Rats exhibit similar biases in foraging and intertemporal choice tasks

  1. Gary A Kane  Is a corresponding author
  2. Aaron M Bornstein
  3. Amitai Shenhav
  4. Robert C Wilson
  5. Nathaniel D Daw
  6. Jonathan D Cohen
  1. Princeton University, United States
  2. Brown University, United States
  3. University of Arizona, United States

Abstract

Animals, including humans, consistently exhibit myopia in two different contexts: foraging, in which they harvest locally beyond what is predicted by optimal foraging theory, and intertemporal choice, in which they exhibit a preference for immediate vs. delayed rewards beyond what is predicted by rational (exponential) discounting. Despite the similarity in behavior between these two contexts, previous efforts to reconcile these observations in terms of a consistent pattern of time preferences have failed. Here, via extensive behavioral testing and quantitative modeling, we show that rats exhibit similar time preferences in both contexts: they prefer immediate vs. delayed rewards and they are sensitive to opportunity costs of delays to future decisions. Further, a quasi-hyperbolic discounting model, a form of hyperbolic discounting with separate components for short- and long-term rewards, explains individual rats' time preferences across both contexts, providing evidence for a common mechanism for myopic behavior in foraging and intertemporal choice.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Gary A Kane

    Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    For correspondence
    gkane@rowland.harvard.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7703-5055
  2. Aaron M Bornstein

    Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6251-6000
  3. Amitai Shenhav

    Department of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Robert C Wilson

    Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2963-2971
  5. Nathaniel D Daw

    Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5029-1430
  6. Jonathan D Cohen

    Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

National Institute of Mental Health (F31MH109286)

  • Gary A Kane
  • Jonathan D Cohen

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Geoffrey Schoenbaum, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All procedures were approved by the Princeton University (Protocol 1969) and Rutgers University (Protocol 14-075) Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees.

Version history

  1. Received: May 14, 2019
  2. Accepted: September 17, 2019
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: September 18, 2019 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: October 15, 2019 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2019, Kane et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,466
    Page views
  • 335
    Downloads
  • 13
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Gary A Kane
  2. Aaron M Bornstein
  3. Amitai Shenhav
  4. Robert C Wilson
  5. Nathaniel D Daw
  6. Jonathan D Cohen
(2019)
Rats exhibit similar biases in foraging and intertemporal choice tasks
eLife 8:e48429.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48429

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48429

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Domingos Leite de Castro, Miguel Aroso ... Paulo Aguiar
    Research Article Updated

    Closed-loop neuronal stimulation has a strong therapeutic potential for neurological disorders such as Parkinson’s disease. However, at the moment, standard stimulation protocols rely on continuous open-loop stimulation and the design of adaptive controllers is an active field of research. Delayed feedback control (DFC), a popular method used to control chaotic systems, has been proposed as a closed-loop technique for desynchronisation of neuronal populations but, so far, was only tested in computational studies. We implement DFC for the first time in neuronal populations and access its efficacy in disrupting unwanted neuronal oscillations. To analyse in detail the performance of this activity control algorithm, we used specialised in vitro platforms with high spatiotemporal monitoring/stimulating capabilities. We show that the conventional DFC in fact worsens the neuronal population oscillatory behaviour, which was never reported before. Conversely, we present an improved control algorithm, adaptive DFC (aDFC), which monitors the ongoing oscillation periodicity and self-tunes accordingly. aDFC effectively disrupts collective neuronal oscillations restoring a more physiological state. Overall, these results support aDFC as a better candidate for therapeutic closed-loop brain stimulation.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Computational and Systems Biology
    Sara Latini, Veronica Venafra ... Francesca Sacco
    Research Article

    Currently, the identification of patient-specific therapies in cancer is mainly informed by personalized genomic analysis. In the setting of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), patient-drug treatment matching fails in a subset of patients harboring atypical internal tandem duplications (ITDs) in the tyrosine kinase domain of the FLT3 gene. To address this unmet medical need, here we develop a systems-based strategy that integrates multiparametric analysis of crucial signaling pathways, and patient-specific genomic and transcriptomic data with a prior knowledge signaling network using a Boolean-based formalism. By this approach, we derive personalized predictive models describing the signaling landscape of AML FLT3-ITD positive cell lines and patients. These models enable us to derive mechanistic insight into drug resistance mechanisms and suggest novel opportunities for combinatorial treatments. Interestingly, our analysis reveals that the JNK kinase pathway plays a crucial role in the tyrosine kinase inhibitor response of FLT3-ITD cells through cell cycle regulation. Finally, our work shows that patient-specific logic models have the potential to inform precision medicine approaches.