Spatiotemporal control of mitotic exit during anaphase by an Aurora B-Cdk1 crosstalk

  1. Olga Afonso
  2. Colleen M Castellani
  3. Liam P Cheeseman
  4. Jorge G Ferreira
  5. Bernardo Orr
  6. Luisa T Ferreira
  7. James J Chambers
  8. Eurico Morais-de-Sá
  9. Thomas J Maresca
  10. Helder Maiato  Is a corresponding author
  1. i3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Portugal
  2. University of Massachusetts, United States

Abstract

According to the prevailing 'clock' model, chromosome decondensation and nuclear envelope reformation when cells exit mitosis are byproducts of Cdk1 inactivation at the metaphase-anaphase transition, controlled by the spindle assembly checkpoint. However, mitotic exit was recently shown to be a function of chromosome separation during anaphase, assisted by a midzone Aurora B phosphorylation gradient - the 'ruler' model. Here we found that Cdk1 remains active during anaphase due to ongoing APC/CCdc20- and APC/CCdh1-mediated degradation of B-type Cyclins in Drosophila and human cells. Failure to degrade B-type Cyclins during anaphase prevented mitotic exit in a Cdk1-dependent manner. Cyclin B1-Cdk1 localized at the spindle midzone in an Aurora B-dependent manner, with incompletely separated chromosomes showing the highest Cdk1 activity. Slowing down anaphase chromosome motion delayed Cyclin B1 degradation and mitotic exit in an Aurora B-dependent manner. Thus, a crosstalk between molecular 'rulers' and 'clocks' licenses mitotic exit only after proper chromosome separation.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Olga Afonso

    Chromosome Instability and Dynamics Laboratory, Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, i3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Colleen M Castellani

    Biology Department, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Liam P Cheeseman

    Chromosome Instability and Dynamics Laboratory, Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, i3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Jorge G Ferreira

    Chromosome Instability and Dynamics Laboratory, Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, i3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Bernardo Orr

    Chromosome Instability and Dynamics Laboratory, Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, i3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Luisa T Ferreira

    Chromosome Instability and Dynamics Laboratory, Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, i3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. James J Chambers

    Institute for Applied Life Sciences,, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Eurico Morais-de-Sá

    Chromosome Instability and Dynamics Laboratory, Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, i3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Thomas J Maresca

    Biology Department, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2214-8674
  10. Helder Maiato

    Chromosome Instability and Dynamics Laboratory, Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, i3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
    For correspondence
    maiato@i3s.up.pt
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6200-9997

Funding

European Reseach Council (681443)

  • Helder Maiato

Fundação Luso-Americana (FLAD LifeScience2020)

  • Helder Maiato

Marie Skłodowska-Curie Action (746515)

  • Liam P Cheeseman

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (PTDC/BEX-BCM/0432/2014)

  • Eurico Morais-de-Sá

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All mice were maintained in a specific pathogen-free environment according to the Portuguese animal welfare authority regulations (Direcção Geral de Alimentação e Veterinária; reference# 0421/000/000/2016) and the guidelines of the Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde animal facility.

Copyright

© 2019, Afonso et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,246
    views
  • 680
    downloads
  • 39
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Olga Afonso
  2. Colleen M Castellani
  3. Liam P Cheeseman
  4. Jorge G Ferreira
  5. Bernardo Orr
  6. Luisa T Ferreira
  7. James J Chambers
  8. Eurico Morais-de-Sá
  9. Thomas J Maresca
  10. Helder Maiato
(2019)
Spatiotemporal control of mitotic exit during anaphase by an Aurora B-Cdk1 crosstalk
eLife 8:e47646.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.47646

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.47646

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Affiong Ika Oqua, Kin Chao ... Alejandra Tomas
    Research Article

    G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are integral membrane proteins which closely interact with their plasma membrane lipid microenvironment. Cholesterol is a lipid enriched at the plasma membrane with pivotal roles in the control of membrane fluidity and maintenance of membrane microarchitecture, directly impacting on GPCR stability, dynamics, and function. Cholesterol extraction from pancreatic beta cells has previously been shown to disrupt the internalisation, clustering, and cAMP responses of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R), a class B1 GPCR with key roles in the control of blood glucose levels via the potentiation of insulin secretion in beta cells and weight reduction via the modulation of brain appetite control centres. Here, we unveil the detrimental effect of a high cholesterol diet on GLP-1R-dependent glucoregulation in vivo, and the improvement in GLP-1R function that a reduction in cholesterol synthesis using simvastatin exerts in pancreatic islets. We next identify and map sites of cholesterol high occupancy and residence time on active vs inactive GLP-1Rs using coarse-grained molecular dynamics (cgMD) simulations, followed by a screen of key residues selected from these sites and detailed analyses of the effects of mutating one of these, Val229, to alanine on GLP-1R-cholesterol interactions, plasma membrane behaviours, clustering, trafficking and signalling in INS-1 832/3 rat pancreatic beta cells and primary mouse islets, unveiling an improved insulin secretion profile for the V229A mutant receptor. This study (1) highlights the role of cholesterol in regulating GLP-1R responses in vivo; (2) provides a detailed map of GLP-1R - cholesterol binding sites in model membranes; (3) validates their functional relevance in beta cells; and (4) highlights their potential as locations for the rational design of novel allosteric modulators with the capacity to fine-tune GLP-1R responses.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Alejandro Rosell, Agata Adelajda Krygowska ... Esther Castellano Sanchez
    Research Article

    Macrophages are crucial in the body’s inflammatory response, with tightly regulated functions for optimal immune system performance. Our study reveals that the RAS–p110α signalling pathway, known for its involvement in various biological processes and tumourigenesis, regulates two vital aspects of the inflammatory response in macrophages: the initial monocyte movement and later-stage lysosomal function. Disrupting this pathway, either in a mouse model or through drug intervention, hampers the inflammatory response, leading to delayed resolution and the development of more severe acute inflammatory reactions in live models. This discovery uncovers a previously unknown role of the p110α isoform in immune regulation within macrophages, offering insight into the complex mechanisms governing their function during inflammation and opening new avenues for modulating inflammatory responses.