Variable prediction accuracy of polygenic scores within an ancestry group

  1. Hakhamanesh Mostafavi  Is a corresponding author
  2. Arbel Harpak  Is a corresponding author
  3. Ipsita Agarwal
  4. Dalton Conley
  5. Jonathan K Pritchard
  6. Molly Przeworski  Is a corresponding author
  1. Columbia University, United States
  2. Princeton University, United States
  3. Stanford University, United States

Abstract

Fields as diverse as human genetics and sociology are increasingly using polygenic scores based on genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for phenotypic prediction. However, recent work has shown that polygenic scores have limited portability across groups of different genetic ancestries, restricting the contexts in which they can be used reliably and potentially creating serious inequities in future clinical applications. Using the UK Biobank data, we demonstrate that even within a single ancestry group (i.e., when there are negligible differences in linkage disequilibrium or in causal alleles frequencies), the prediction accuracy of polygenic scores can depend on characteristics such as the socio-economic status, age or sex of the individuals in which the GWAS and the prediction were conducted, as well as on the GWAS design. Our findings highlight both the complexities of interpreting polygenic scores and underappreciated obstacles to their broad use.

Data availability

The GWAS summary statistics generated in this study have been uploaded to Dryad.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Hakhamanesh Mostafavi

    Department of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    hsm2137@columbia.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1060-2844
  2. Arbel Harpak

    Department of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    ah3586@columbia.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3655-748X
  3. Ipsita Agarwal

    Department of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Dalton Conley

    Department of Sociology, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Jonathan K Pritchard

    Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8828-5236
  6. Molly Przeworski

    Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    mp3284@columbia.edu
    Competing interests
    Molly Przeworski, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5369-9009

Funding

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM121372)

  • Molly Przeworski

National Human Genome Research Institute (HG008140)

  • Jonathan K Pritchard

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (84337817)

  • Dalton Conley

Simons Foundation (633313)

  • Arbel Harpak

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: This study has been conducted using the UK Biobank resource under application Number 11138, as approved by Columbia University Institutional Review Board, protocol AAAS2914.

Copyright

© 2020, Mostafavi et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 11,331
    views
  • 1,592
    downloads
  • 279
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Hakhamanesh Mostafavi
  2. Arbel Harpak
  3. Ipsita Agarwal
  4. Dalton Conley
  5. Jonathan K Pritchard
  6. Molly Przeworski
(2020)
Variable prediction accuracy of polygenic scores within an ancestry group
eLife 9:e48376.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48376

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48376

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Jessica Gray, Von Vergel L Torres ... Ian R Henderson
    Research Article

    Klebsiella pneumoniae is a global public health concern due to the rising myriad of hypervirulent and multidrug-resistant clones both alarmingly associated with high mortality. The molecular mechanisms underpinning these recalcitrant K. pneumoniae infection, and how virulence is coupled with the emergence of lineages resistant to nearly all present-day clinically important antimicrobials, are unclear. In this study, we performed a genome-wide screen in K. pneumoniae ECL8, a member of the endemic K2-ST375 pathotype most often reported in Asia, to define genes essential for growth in a nutrient-rich laboratory medium (Luria-Bertani [LB] medium), human urine, and serum. Through transposon directed insertion-site sequencing (TraDIS), a total of 427 genes were identified as essential for growth on LB agar, whereas transposon insertions in 11 and 144 genes decreased fitness for growth in either urine or serum, respectively. These studies not only provide further knowledge on the genetics of this pathogen but also provide a strong impetus for discovering new antimicrobial targets to improve current therapeutic options for K. pneumoniae infections.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Nathan D Harry, Christina Zakas
    Research Article

    New developmental programs can evolve through adaptive changes to gene expression. The annelid Streblospio benedicti has a developmental dimorphism, which provides a unique intraspecific framework for understanding the earliest genetic changes that take place during developmental divergence. Using comparative RNAseq through ontogeny, we find that only a small proportion of genes are differentially expressed at any time, despite major differences in larval development and life history. These genes shift expression profiles across morphs by either turning off any expression in one morph or changing the timing or amount of gene expression. We directly connect the contributions of these mechanisms to differences in developmental processes. We examine F1 offspring – using reciprocal crosses – to determine maternal mRNA inheritance and the regulatory architecture of gene expression. These results highlight the importance of both novel gene expression and heterochronic shifts in developmental evolution, as well as the trans-acting regulatory factors in initiating divergence.