Hippocampus: Getting the full picture

A combination of old and new techniques have been used to reveal new details about the behavior of individual neurons across the sleep-wake-cycle.
  1. Alessandro Luchetti
  2. Ananya Chowdhury
  3. Alcino J Silva  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of California Los Angeles, United States

Electrodes have been used to excite and record electrical signals in the nervous system for decades. More recently other techniques, notably calcium imaging and optogenetics, have allowed neuroscientists to study a much wider range of phenomena in 'behaving' animals (i.e., animals that have not been anesthetized and are free to perform various tasks; Ziv et al., 2013; Kim et al., 2017; Stamatakis et al., 2018). Now, in eLife, Stephen Gomperts and colleagues at Massachusetts General Hospital – including Heng Zhou as first author – report how they have used a combination of electrode recordings and calcium imaging to study hippocampal neurons in mice engaged in learning and memory tasks (Zhou et al., 2019).

The hippocampus has a critical role in learning and memory. It is thought that signals sent along cholinergic neurons from other regions of the brain to the hippocampus place it in an 'information acquisition state' that is associated with the animal actively exploring its environment. These signals also modulate neuronal activity, including electrical excitations called theta oscillations, and the encoding of memory in the hippocampus (Hasselmo, 2006; Teles-Grilo Ruivo and Mellor, 2013). During theta oscillations, increases in the concentration of calcium ions can lead to changes in the strength of the synapses between neurons: this 'synaptic plasticity' is needed for the acquisition and storage of information in the hippocampus (Buzsáki, 2002). Later, a different hippocampal state, characterized by sharp waves and ripples (SWRs), is thought to replay and broadcast the information acquired to more permanent storage sites in the neocortex (Buzsáki, 2015). Unlike theta oscillations, which are generally smooth low-frequency waves, SWRs are more jagged and have higher frequencies; both single SWRs and trains of SWRs can be observed in the hippocampus.

To further study the cellular and circuit mechanisms engaged in these different functional states of the hippocampus, Zhou et al. used both electrode recordings and calcium imaging during the sleep-wake-cycle. As expected, the level of calcium activity in the hippocampus was highest during theta oscillations and lowest during sharp waves and ripples. Furthermore, although the timing of the calcium activity did synchronize with the ripples in SWRs, as previously thought (Malvache et al., 2016), the level of calcium activity only increased during trains of SWRs (and actually dropped during single SWRs). These are interesting results that will continue to fuel efforts to model the neural circuits in the hippocampus.

Zhou et al. also explored how calcium activity varied during the sleep cycle, and found that it was higher during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep than during slow wave sleep. Sleep is thought to have an important role in memory consolidation, with recently encoded memories being reactivated during slow wave sleep, and then consolidated during REM sleep (Sara, 2017). The latest findings suggest that different levels of calcium activity during the different phases of sleep could be key for memory consolidation.

Zhou et al. also studied how calcium activity was affected by theta oscillations and by signals sent along cholinergic neurons from the medial septum to the hippocampus. The cholinergic neurons were activated by expressing a chemogenetic receptor in the medial septum (Roth, 2016). This allowed the researchers to specifically activate the cholinergic neurons in the medial septum by administering the chemogenetic ligand to the animals. Activation of these neurons increased calcium activity in the hippocampus, but reduced sharp waves and ripples during periods of low mobility and sleep. Furthermore, using a drug to inhibit a subset of the receptors for cholinergic neurons reduced calcium activity while increasing sharp waves and ripples. The ability to record these two distinct signals, calcium activity and electrical oscillations and waves, revealed that calcium activity in the hippocampus depends on behavioral states, electrical activity, and cholinergic activation.

The work of Zhou et al. is representative of a novel wave of studies in systems neuroscience that is moving the field from its roots in electrophysiology to studies that involve recording and manipulating a wider range of biological phenomena. The present revolution in the field started more than 10 years ago with optogenetic tools capable of turning neurons on and off, and with neuronal imaging of 'head-fixed' animals (Kim et al., 2017; Stamatakis et al., 2018). It is now possible, as Zhou et al. have shown, to use head-mounted fluorescent mini-scopes to record cellular and circuit events in freely moving mice.

Moreover, in addition to allowing the activation and inactivation of specific neurons and neural circuits, a new generation of optogenetic and chemogenetic tools make it possible to manipulate specific molecular events in specific cells (not just neurons) in these circuits. These new tools are providing researchers with unprecedented access to functional states in circuits that had previously gone unrecognized. Zhou et al. have taken advantage of these advances to uncover a wealth of previously unknown interactions between phenomena traditionally probed in hippocampal research (i.e., electrophysiological states and cholinergic function) and phenomena revealed by the new techniques (i.e., calcium events) during a wide range of functional states, including quiet wakefulness, running, slow wave sleep and REM sleep. We can only wonder what we will continue to uncover as new tools allow us to dig deeper and see further into the functional complexity of brain circuits.

References

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Alessandro Luchetti

    Alessandro Luchetti is in the Departments of Neurobiology, Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, and Psychology, the Integrative Center for Learning and Memory, and the Brain Research Institute, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States

    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5810-9303
  2. Ananya Chowdhury

    Ananya Chowdhury is in the Departments of Neurobiology, Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, and Psychology, the Integrative Center for Learning and Memory, and the Brain Research Institute, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States

    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2906-4257
  3. Alcino J Silva

    Alcino J Silva is in the Departments of Neurobiology, Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, and Psychology, the Integrative Center for Learning and Memory, and the Brain Research Institute, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States

    For correspondence
    silvaa@mednet.ucla.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1587-4558

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published:

Copyright

© 2019, Luchetti et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,829
    views
  • 0
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Alessandro Luchetti
  2. Ananya Chowdhury
  3. Alcino J Silva
(2019)
Hippocampus: Getting the full picture
eLife 8:e46279.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.46279
  1. Further reading

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Claire Meissner-Bernard, Friedemann Zenke, Rainer W Friedrich
    Research Article

    Biological memory networks are thought to store information by experience-dependent changes in the synaptic connectivity between assemblies of neurons. Recent models suggest that these assemblies contain both excitatory and inhibitory neurons (E/I assemblies), resulting in co-tuning and precise balance of excitation and inhibition. To understand computational consequences of E/I assemblies under biologically realistic constraints we built a spiking network model based on experimental data from telencephalic area Dp of adult zebrafish, a precisely balanced recurrent network homologous to piriform cortex. We found that E/I assemblies stabilized firing rate distributions compared to networks with excitatory assemblies and global inhibition. Unlike classical memory models, networks with E/I assemblies did not show discrete attractor dynamics. Rather, responses to learned inputs were locally constrained onto manifolds that ‘focused’ activity into neuronal subspaces. The covariance structure of these manifolds supported pattern classification when information was retrieved from selected neuronal subsets. Networks with E/I assemblies therefore transformed the geometry of neuronal coding space, resulting in continuous representations that reflected both relatedness of inputs and an individual’s experience. Such continuous representations enable fast pattern classification, can support continual learning, and may provide a basis for higher-order learning and cognitive computations.

    1. Neuroscience
    Cristina Gil Avila, Elisabeth S May ... Markus Ploner
    Research Article

    Chronic pain is a prevalent and debilitating condition whose neural mechanisms are incompletely understood. An imbalance of cerebral excitation and inhibition (E/I), particularly in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), is believed to represent a crucial mechanism in the development and maintenance of chronic pain. Thus, identifying a non-invasive, scalable marker of E/I could provide valuable insights into the neural mechanisms of chronic pain and aid in developing clinically useful biomarkers. Recently, the aperiodic component of the electroencephalography (EEG) power spectrum has been proposed to represent a non-invasive proxy for E/I. We, therefore, assessed the aperiodic component in the mPFC of resting-state EEG recordings in 149 people with chronic pain and 115 healthy participants. We found robust evidence against differences in the aperiodic component in the mPFC between people with chronic pain and healthy participants, and no correlation between the aperiodic component and pain intensity. These findings were consistent across different subtypes of chronic pain and were similarly found in a whole-brain analysis. Their robustness was supported by preregistration and multiverse analyses across many different methodological choices. Together, our results suggest that the EEG aperiodic component does not differentiate between people with chronic pain and healthy individuals. These findings and the rigorous methodological approach can guide future studies investigating non-invasive, scalable markers of cerebral dysfunction in people with chronic pain and beyond.