Multiplexed imaging of immune cells in staged multiple sclerosis lesions by mass cytometry

  1. Valeria Ramaglia  Is a corresponding author
  2. Salma Sheikh-Mohamed
  3. Karen Legg
  4. Calvin Park
  5. Olga L Rojas
  6. Stephanie Zandee
  7. Fred Fu
  8. Olga Ornatsky
  9. Eric C Swanson
  10. David Pitt
  11. Alexandre Prat
  12. Trevor D McKee
  13. Jennifer L Gommerman
  1. University of Toronto, Canada
  2. Yale School of Medicine, United States
  3. Université de Montréal, Canada
  4. University Health Network, Canada
  5. Fluidigm Canada Inc, Canada
8 figures, 3 tables and 1 additional file

Figures

Figure 1 with 4 supplements
Comparing IMC to IF in MS lesions.

Two serial sections were assessed: one used for immunofluorescence (IF, a and a’) and one dedicated to Imaging Mass Cytometry (IMC, a’’). (a) The region of interest (a’) was guided by the immunofluorescence staining with anti-PLP (proteolipid protein, shown in red to visualize myelin), and DAPI (shown in blue to visualize nuclei) for the identification of lesion location and type (see Figure 1—figure supplement 1). The entire region of interest on a serial section was subjected to IMC, according to the work flow shown in Figure 1—figure supplement 2. Staining with Iridium (Ir)-intercalator is shown in blue to visualize DNA in nuclei. A blow up area of the region of interest within an active lesion (referred to as a-1’ for IF and a-1’’ for IMC), was also stained with fluorochrome conjugated anti-CD3 (a-1’) or metal conjugated anti-CD3 (a-1’), both depicted in green. WML, white matter lesion; NAGM, normal-appearing gray matter. (b) Spearman correlation coefficient, showing a significant positive correlation between the number of nuclei identified with DAPI by IF and the number of nuclei identified with Ir-intercalator by IMC (n = 11, coefficient, r = 0.9182, p=0.0002). (c) Spearman correlation coefficient, showing a significant positive correlation between the number of CD3+ T cells identified with fluorochrome-conjugated antibody by IF and the number of CD3+ T cells identified with metal-conjugated antibody by IMC (n = 7, coefficient, r = 0.8929, p=0.01). Additional correlation analyses between fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies by IF and metal-conjugated antibodies by IMC are shown in Figure 1—figure supplement 4.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48051.003
Figure 1—figure supplement 1
Staging of MS lesions by IF.

General pathology: demyelinating lesions (arrows and arrows head in (a and b) seen in (a) hematoxylin and eosin (HE)/Luxol fast blue (LFB) stain of myelin and (b) oil red o (ORO) stain of neutral lipids within macrophages. Lesional pathology: demyelinating lesions (arrows in c and d) visualized by (c) proteolipid protein (PLP in red) stain of myelin and (d) human leukocyte antigen (HLA, in green) stain of microglia/macrophages. (e–j) Low magnification images of HLA and PLP stains, depicting the distribution and morphology of HLA+ microglia/macrophages and myelin in different sites and lesion stages. (e–f) (P)reactive lesion (block no. CR4A): Note the increase in microglia/macrophage reactivity at the (p)reactive lesion site compared to the normal-appearing white matter (NAWM), with normal-appearing PLP myelin stain seen (e) across the NAWM and (f) (p)reactive lesion. (g–h) Active demyelinating lesion (block no. CR4A): low glia reactivity and normal-appearing myelin stain is seen in the periplaque white matter (PPWM). Profound microglia/macrophage activation is seen (g) in the active lesion, where (h) myelin is being destroyed. (i–j) Mixed active-inactive demyelinating lesion (block no. CL3A): low glia reactivity and normal-appearing myelin stain is seen in the periplaque white matter (PPWM). An increased density of HLA+ cells with the morphology of microglia/macrophages is seen at the active lesion edge, with degraded PLP+ myelin within macrophages (arrows head in inset). In contrast, there are only few HLA+ cells at the inactive lesion core.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48051.004
Figure 1—figure supplement 2
Workflow of Imaging Mass Cytometry.

A panel is designed using pathologist-verified antibodies conjugated to metals. The brain tissue is stained simultaneously with a cocktail of all the metal-conjugated antibodies and placed into the Hyperion Imaging System. The tissue is ablated by a UV laser beam (λ = 219 nm). A plume of particles produced by the laser is taken up by a flow of inert helium or argon gas and introduced into the CyTOF mass cytometer (Hyperion Imaging System from Fluidigm (formerly DVS Sciences)). Isotopes associated with each spot are detected and indexed against the source location, yielding an intensity map of the target proteins throughout the tissue, creating spatially resolved images of multiple parameters. The acquired data are analyzed and visualized using heat maps.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48051.005
Figure 1—figure supplement 3
Validation of IMC staining patterns in MS lesions.

Core of an active demyelinating lesion, showing reduced proteolipid protein (PLP) stain by (a) immunohistochemistry, (b) immunofluorescence and (c) imaging mass cytometry and corresponding areas stained with anti-HLA to detect antigen presenting cells by (d) immunohistochemistry, (e) immunofluorescence and (f) imaging mass cytometry.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48051.006
Figure 1—figure supplement 4
Correlating IMC to IF staining patterns in MS lesions.

(a) Spearman correlation coefficient, showing a significant positive correlation between the % of PLP+ area identified with fluorochrome-conjugated antibody by IF and % of PLP+ area dentified with metal-conjugated antibody by IMC (n = 14, coefficient, r = 0.9544, p<0.0001). (b) Spearman correlation coefficient, showing a significant positive correlation between the number of HLA+ cells identified with fluorochrome-conjugated antibody by IF and the number of HLA+ T cells identified with metal-conjugated antibody by IMC (n = 15, coefficient, r = 0.9794, p<0.0001). (c) Spearman correlation coefficient, showing a significant positive correlation between the number of CD68+ cells identified with fluorochrome-conjugated antibody by IF and the number of CD68+ T cells identified with metal-conjugated antibody by IMC (n = 15, coefficient, r = 0.9051, p<0.0001).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48051.007
Figure 2 with 1 supplement
Validation of IMC specificity in MS lesions.

(a) Overlay of CD3 (green) and CD45 (red) identifies CD3+CD45+ T cells (solid arrows) and CD3-CD45+ leukocytes other than T cells (dotted arrow). (b) Overlay of CD3 (green) and CD68 (red) identifies CD3+CD68- T cells (solid arrows) and CD3-CD68+microglia/macrophages (dotted arrow). Note that the solid arrows in a and b indicates the same CD3+CD45+CD68- T cells. (c) Overlay of κ (white), CD3 (green) and CD68 (red) and (d) overlay of λ (white), CD3 (green) and CD68 (red) identify κ+CD3-CD68- B cells (arrow head in c) that are λ-CD3-CD68- (arrow head in d) and κ-CD3-CD68- B cells (arrow in c) that are λ+CD3-CD68- (arrow in d), as expected based on the allelic exclusion of κ and λ. (e) Overlay of CD31 (green), CD68 (red) and Collagen (blue) identifies CD31+Collagen+CD68- endothelial cells (arrow head) and CD31-Collagen-CD68+ microglia/macrophages (arrows). (f, g) Granzyme B+ cells (arrows). Images in (a and b) as well as images in c) and d) are from the same areas of an active demyelinating lesion. Image in (e) are from the edge of an active demyelinating lesion. Images in (f and g) are from the center of an active demyelinating lesion.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48051.008
Figure 2—figure supplement 1
Example of active lesion in which 8 analytes are displayed simultaneously.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48051.009
Staging of MS lesions by IMC.

Representative mass cytometry images of white matter areas of (a, f) healthy control, (b, g) MS normal-appearing white matter (block no. CR4A), (c, h) MS (p)reactive lesion (block no. CR4A), (d–i) MS active demyelinating lesion (block no. CR4A) and (e–j) an MS mixed active-inactive demyelinating lesion (block no. CL3A). For each region of interest, we show the same area simultaneously labeled with markers of myelin (proteolipid protein, PLP), antigen presentation (human leukocyte antigen, HLA) to detect microglia/macrophages and DNA (intercalator). (a–e) Images of PLP (red) and (f–i) overlay of HLA (green) and intercalator (blue) show the lesion activity in staged MS lesions compared to control white matter and normal-appearing white matter. (k, l) Overlay of PLP, HLA and intercalator show microglia/macrophages containing PLP+ myelin protein in the core of (k) an active lesion and (l) in the edge of a slowly expanding lesion, indicative of demyelinating activity. PPWM, periplaque white matter; BV, blood vessel.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48051.010
Pattern of microglia or macrophage activity in different stages of MS lesions by IMC.

Representative mass cytometry images of (a, a’, b, b’) control white matter, (c, c’, d, d’) normal-appearing white matter (block no. CR4A), (e, e’, f, f’) (p)reactive lesion (block no. CR4A), (g, g’, h, h’) active demyelinating lesion (block no. CR4A) and (i, i’, j, j’) mixed active-inactive demyelinating lesion (block no. CL3A). For each region of interest, we show the same area simultaneously labeled with markers of antigen presentation (human leukocyte antigen, HLA) to detect microglia and/or macrophages, TMEM119 to detect microglia, lysosomes (CD68) to detect phagocytic cells and DNA (Ir-intercalator). (a, a’– i, i’) Overlay of TMEM119 (red), HLA (green) and Ir-intercalator (blue) identifies (dotted arrows in a’ and c’) TMEM119+HLA- resting microglia with thin elongated processes and (arrows head in a’,c’, e’, i’ and e’’) TMEM119+HLA+ activated microglia or (solid arrows in a’, c’, e’, g’, i’ and g’’) TMEM119-HLA+ activated macrophages. (b, b’–j, j’’) Overlay of CD68 (red), HLA (green) and Ir-intercalator (blue) identifies HLA+CD68+ phagocytic microglia/macrophages. PPWM, periplaque white matter; BV, blood vessel.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48051.011
Pattern of T cell subpopulations in different stages of MS lesions by IMC.

Representative mass cytometry images of (a, a’, b, b’) white matter of control, (c, c’, d, d’) normal-appearing white matter (block no. CR4A), (e, e’, f, f’) (p)reactive lesion (block no. CR4A), (g, g’, h, h’, o) active demyelinating lesion (block no. CR4A) and (i, i’, j–n) mixed active-inactive demyelinating lesion (block no. CL3A). For each region of interest, we show the same area simultaneously labeled with anti-collagen antibodies to visuzliae blood vessels, all T cells (CD3), CD8α T cells, cell proliferation (Ki67) and DNA (Ir-intercalator). (a, a’– i, i’) Overlay of collagen (white), CD3 (green), CD8α (red) and Ir-intercalator (blue) identifies (dotted arrows in c’, e’, g’ and i’) CD3+CD8α+ T cells, (solid arrows in c’, e’, g’ and i’) CD3+CD8α- (therefore by exclusion putative CD4+) T cells and collagen+ blood vessels. (b–b’–j, j’’) Overlay of CD3 (in green), CD8α (red), NFAT1 (in white) and Ir-intercalator (in blue) identifies (yellow arrow head in h’, j’ and j’’) CD3+CD8α+NFAT1+ T cells and (white solid arrow in j’) CD3+CD8α-NFAT1+ (putative CD4+) T cells. (white arrow head in h’ and j’) CD3-CD8α-NFAT1+ cells are also detected. (o) Overlay of CD3 (in green), Ki67 (red) and Ir-intercalator (in blue) identifies CD3+Ki67+ proliferating T cells (dotted arrow) and CD3-Ki67+ proliferating cells other than T cells (solid arrows and inset). PPWM, periplaque white matter.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48051.012
Pattern of immunoglobulins and B cell subpopulations in different stages of MS lesions by IMC.

Representative mass cytometry images of (a, a’, b, b’) white matter of control, (c, c’, d, d’) normal-appearing white matter (block no. CR4A), (e, e’, f, f’) a (p)reactive lesion (block no. CR4A), (g, g’, h, h’, o) an active demyelinating lesion (block no. CR4A) and (i, i’, j–n) a mixed active-inactive demyelinating lesion (block no. CL3A). For each region of interest, we show the same area simultaneously labeled with markers of endothelial cells (collagen) to detect blood vessels, immunoglobulin M (IgM), the κ or λ light chain of immunoglobulins (Igκ/Igλ) to detect B cells and DNA (Ir-intercalator). (a, a–i, i’) Overlay of collagen (red), IgM (green) and Ir-intercalator (blue) identifies cellular (intercalator-associated, dotted arrows in g’ and i’) and non-cellular (free immunoglobulin, arrows head in a’, c’, e’, i’) IgM in the parenchyma or within collagen+ blood vessels. (b, b’–j, j’) Overlay of IgM (green), Igκ/Igλ (red) and Ir-intercalator (blue) identifies (dotted arrow in d’, h’ and j’) Igκ/Igλ+IgM+ naïve and IgM memory B cells and (solid arrows in d’, f’, h’ and j’) Igκ/Igλ+IgM- class switch B cells.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48051.013
Figure 7 with 6 supplements
Density of immune cell subsets in different stages of MS lesions and their distance from blood vessels by IMC.

(a) Cell counts are provided as number of cells per mm2 (Barnett and Prineas, 2004) of region of interest. The category of cells is defined according to the expression of cell-specific and functional markers as indicated and also described in Table 2. (b) Distance between defined categories of cells and blood vessels (collagen+) are provided in μm. NAWM, normal-appearing white matter; PPWM, periplaque white matter; Act dem, active demyelinating; act inact dem, active-inactive demyelinating. The single-cell segmentation strategy is shown in Figure 7—figure supplement 1. The Positive and negative ‘gates’ used to identify each cell subset were established based on the quadrants defined by manually-identified cells according to the pipeline shown in Figure 7—figure supplements 24 and laid out in Figure 7—figure supplement 5. Please see the section ‘Gating strategy for quantitative analysis of T cell, B cell, macrophage and microglial cell subsets’ in the Materials and methods. The gating strategy used for the generation of heat maps is laid out in Figure 7—figure supplement 6. Source files used for the quantitative analysis are provided in Figure 7—source data 1.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48051.014
Figure 7—source data 1

Source file for quantitative data of all ROI.

ROI 2 from block 95–056 (white matter control) ROI one from block CL3a (active lesion) ROI 2.1 from block CL3a (mixed active-inactive lesion) ROI 2.2 from block CL3a (mixed active-inactive lesion) ROI three from block CL3a (mixed active-inactive lesion) ROI four from block CL3a (active lesion) ROI two from block CR4a (mixed active-inactive lesion) ROI four from block CR4a (active lesion) ROI eight from block CR4a (normal-appearing white matter) ROI three from block CR4a (active lesion) ROI one from block CR4a ((p)reactive lesion) ROI five from block CR4a (active lesion) ROI six from block CR4a (mixed active-inactive lesion).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48051.021
Figure 7—figure supplement 1
Single cell segmentation and validation of approach using anti-CD3.

A Gaussian blur was applied to the DNA signal (nucleus detection - a), and the resulting blurred image was segmented to identify nuclear content corresponding to individual cell areas using a combination of threshold and watershed filters (cell simulation - b). Subsequently, we interrogated the segmented image for the presence of specific markers or combinations of markers that are either biologically co-expressed, or whose expression is mutually exclusive. In this example we show CD3 (example of validation - c).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48051.015
Figure 7—figure supplement 2
Manual selection of myeloid cells.

(a) Representation of manually-annotated cells in an active lesion, based on the detection of nuclei. (b) Segmented cells. (c–h) Identification of cells that express (for example CD45+HLA+) or do not express (for example Igκ/Igλ-CD3-) a biologically relevant set of markers. (i) Classification of myeloid cells. Purple arrows were used throughout (c–i) to track myeloid cells.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48051.016
Figure 7—figure supplement 3
Manual selection of T cells.

(a) Representation of manually-annotated cells in an active lesion, based on the detection of nuclei. (b) Segmented cells. (c–h) Identification of cells that express (for example CD45+CD3+CD4+ or CD8+) or do not express (for example Igκ/Igλ-) a biologically relevant set of markers. (i) Classification of T cells. Red arrows were used throughout (c–i) to track CD8+ T cells. Green arrows were used throughout c–i) to track CD4+ T cells. Cyan arrows were used throughout (c–i) to track CD4+ proliferating T cells.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48051.017
Figure 7—figure supplement 4
Manual selection of B cells.

(a) Representation of manually-annotated cells in a mixed active-inactive lesion, based on the detection of nuclei. (b) Segmented cells. (c–h) Identification of cells that express (for example CD45+Igκ/Igλ+) or do not express (for example CD3-CD4-CD8-) a biologically relevant set of markers. (i) Classification of B cells. Magenta arrows were used throughout c–i) to track B cells.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48051.018
Figure 7—figure supplement 5
Gating strategy used for the identification of cell subsets.

Gating strategy for the identification of cell subset phenotypes and activation states of microglia, macrophages, T cells and B cells. In brief, the per-cell mean intensities of specific marker combinations are shown here in 2D log-log biaxial scatterplots. Gates were established based on pathologist-verified positive cells (see colored cells superimposed into each dotplot contrasting with non-verified cells in gray).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48051.019
Figure 7—figure supplement 6
Gating strategy used for the generation of heat maps.

Using the quadrants that capture the appropriate positivity range of each cell phenotype shown in Figure 7—figure supplement 5, cells were subjected to the positive and negative gating strategies as outlined in the Materials and methods for each lineage and indicated in (a). Subsequently, these cells were plotted for the marker combinations listed in Table 2. The frequency of cells in each quadrant are indicated. Note that some CD3+CD45+ T cells could not be classified because they fell outside of the specified gates for either of the two markers – CD8+ cells that were not simultaneously CD4-, or CD4+ cells that were not simultaneously CD8-. This is due to the dynamic range of these particular markers and thus our inability to get a clean CD4+CD8- or CD4-CD8+ T cell population. Cells that fulfilled the gating criteria specified above each image, but which did not fulfill the requirements for classification as Macrophages, Microglia, B cells or T cells, are shown in blue.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48051.020
Heat-diffusion Affinity-based Transition Embedding (PHATE) mapping of T cells.

(a–c) PHATE plots of all T cells analyzed in this study, colored by (a) cell class, (b) lesion type of residence and (c) relative marker expression intensity or distance to blood vessels. The heatmap scales in (c) represent the range of Z-score normalized values for a given parameter. NAWM = normal appearing white matter; BV = blood vessels; t1 = identified T cell cluster (see text for explanation).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48051.022

Tables

Key resources table
Reagent type
(species) or resource
DesignationSource or referenceIdentifiersAdditional
information
AntibodyAnti-Nucleic Acid-Ir191/Ir193FluidigmCat#:201192A
RRID: AB_2810850
IMC: (1/3000)
AntibodyAnti-Proteolipid Protein-141Pr (Mouse monoclonal)Bio-RadCat#: MCA839G
RRID:AB_2237198
IMC: (1/25), IF: (1/25), IHC: (1/100)
AntibodyAnti-human
CD38-167Er (Mouse monoclonal)
FluidigmCat#:3167001B
RRID: AB_2802110
IMC: (1/2000)
AntibodyAnti-human CD45-154Sm (Mouse monoclonal)FluidigmCat#: 3154001B
RRID:AB_2810854
IMC: (1/2000)
AntibodyAnti-human CD68-159Tb (Mouse monoclonal)FluidigmCat#: 3159035D
RRID:AB_2810859
IMC: (1/100)
AntibodyAnti-human HLA-147Sm (Mouse monoclonal)FluidigmCat#: Ab55152
RRID: AB_944199
IMC: (1/100), IF: (1/50), IHC: (1/100)
AntibodyAnti-human TMEM119-155Gd (Rabbit polyclonal)Sigma-AldrichCat#: HPA051870
RRID: AB_2681645
IMC: (1/50), IF: (1/100)
AntibodyAnti-human CD3-170Er (Mouse monoclonalFluidigmCat#: 3170001
RRID: AB_2661807
IMC: (1/100)
AntibodyAnti-human CD4-176Yb (Mouse monoclonal)BioLegendCat#:344602
RRID: AB_1937277
IMC: (1/100), IF: (1/20)
AntibodyAnti-human CD8a-162Dy (Mouse monoclonal)FluidigmCat#: 3162015B
RRID:AB_2661802
IMC: (1/100)
AntibodyAnti-human Granzyme B-171Yb (Mouse monoclonal)ThermoFisher ScientificCat#: MA1-80734
RRID:AB_931084
IMC: (1/25), IF: (1/20)
AntibodyAnti-human IgKappa-160Gd (Mouse monoclonal)FluidigmCat#:3160005B
RRID:AB_2810855
IMC: (1/3000)
AntibodyAnti-human IgLambda-151-Eu (Mouse monoclonal)FluidigmCat#: 3151004B
RRID:AB_2810853
IMC: (1/3000)
AntibodyAnti-human IgM-172Yb (Mouse monoclonal)FluidigmCat#: 3172004B
RRID:AB_2810858
IMC: (1/500)
AntibodyAnti-human Collagen Type I-169Tm (Goat polyclonal)FluidigmCat#: 3169023D
RRID:AB_2810857
IMC: (1/4000)
AntibodyAnti-human CD31-145Nd (Mouse polyclonal)LSBioCat#: LS-C390863
RRID:AB_2810860
IMC: (1/100)
AntibodyAnti-human NFAT1-143Nd (Rabbit monoclonal)FluidigmCat#: 3143023A
RRID:AB_2810851
IMC: (1/50)
AntibodyAnti-human Ki67-168Er (Mouse monoclonal)FluidigmCat#: 3168001B
RRID:AB_2810856
IMC: (1/100)
Table 1
Lesion types and regions of interest.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48051.023
CaseTissue block (anatomical location)Lesion typeRegion of interest
C,
95–056
A
(superior frontal gyrus)
WMC
MS,
AB129
CL3a
(cerebellum)
NAWM
2x Active demyelinating (pattern II)PPWM, center
3x Mixed active/inactive demyelinatingPPWM, edge, core
CR4a
(cerebellum)
NAWM
(p)reactive
3x Active demyelinating (pattern II)center
2x Mixed active/inactive demyelinatingedge, core
  1. C, control; MS, multiple sclerosis; WMC, white matter of control; NAWM, normal-appearing white matter; PPWM, periplaque white matter.

Table 2
Antibody panels for the identification of functional cell types by IMC.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48051.024
Functional cell typeAntibody panel
Macrophages and microglia
MacrophagesCD45highHLA+TMEM119-
Activated macrophagesCD45highHLA+TMEM119-CD68+PLP-
Demyelinating macrophagesCD45highHLA+TMEM119-CD68+PLP+
MicrogliaCD45low/+HLA+TMEM119+
Activated microgliaCD45low/+HLA+TMEM119+CD68+PLP-
Demyelinating microgliaCD45low/+HLA+TMEM119+CD68+PLP+
T Cells
CD8+ T cellsCD45+CD3+CD8α+CD4-
Proliferating CD8+ T cellsCD45+CD8α+CD3+CD4-Ki67+
Activated CD8+ T cellsCD45+CD3+CD8α+CD4-NFAT+
Activated and proliferating CD8+ T cellsCD45+CD3+CD8α+CD4-NFAT+Ki67+
‘Chronically activated’ CD8+ T cellsCD45+CD3+CD8α-CD8+CD38+HLA+
CD4+ T cellsCD45+CD3+CD8α-CD4+
Proliferating CD4+ T cellsCD45+CD8α-CD3+CD4+Ki67+
Activated CD4+ T cellsCD45+CD3+CD8α-CD4+NFAT+
Activated and proliferating CD4+ T cellsCD45+CD3+CD8α-CD4+NFAT+Ki67+
‘Chronically activated’ CD4+ T cellsCD45+CD3+CD8α-CD4+CD38+HLA+
B Cells
Naïve B CellsCD45+Igκ/Igλ+IgM+CD38-
IgM memory B cellsCD45+Igκ/Igλ+IgM+CD38+
Switched memory B cellsCD45+Igκ/Igλ+IgM-CD38+

Additional files

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Valeria Ramaglia
  2. Salma Sheikh-Mohamed
  3. Karen Legg
  4. Calvin Park
  5. Olga L Rojas
  6. Stephanie Zandee
  7. Fred Fu
  8. Olga Ornatsky
  9. Eric C Swanson
  10. David Pitt
  11. Alexandre Prat
  12. Trevor D McKee
  13. Jennifer L Gommerman
(2019)
Multiplexed imaging of immune cells in staged multiple sclerosis lesions by mass cytometry
eLife 8:e48051.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48051