Abstract

Androgen receptor (AR) inhibitors represent the mainstay of prostate cancer treatment. In a genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 screen using LNCaP prostate cancer cells, loss of co-repressor TLE3 conferred resistance to AR antagonists apalutamide and enzalutamide. Genes differentially expressed upon TLE3 loss share AR as the top transcriptional regulator, and TLE3 loss rescued the expression of a subset of androgen-responsive genes upon enzalutamide treatment. GR expression was strongly upregulated upon AR inhibition in a TLE3-negative background. This was consistent with binding of TLE3 and AR at the GR locus. Furthermore, GR binding was observed proximal to TLE3/AR-shared genes. GR inhibition resensitized TLE3KO cells to enzalutamide. Analyses of patient samples revealed an association between TLE3 and GR levels that reflected our findings in LNCaP cells, of which the clinical relevance is yet to be determined. Together, our findings reveal a mechanistic link between TLE3 and GR-mediated resistance to AR inhibitors in human prostate cancer.

Data availability

Data for Figure 1 (CRISPR resistance screen) is provided (source data file for Figure 1).Data for Figure 2 (RNA-seq) have been deposited in GEO under accession code GSE130246.Data (ChIP-seq) for Figure 3 and 4 is publicly available (GSE94682).Data for Figure 5C is the TCGA dataset (publicly available).

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sander AL Palit

    Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    For correspondence
    s.palit@nki.nl
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2487-4311
  2. Daniel Vis

    Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Suzan Stelloo

    Division of Oncogenomics, Oncode Institute, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Cor Lieftink

    Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Stefan Prekovic

    Division of Oncogenomics, Oncode Institute, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Elise Bekers

    Division of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Ingrid Hofland

    Core Facility Molecular Pathology and Biobanking, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Tonći Šuštić

    Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Liesanne Wolters

    Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Roderick Beijersbergen

    Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Andries M Bergman

    Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Balázs Győrffy

    TTK Cancer Biomarker Research Group, Institute of Enzymology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Lodewyk FA Wessels

    Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Wilbert Zwart

    Division of Oncogenomics, Oncode Institute, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    Wilbert Zwart, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9823-7289
  15. Michiel S van der Heijden

    Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    For correspondence
    ms.vd.heijden@nki.nl
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

Funding

KWF Kankerbestrijding (NKI2014-7080)

  • Michiel S van der Heijden

KWF Kankerbestrijding (NKI2014-7080)

  • Andries M Bergman

KWF Kankerbestrijding (NKI2014-7080)

  • Wilbert Zwart

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Myles Brown, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, United States

Version history

  1. Received: April 4, 2019
  2. Accepted: December 19, 2019
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: December 19, 2019 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: January 17, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2019, Palit et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,363
    views
  • 410
    downloads
  • 24
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Sander AL Palit
  2. Daniel Vis
  3. Suzan Stelloo
  4. Cor Lieftink
  5. Stefan Prekovic
  6. Elise Bekers
  7. Ingrid Hofland
  8. Tonći Šuštić
  9. Liesanne Wolters
  10. Roderick Beijersbergen
  11. Andries M Bergman
  12. Balázs Győrffy
  13. Lodewyk FA Wessels
  14. Wilbert Zwart
  15. Michiel S van der Heijden
(2019)
TLE3 loss confers AR inhibitor resistance by facilitating GR-mediated human prostate cancer cell growth
eLife 8:e47430.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.47430

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.47430

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Ian Lorimer
    Insight

    Establishing a zebrafish model of a deadly type of brain tumor highlights the role of the immune system in the early stages of the disease.

    1. Cancer Biology
    Xia Shen, Xiang Peng ... Chen-Ying Liu
    Research Article

    The role of processing bodies (P-bodies) in tumorigenesis and tumor progression is not well understood. Here, we showed that the oncogenes YAP/TAZ promote P-body formation in a series of cancer cell lines. Mechanistically, both transcriptional activation of the P-body-related genes SAMD4A, AJUBA, and WTIP and transcriptional suppression of the tumor suppressor gene PNRC1 are involved in enhancing the effects of YAP/TAZ on P-body formation in colorectal cancer (CRC) cells. By reexpression of PNRC1 or knockdown of P-body core genes (DDX6, DCP1A, and LSM14A), we determined that disruption of P-bodies attenuates cell proliferation, cell migration, and tumor growth induced by overexpression of YAP5SA in CRC. Analysis of a pancancer CRISPR screen database (DepMap) revealed co-dependencies between YAP/TEAD and the P-body core genes and correlations between the mRNA levels of SAMD4A, AJUBA, WTIP, PNRC1, and YAP target genes. Our study suggests that the P-body is a new downstream effector of YAP/TAZ, which implies that reexpression of PNRC1 or disruption of P-bodies is a potential therapeutic strategy for tumors with active YAP.