Re-expression of SynGAP protein in adulthood improves translatable measures of brain function and behavior

  1. Thomas K Creson
  2. Camilo Rojas
  3. Ernie Hwaun
  4. Thomas Vaissiere
  5. Murat Kilinc
  6. Andres Jimenez-Gomez
  7. J Lloyd Holder
  8. Jianrong Tang
  9. Laura L Colgin
  10. Courtney A Miller
  11. Gavin Rumbaugh  Is a corresponding author
  1. The Scripps Research Institute, United States
  2. University of Texas at Austin, United States
  3. Baylor College of Medicine, United States

Abstract

It remains unclear to what extent neurodevelopmental disorder (NDD) risk genes retain functions into adulthood and how they may influence disease phenotypes. SYNGAP1 haploinsufficiency causes a severe NDD defined by autistic traits, cognitive impairment, and epilepsy. To determine if this gene retains therapeutically-relevant biological functions into adulthood, we performed a gene restoration technique in a mouse model for SYNGAP1 haploinsufficiency. Adult restoration of SynGAP protein improved behavioral and electrophysiological measures of memory and seizure. This included the elimination of interictal events that worsened during sleep. These events may be a biomarker for generalized cortical dysfunction in SYNGAP1 disorders because they also worsened during sleep in the human patient population. We conclude that SynGAP protein retains biological functions throughout adulthood and that non-developmental functions may contribute to disease phenotypes. Thus, treatments that target debilitating aspects of severe NDDs, such as medically-refractory seizures and cognitive impairment, may be effective in adult patients.

Data availability

Data used for generating figures are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Thomas K Creson

    Department of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Camilo Rojas

    Department of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Ernie Hwaun

    Institute for Neuroscience, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Thomas Vaissiere

    Department of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Murat Kilinc

    Department of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Andres Jimenez-Gomez

    Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. J Lloyd Holder

    Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Jianrong Tang

    Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Laura L Colgin

    Center for Learning and Memory, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States
    Competing interests
    Laura L Colgin, Reviewing editor, eLife.
  10. Courtney A Miller

    Department of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Gavin Rumbaugh

    Department of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, United States
    For correspondence
    grumbaug@scripps.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6360-3894

Funding

National Institute of Mental Health (MH108408)

  • Gavin Rumbaugh

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Animal experiments were conducted according to protocols submitted to, and approved by, Scripps Research (Protocol #15-037 and #15-038) and the Baylor College of Medicine (Protocol #AN5585) Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees.

Human subjects: The SYNGAP1 Patient Registry [42] (https://syngap1registry.iamrare.org) is funded through the National Organization of Rare Disorders. Collection of human subject data was reviewed and approved by Hummingbird (Study # 2016-57-SYNGAP) and Baylor College of Medicine (Study #H-30480 and #H-41411) Institutional Review Boards.The parents of patients S3-060 and S3-080, which are distinct patients from those represented in Supplemental Table 4, provided written informed consent according to a protocol approved by the Baylor College of Medicine Institutional Review Board.

Copyright

© 2019, Creson et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 6,727
    views
  • 717
    downloads
  • 69
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Thomas K Creson
  2. Camilo Rojas
  3. Ernie Hwaun
  4. Thomas Vaissiere
  5. Murat Kilinc
  6. Andres Jimenez-Gomez
  7. J Lloyd Holder
  8. Jianrong Tang
  9. Laura L Colgin
  10. Courtney A Miller
  11. Gavin Rumbaugh
(2019)
Re-expression of SynGAP protein in adulthood improves translatable measures of brain function and behavior
eLife 8:e46752.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.46752

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.46752

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Vincent Huson, Wade G Regehr
    Research Article

    Unipolar brush cells (UBCs) are excitatory interneurons in the cerebellar cortex that receive mossy fiber (MF) inputs and excite granule cells. The UBC population responds to brief burst activation of MFs with a continuum of temporal transformations, but it is not known how UBCs transform the diverse range of MF input patterns that occur in vivo. Here, we use cell-attached recordings from UBCs in acute cerebellar slices to examine responses to MF firing patterns that are based on in vivo recordings. We find that MFs evoke a continuum of responses in the UBC population, mediated by three different types of glutamate receptors that each convey a specialized component. AMPARs transmit timing information for single stimuli at up to 5 spikes/s, and for very brief bursts. A combination of mGluR2/3s (inhibitory) and mGluR1s (excitatory) mediates a continuum of delayed, and broadened responses to longer bursts, and to sustained high frequency activation. Variability in the mGluR2/3 component controls the time course of the onset of firing, and variability in the mGluR1 component controls the duration of prolonged firing. We conclude that the combination of glutamate receptor types allows each UBC to simultaneously convey different aspects of MF firing. These findings establish that UBCs are highly flexible circuit elements that provide diverse temporal transformations that are well suited to contribute to specialized processing in different regions of the cerebellar cortex.

    1. Neuroscience
    Nico A Flierman, Sue Ann Koay ... Chris I De Zeeuw
    Research Article

    The role of cerebellum in controlling eye movements is well established, but its contribution to more complex forms of visual behavior has remained elusive. To study cerebellar activity during visual attention we recorded extracellular activity of dentate nucleus (DN) neurons in two non-human primates (NHPs). NHPs were trained to read the direction indicated by a peripheral visual stimulus while maintaining fixation at the center, and report the direction of the cue by performing a saccadic eye movement into the same direction following a delay. We found that single-unit DN neurons modulated spiking activity over the entire time course of the task, and that their activity often bridged temporally separated intra-trial events, yet in a heterogeneous manner. To better understand the heterogeneous relationship between task structure, behavioral performance, and neural dynamics, we constructed a behavioral, an encoding, and a decoding model. Both NHPs showed different behavioral strategies, which influenced the performance. Activity of the DN neurons reflected the unique strategies, with the direction of the visual stimulus frequently being encoded long before an upcoming saccade. Moreover, the latency of the ramping activity of DN neurons following presentation of the visual stimulus was shorter in the better performing NHP. Labeling with the retrograde tracer Cholera Toxin B in the recording location in the DN indicated that these neurons predominantly receive inputs from Purkinje cells in the D1 and D2 zones of the lateral cerebellum as well as neurons of the principal olive and medial pons, all regions known to connect with neurons in the prefrontal cortex contributing to planning of saccades. Together, our results highlight that DN neurons can dynamically modulate their activity during a visual attention task, comprising not only sensorimotor but also cognitive attentional components.