Damage to the right insula disrupts the perception of affective touch

  1. Louise P Kirsch  Is a corresponding author
  2. Sahba Besharati
  3. Christina Papadaki
  4. Laura Crucianelli
  5. Sara Bertagnoli
  6. Nick Ward
  7. Valentina Moro
  8. Paul M Jenkinson
  9. Aikaterini Fotopoulou
  1. Sorbonne Universite, France
  2. University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa
  3. University College London, United Kingdom
  4. University of Verona, Italy
  5. University of Hertfordshire, United Kingdom

Abstract

Specific, peripheral C-tactile afferents contribute to the perception of tactile pleasure, but the brain areas involved in their processing remain debated. We report the first human lesion study on the perception of C-tactile touch in right hemisphere stroke patients (N = 59), revealing that right posterior and anterior insula lesions reduce tactile, contralateral and ipsilateral pleasantness sensitivity, respectively. These findings corroborate previous imaging studies regarding the role of the posterior insula in the perception of affective touch. However, our findings about the crucial role of the anterior insula for ipsilateral affective touch perception open new avenues of enquiry regarding the cortical organization of this tactile system.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/fyrwc/?view_only=75773c749be84432994beca994481988).

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Louise P Kirsch

    Institut des Systèmes Intelligents et de Robotique, Sorbonne Universite, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    kirsch.lou@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8418-776X
  2. Sahba Besharati

    The Department of Psychology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Christina Papadaki

    Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Laura Crucianelli

    Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Sara Bertagnoli

    Department of Human Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Nick Ward

    Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Valentina Moro

    Department of Human Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Paul M Jenkinson

    Department of Psychology, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Aikaterini Fotopoulou

    Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

European Research Council (ERC-2012-STG GA313755)

  • Aikaterini Fotopoulou

MIUR Italy (PRIN 20159CZFJK)

  • Valentina Moro

University of Verona (Bando di Ateneo per la Ricerca di Base 2015 project MOTOS)

  • Valentina Moro

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Stephen Liberles, Harvard Medical School, United States

Ethics

Human subjects: All participants gave written, informed consent to take part in the study and to publish. The local National Health System Ethics Committees approved the study (REC:05/Q0706/218), which was carried out in accordance to the Declaration of Helsinki.

Version history

  1. Received: April 23, 2019
  2. Accepted: January 23, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: January 24, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: February 26, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Kirsch et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,878
    views
  • 362
    downloads
  • 51
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Louise P Kirsch
  2. Sahba Besharati
  3. Christina Papadaki
  4. Laura Crucianelli
  5. Sara Bertagnoli
  6. Nick Ward
  7. Valentina Moro
  8. Paul M Jenkinson
  9. Aikaterini Fotopoulou
(2020)
Damage to the right insula disrupts the perception of affective touch
eLife 9:e47895.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.47895

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.47895

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Max Schulz, Malte Wöstmann
    Insight

    Asymmetries in the size of structures deep below the cortex explain how alpha oscillations in the brain respond to shifts in attention.

    1. Neuroscience
    Tara Ghafari, Cecilia Mazzetti ... Ole Jensen
    Research Article

    Evidence suggests that subcortical structures play a role in high-level cognitive functions such as the allocation of spatial attention. While there is abundant evidence in humans for posterior alpha band oscillations being modulated by spatial attention, little is known about how subcortical regions contribute to these oscillatory modulations, particularly under varying conditions of cognitive challenge. In this study, we combined MEG and structural MRI data to investigate the role of subcortical structures in controlling the allocation of attentional resources by employing a cued spatial attention paradigm with varying levels of perceptual load. We asked whether hemispheric lateralization of volumetric measures of the thalamus and basal ganglia predicted the hemispheric modulation of alpha-band power. Lateral asymmetry of the globus pallidus, caudate nucleus, and thalamus predicted attention-related modulations of posterior alpha oscillations. When the perceptual load was applied to the target and the distractor was salient caudate nucleus asymmetry predicted alpha-band modulations. Globus pallidus was predictive of alpha-band modulations when either the target had a high load, or the distractor was salient, but not both. Finally, the asymmetry of the thalamus predicted alpha band modulation when neither component of the task was perceptually demanding. In addition to delivering new insight into the subcortical circuity controlling alpha oscillations with spatial attention, our finding might also have clinical applications. We provide a framework that could be followed for detecting how structural changes in subcortical regions that are associated with neurological disorders can be reflected in the modulation of oscillatory brain activity.