1. Cell Biology
Download icon

Site-specific phosphorylation and caspase cleavage of GFAP are new markers of Alexander Disease severity

  1. Rachel A Battaglia
  2. Adriana S Beltran
  3. Samed Delic
  4. Raluca Dumitru
  5. Jasmine A Robinson
  6. Parijat Kabiraj
  7. Laura E Herring
  8. Victoria J Madden
  9. Namritha Ravinder
  10. Erik Willems
  11. Rhonda A Newman
  12. Roy Andrew Quinlan
  13. James E Goldman
  14. Ming-Der Perng
  15. Masaki Inagaki
  16. Natasha T Snider  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States
  2. Thermo Fisher Scientific, United States
  3. Durham University, United Kingdom
  4. Columbia University, United States
  5. National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan, Republic of China
  6. Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
Research Article
  • Cited 4
  • Views 1,904
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2019;8:e47789 doi: 10.7554/eLife.47789

Abstract

Alexander Disease (AxD) is a fatal neurodegenerative disorder caused by mutations in glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), which supports the structural integrity of astrocytes. Over 70 GFAP missense mutations cause AxD, but the mechanism linking different mutations to disease-relevant phenotypes remains unknown. We used AxD patient brain tissue and induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived astrocytes to investigate the hypothesis that AxD-causing mutations perturb key post-translational modifications (PTMs) on GFAP. Our findings reveal selective phosphorylation of GFAP-Ser13 in patients who died young, independently of the mutation they carried. AxD iPSC-astrocytes accumulated pSer13-GFAP in cytoplasmic aggregates within deep nuclear invaginations, resembling the hallmark Rosenthal fibers observed in vivo. Ser13 phosphorylation facilitated GFAP aggregation and was associated with increased GFAP proteolysis by caspase-6. Furthermore, caspase-6 was selectively expressed in young AxD patients, and correlated with the presence of cleaved GFAP. We reveal a novel PTM signature linking different GFAP mutations in infantile AxD.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Rachel A Battaglia

    Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  2. Adriana S Beltran

    Department of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  3. Samed Delic

    Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  4. Raluca Dumitru

    Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Core Facility, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  5. Jasmine A Robinson

    Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  6. Parijat Kabiraj

    Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  7. Laura E Herring

    Department of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  8. Victoria J Madden

    Department of Pathology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7909-7743

  9. Namritha Ravinder

    Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, United States
    Competing interests
    Namritha Ravinder, is a paid employee of ThermoFisher Scientific, whose products were used to complete parts of the study.

  10. Erik Willems

    Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, United States
    Competing interests
    Erik Willems, is a paid employee of ThermoFisher Scientific, whose products were used to complete parts of the study.

  11. Rhonda A Newman

    Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, United States
    Competing interests
    Rhonda A Newman, is a paid employee of ThermoFisher Scientific, whose products were used to complete parts of the study. ThermoFisher Scientific had no role in the study design, data analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

  12. Roy Andrew Quinlan

    Department of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0644-4123

  13. James E Goldman

    Department of Pathology, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  14. Ming-Der Perng

    Institute of Molecular Medicine, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, Republic of China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  15. Masaki Inagaki

    Department of Physiology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie, Japan
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  16. Natasha T Snider

    Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    For correspondence
    ntsnider@med.unc.edu
    Competing interests
    Natasha T Snider, is a member of the Scientific Advisory Board for Elise's Corner Fund, which supported part of this work.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7663-4585

Funding

Elise's Corner Fund (Research Grant)

  • Natasha T Snider

United Leukodystrophy Foundation (Research Grant)

  • Natasha T Snider

National Science Foundation (Graduate Research Fellowship)

  • Rachel A Battaglia

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (Department of Cell Biology and Physiology)

  • Natasha T Snider

National Institutes of Health (P30 CA016086)

  • Victoria J Madden

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Kang Shen, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, United States

Publication history

  1. Received: April 18, 2019
  2. Accepted: November 4, 2019
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: November 4, 2019 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: December 23, 2019 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2019, Battaglia et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,904
    Page views
  • 283
    Downloads
  • 4
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Categories and tags

Research organism

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics

    Structural basis of Stu2 recruitment to yeast kinetochores

    Jacob A Zahm et al.
    Research Article Updated

    Chromosome segregation during cell division requires engagement of kinetochores of sister chromatids with microtubules emanating from opposite poles. As the corresponding microtubules shorten, these ‘bioriented’ sister kinetochores experience tension-dependent stabilization of microtubule attachments. The yeast XMAP215 family member and microtubule polymerase, Stu2, associates with kinetochores and contributes to tension-dependent stabilization in vitro. We show here that a C-terminal segment of Stu2 binds the four-way junction of the Ndc80 complex (Ndc80c) and that residues conserved both in yeast Stu2 orthologs and in their metazoan counterparts make specific contacts with Ndc80 and Spc24. Mutations that perturb this interaction prevent association of Stu2 with kinetochores, impair cell viability, produce biorientation defects, and delay cell cycle progression. Ectopic tethering of the mutant Stu2 species to the Ndc80c junction restores wild-type function in vivo. These findings show that the role of Stu2 in tension-sensing depends on its association with kinetochores by binding with Ndc80c.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cell Biology

    Complex structures of Rsu1 and PINCH1 reveal a regulatory mechanism of the ILK/PINCH/Parvin complex for F-actin dynamics

    Haibin Yang et al.
    Research Article Updated

    Communications between actin filaments and integrin-mediated focal adhesion (FA) are crucial for cell adhesion and migration. As a core platform to organize FA proteins, the tripartite ILK/PINCH/Parvin (IPP) complex interacts with actin filaments to regulate the cytoskeleton-FA crosstalk. Rsu1, a Ras suppressor, is enriched in FA through PINCH1 and plays important roles in regulating F-actin structures. Here, we solved crystal structures of the Rsu1/PINCH1 complex, in which the leucine-rich-repeats of Rsu1 form a solenoid structure to tightly associate with the C-terminal region of PINCH1. Further structural analysis uncovered that the interaction between Rsu1 and PINCH1 blocks the IPP-mediated F-actin bundling by disrupting the binding of PINCH1 to actin. Consistently, overexpressing Rsu1 in HeLa cells impairs stress fiber formation and cell spreading. Together, our findings demonstrated that Rsu1 is critical for tuning the communication between F-actin and FA by interacting with the IPP complex and negatively modulating the F-actin bundling.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression

    Repressing Ago2 mRNA translation by Trim71 maintains pluripotency through inhibiting let-7 microRNAs

    Qiuying Liu et al.
    Research Article Updated

    The regulation of stem cell fate is poorly understood. Genetic studies in Caenorhabditis elegans lead to the hypothesis that a conserved cytoplasmic double-negative feedback loop consisting of the RNA-binding protein Trim71 and the let-7 microRNA controls the pluripotency and differentiation of stem cells. Although let-7-microRNA-mediated inhibition of Trim71 promotes differentiation, whether and how Trim71 regulates pluripotency and inhibits the let-7 microRNA are still unknown. Here, we show that Trim71 represses Ago2 mRNA translation in mouse embryonic stem cells. Blocking this repression leads to a specific post-transcriptional increase of mature let-7 microRNAs, resulting in let-7-dependent stemness defects and accelerated differentiation in the stem cells. These results not only support the Trim71-let-7-microRNA bi-stable switch model in controlling stem cell fate, but also reveal that repressing the conserved pro-differentiation let-7 microRNAs at the mature microRNA level by Ago2 availability is critical to maintaining pluripotency.