Local axonal morphology guides the topography of interneuron myelination in mouse and human neocortex

Abstract

GABAergic fast-spiking parvalbumin-positive (PV) interneurons are frequently myelinated in the cerebral cortex. However, the factors governing the topography of cortical interneuron myelination remain incompletely understood. Here, we report that segmental myelination along neocortical interneuron axons is strongly predicted by the joint combination of interbranch distance and local axon caliber. Enlargement of PV+ interneurons increased axonal myelination, while reduced cell size led to decreased myelination. Next, we considered regular-spiking SOM+ cells, which normally have relatively shorter interbranch distances and thinner axon diameters than PV+ cells, and are rarely myelinated. Consistent with the importance of axonal morphology for guiding interneuron myelination, enlargement of SOM+ cell size dramatically increased the frequency of myelinated axonal segments. Lastly, we confirm that these findings also extend to human neocortex by quantifying interneuron axonal myelination from ex vivo surgical tissue. Together, these findings establish a predictive model of neocortical GABAergic interneuron myelination determined by local axonal morphology.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for Figures 1-9. Fiji ImageJ code for semi-automated reconstruction of axon diameter has been provided as an additional file. Human and mouse PV cell reconstructions will be uploaded to NeuroMorpho (http://neuromorpho.org/).

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jeffrey Stedehouder

    Department of Psychiatry, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Demi Brizee

    Department of Psychiatry, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Johan A Slotman

    Erasmus Optical Imaging Centre, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9705-9620
  4. Maria Pascual-Garcia

    Department of Psychiatry, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Megan L Leyrer

    Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5670-4005
  6. Bibi LJ Bouwen

    Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Clemens MF Dirven

    Department of Neurosurgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Zhenyu Gao

    Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4979-2366
  9. David M Berson

    Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Adriaan B Houtsmuller

    Erasmus Optical Imaging Centre, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Steven A Kushner

    Department of Psychiatry, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
    For correspondence
    s.kushner@erasmusmc.nl
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9777-3338

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (NEURON-JTC2018-024)

  • Steven A Kushner

ZonMw (40-00812-98-15030)

  • Steven A Kushner

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (834.12.002)

  • Steven A Kushner

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Sacha B Nelson, Brandeis University, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (IG 15-064) of the Dutch Ethical Committee (DEC). The protocol was approved by the Netherlands Centrale Commissie Dierproeven (Permit Number: AVD1010020173544). All surgery was performed under isoflurane anesthesia, and every effort was made to minimize suffering.

Human subjects: All procedures regarding human tissue were performed with the approval of the Medical Ethical Committee of the Erasmus University Medical Center. Written informed consent of each patient was provided in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration.

Version history

  1. Received: May 20, 2019
  2. Accepted: November 18, 2019
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: November 19, 2019 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: December 23, 2019 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2019, Stedehouder et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,799
    views
  • 464
    downloads
  • 53
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jeffrey Stedehouder
  2. Demi Brizee
  3. Johan A Slotman
  4. Maria Pascual-Garcia
  5. Megan L Leyrer
  6. Bibi LJ Bouwen
  7. Clemens MF Dirven
  8. Zhenyu Gao
  9. David M Berson
  10. Adriaan B Houtsmuller
  11. Steven A Kushner
(2019)
Local axonal morphology guides the topography of interneuron myelination in mouse and human neocortex
eLife 8:e48615.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48615

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48615

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Neuroscience
    Kenneth Chiou, Noah Snyder-Mackler
    Insight

    Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals the extent to which marmosets carry genetically distinct cells from their siblings.

    1. Neuroscience
    Flavio J Schmidig, Simon Ruch, Katharina Henke
    Research Article

    We are unresponsive during slow-wave sleep but continue monitoring external events for survival. Our brain wakens us when danger is imminent. If events are non-threatening, our brain might store them for later consideration to improve decision-making. To test this hypothesis, we examined whether novel vocabulary consisting of simultaneously played pseudowords and translation words are encoded/stored during sleep, and which neural-electrical events facilitate encoding/storage. An algorithm for brain-state-dependent stimulation selectively targeted word pairs to slow-wave peaks or troughs. Retrieval tests were given 12 and 36 hr later. These tests required decisions regarding the semantic category of previously sleep-played pseudowords. The sleep-played vocabulary influenced awake decision-making 36 hr later, if targeted to troughs. The words’ linguistic processing raised neural complexity. The words’ semantic-associative encoding was supported by increased theta power during the ensuing peak. Fast-spindle power ramped up during a second peak likely aiding consolidation. Hence, new vocabulary played during slow-wave sleep was stored and influenced decision-making days later.