body insulin sensitivity. Furthermore, chronic and acute muscle MPC deletion accelerated fat mass loss on a normal diet after high fat diet-induced obesity. Our results illuminate the role of the skeletal muscle MPC as a whole-body carbon flux control point. They highlight the potential utility of decreasing muscle pyruvate utilization to ameliorate obesity and type 2 diabetes.

Data availability

All metabolomic results generated as part of this study are provided in Supplemental tables 2 and 3 related to Figure 5.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Arpit Sharma

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Lalita Oonthonpan

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Ryan D Sheldon

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Adam J Rauckhorst

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Zhiyong Zhu

    Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Sean C Tompkins

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Kevin Cho

    Department of Chemistry, Washington University in St Louis, St. Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Wojciech J Grzesik

    Fraternal Order of the Eagles Diabetes Research Center (FOEDRC), University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Lawrence R Gray

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Diego A Scerbo

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Alvin D Pewa

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Emily M Cushing

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9495-802X
  13. Michael C Dyle

    Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. James E Cox

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Chris Adams

    Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Brandon S Davies

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Richard K Shields

    Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Andrew W Norris

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Gary Patti

    FOEDRC Metabolomics Core Facility, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3748-6193
  20. Leonid V Zingman

    Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  21. Eric B Taylor

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
    For correspondence
    eric-taylor@uiowa.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4549-6567

Funding

National Institutes of Health (DK104998)

  • Eric B Taylor

National Institutes of Health (GM007337)

  • Sean C Tompkins

National Institutes of Health (HL007638)

  • Adam J Rauckhorst

National Institutes of Health (DK101183)

  • Lawrence R Gray

American Diabetes Association (1-18-PDF-060)

  • Adam J Rauckhorst

National Institutes of Health (DK112751)

  • Diego A Scerbo

National Institutes of Health (AR059190)

  • Eric B Taylor

National Institutes of Health (HD084645)

  • Richard K Shields

National Institutes of Health (HD082109)

  • Richard K Shields

National Institutes of Health (DK092412)

  • Leonid V Zingman

National Institutes of Health (ES028365)

  • Gary Patti

National Institutes of Health (HL130146)

  • Brandon S Davies

National Institutes of Health (HL007344)

  • Ryan D Sheldon

National Institutes of Health (DK116522)

  • Ryan D Sheldon

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. David E James, The University of Sydney, Australia

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Animal work was performed in accordance with the University of Iowa Animal Use and Care Committee (IACUC). The University of Iowa IACUC is accredited by AALACi (#000833), is a Registered United States Department of Agriculture research facility (USDA No. 42-R-0004), and has PHS Approved Animal Welfare Assurance (#D16-00009).

Version history

  1. Received: February 7, 2019
  2. Accepted: July 15, 2019
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: July 15, 2019 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: July 18, 2019 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record published: August 6, 2019 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2019, Sharma et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,685
    views
  • 875
    downloads
  • 55
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Arpit Sharma
  2. Lalita Oonthonpan
  3. Ryan D Sheldon
  4. Adam J Rauckhorst
  5. Zhiyong Zhu
  6. Sean C Tompkins
  7. Kevin Cho
  8. Wojciech J Grzesik
  9. Lawrence R Gray
  10. Diego A Scerbo
  11. Alvin D Pewa
  12. Emily M Cushing
  13. Michael C Dyle
  14. James E Cox
  15. Chris Adams
  16. Brandon S Davies
  17. Richard K Shields
  18. Andrew W Norris
  19. Gary Patti
  20. Leonid V Zingman
  21. Eric B Taylor
(2019)
Impaired skeletal muscle mitochondrial pyruvate uptake rewires glucose metabolism to drive whole-body leanness
eLife 8:e45873.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45873

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45873

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Ian Lorimer
    Insight

    Establishing a zebrafish model of a deadly type of brain tumor highlights the role of the immune system in the early stages of the disease.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Jaebin Kim, Edwin Bustamante ... Scott H Soderling
    Research Article

    One of the most extensively studied members of the Ras superfamily of small GTPases, Rac1 is an intracellular signal transducer that remodels actin and phosphorylation signaling networks. Previous studies have shown that Rac1-mediated signaling is associated with hippocampal-dependent working memory and longer-term forms of learning and memory and that Rac1 can modulate forms of both pre- and postsynaptic plasticity. How these different cognitive functions and forms of plasticity mediated by Rac1 are linked, however, is unclear. Here, we show that spatial working memory in mice is selectively impaired following the expression of a genetically encoded Rac1 inhibitor at presynaptic terminals, while longer-term cognitive processes are affected by Rac1 inhibition at postsynaptic sites. To investigate the regulatory mechanisms of this presynaptic process, we leveraged new advances in mass spectrometry to identify the proteomic and post-translational landscape of presynaptic Rac1 signaling. We identified serine/threonine kinases and phosphorylated cytoskeletal signaling and synaptic vesicle proteins enriched with active Rac1. The phosphorylated sites in these proteins are at positions likely to have regulatory effects on synaptic vesicles. Consistent with this, we also report changes in the distribution and morphology of synaptic vesicles and in postsynaptic ultrastructure following presynaptic Rac1 inhibition. Overall, this study reveals a previously unrecognized presynaptic role of Rac1 signaling in cognitive processes and provides insights into its potential regulatory mechanisms.