GPIHBP1 expression in gliomas promotes utilization of lipoprotein-derived nutrients

Abstract

GPIHBP1, a GPI-anchored protein of capillary endothelial cells, binds lipoprotein lipase (LPL) within the subendothelial spaces and shuttles it to the capillary lumen. The GPIHBP1-bound LPL is essential for the margination of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRLs) along capillaries, allowing the lipolytic processing of TRLs to proceed. In peripheral tissues, the intravascular processing of TRLs by the GPIHBP1–LPL complex is crucial for generating lipid nutrients for adjacent parenchymal cells. GPIHBP1 is absent in capillaries of the brain, which uses glucose for fuel; however, GPIHBP1 is expressed in capillaries of mouse and human gliomas. Importantly, the GPIHBP1 in glioma capillaries captures locally produced LPL. We document, by NanoSIMS imaging, that TRLs marginate along glioma capillaries and that there is uptake of TRL-derived lipid nutrients by surrounding glioma cells. Thus, GPIHBP1 expression in gliomas facilitates TRL processing and provides a source of lipid nutrients for glioma cells.

Data availability

All data generated during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Xuchen Hu

    Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Ken Matsumoto

    Vascular Patterning Lab, VIB-KU Leuven Center for Cancer Biology (CCB), Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Rachel S Jung

    Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Thomas A Weston

    Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Patrick J Heizer

    Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Cuiwen He

    Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Norma P Sandoval

    Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Christopher M Allan

    Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Yiping Tu

    Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Harry V Vinters

    Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Linda M Liau

    Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Rochelle M Ellison

    Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Jazmin E Morales

    Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Lynn J Baufeld

    Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Nicholas A Bayley

    Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. Liqun He

    Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  17. Christer Betsholtz

    Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  18. Anne P Beigneux

    Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  19. David A Nathanson

    Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  20. Holger Gerhardt

    Integrative Vascular Biology, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    Holger Gerhardt, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3030-0384
  21. Stephen G Young

    Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    For correspondence
    sgyoung@mednet.ucla.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7270-3176
  22. Loren G Fong

    Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    For correspondence
    lfong@mednet.ucla.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4465-5290
  23. Haibo Jiang

    Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    For correspondence
    haibo.jiang@uwa.edu.au
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

Funding

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL090553)

  • Stephen G Young

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL087228)

  • Stephen G Young

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL125335)

  • Stephen G Young

Foundation Leduq (12CVD04)

  • Stephen G Young

Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award (T32HL69766)

  • Xuchen Hu

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM008042)

  • Xuchen Hu

NCI Brain Tumor SPORE (P50-CA211015)

  • Linda M Liau

Stichting Tegen Kanker (2012‐181)

  • Holger Gerhardt

Stichting Tegen Kanker (2018-074)

  • Holger Gerhardt

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Animal housing and experimental protocols were approved by UCLA's Animal Research Committee (ARC; 2004-125-51, 2016-005) and the Institutional Animal Care and Research Advisory Committee of the KU Leuven (085/2016). The animals were housed in an AAALAC (Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International)-approved facility and cared for according to guidelines established by UCLA's Animal Research Committee.

Human subjects: All tissue samples from patients were obtained after informed consent and with approval from the UCLA Institutional Review Board (IRB; protocol 10-000655).

Copyright

© 2019, Hu et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,622
    views
  • 254
    downloads
  • 9
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Xuchen Hu
  2. Ken Matsumoto
  3. Rachel S Jung
  4. Thomas A Weston
  5. Patrick J Heizer
  6. Cuiwen He
  7. Norma P Sandoval
  8. Christopher M Allan
  9. Yiping Tu
  10. Harry V Vinters
  11. Linda M Liau
  12. Rochelle M Ellison
  13. Jazmin E Morales
  14. Lynn J Baufeld
  15. Nicholas A Bayley
  16. Liqun He
  17. Christer Betsholtz
  18. Anne P Beigneux
  19. David A Nathanson
  20. Holger Gerhardt
  21. Stephen G Young
  22. Loren G Fong
  23. Haibo Jiang
(2019)
GPIHBP1 expression in gliomas promotes utilization of lipoprotein-derived nutrients
eLife 8:e47178.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.47178

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.47178

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Jie Luo, Jeff Ranish
    Tools and Resources

    Dynamic conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes play a central and ubiquitous role in the regulation of protein function, yet it is very challenging to study these changes, especially for large protein complexes, under physiological conditions. Here, we introduce a novel isobaric crosslinker, Qlinker, for studying conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes using quantitative crosslinking mass spectrometry. Qlinkers are small and simple, amine-reactive molecules with an optimal extended distance of ~10 Å, which use MS2 reporter ions for relative quantification of Qlinker-modified peptides derived from different samples. We synthesized the 2-plex Q2linker and showed that the Q2linker can provide quantitative crosslinking data that pinpoints key conformational and structural changes in biosensors, binary and ternary complexes composed of the general transcription factors TBP, TFIIA, and TFIIB, and RNA polymerase II complexes.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Alejandro J Brenes, Eva Griesser ... Angus I Lamond
    Research Article

    Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) have great potential to be used as alternatives to embryonic stem cells (hESCs) in regenerative medicine and disease modelling. In this study, we characterise the proteomes of multiple hiPSC and hESC lines derived from independent donors and find that while they express a near-identical set of proteins, they show consistent quantitative differences in the abundance of a subset of proteins. hiPSCs have increased total protein content, while maintaining a comparable cell cycle profile to hESCs, with increased abundance of cytoplasmic and mitochondrial proteins required to sustain high growth rates, including nutrient transporters and metabolic proteins. Prominent changes detected in proteins involved in mitochondrial metabolism correlated with enhanced mitochondrial potential, shown using high-resolution respirometry. hiPSCs also produced higher levels of secreted proteins, including growth factors and proteins involved in the inhibition of the immune system. The data indicate that reprogramming of fibroblasts to hiPSCs produces important differences in cytoplasmic and mitochondrial proteins compared to hESCs, with consequences affecting growth and metabolism. This study improves our understanding of the molecular differences between hiPSCs and hESCs, with implications for potential risks and benefits for their use in future disease modelling and therapeutic applications.