Optical dopamine monitoring with dLight1 reveals mesolimbic phenotypes in a mouse model of neurofibromatosis type 1
- California Institute of Technology, United States
- University of California, Davis, United States
Abstract
Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is an autosomal dominant disorder whose neurodevelopmental symptoms include impaired executive function, attention, and spatial learning that could be due to perturbed mesolimbic dopaminergic circuitry. However, these circuits have never been directly assayed in vivo. We employed the genetically encoded optical dopamine sensor dLight1 to monitor dopaminergic neurotransmission in the ventral striatum of NF1 mice during motivated behavior. Additionally, we developed novel systemic AAV vectors to facilitate morphological reconstruction of dopaminergic populations in cleared tissue. We found that NF1 mice exhibit reduced spontaneous dopaminergic neurotransmission that was associated with excitation/inhibition imbalance in the ventral tegmental area and abnormal neuronal morphology. NF1 mice also had more robust dopaminergic and behavioral responses to salient visual stimuli, which were stimulus-dependent, independent of learning, and rescued by optogenetic inhibition of non-dopaminergic neurons in the VTA. Overall, these studies provide a first in vivo characterization of dopaminergic circuit function in the context of NF1 and reveal novel pathophysiological mechanisms.
Data availability
Viral vector plasmids used in this study are available on Addgene at http://www.addgene.org/Viviana_Gradinaru/. Codes used for fiber photometry signal extraction and analysis are available at https://github.com/GradinaruLab/dLight1. Source data is available at www.doi.org/10.7303/syn18904024.
Article and author information
Author details
J Elliott Robinson
Funding
National Institutes of Health (IDP20D017782-01)
- Viviana Gradinaru
National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Postgraduate Scholarship-Doctoral)
- Gerard M Coughlin
National Institutes of Health (PECASE)
- Viviana Gradinaru
National Institutes of Health (RF1MH117069)
- Viviana Gradinaru
National Science Foundation (1707316)
- Viviana Gradinaru
Heritage Medical Research Institute
- Viviana Gradinaru
Tianqiao and Chrissy Chen Institute for Neuroscience
- Viviana Gradinaru
National Institutes of Health (U01NS103522)
- Lin Tian
National Institutes of Health (DP2MH107056)
- Lin Tian
Children's Tumor Foundation (Young Investigator Award 2016-01-00)
- J Elliott Robinson
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Reviewing Editor
- Inna Slutsky, Tel Aviv University, Israel
Ethics
Animal experimentation: Animal husbandry and experimental procedures involving animal subjects were conducted in compliance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) and by the Office of Laboratory Animal Resources at the California Institute of Technology under IACUC protocol 1730.
Version history
- Received: June 2, 2019
- Accepted: September 21, 2019
- Accepted Manuscript published: September 23, 2019 (version 1)
- Version of Record published: October 29, 2019 (version 2)
- Version of Record updated: November 8, 2019 (version 3)
- Version of Record updated: November 26, 2019 (version 4)
- Version of Record updated: January 20, 2020 (version 5)
Copyright
© 2019, Robinson et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 9,622
- views
-
- 995
- downloads
-
- 32
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Optical dopamine monitoring with dLight1 reveals mesolimbic phenotypes in a mouse model of neurofibromatosis type 1
eLife 8:e48983.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48983
Further reading
-
- Neuroscience
Songbirds’ vocal mastery is impressive, but to what extent is it a result of practice? Can they, based on experienced mismatch with a known target, plan the necessary changes to recover the target in a practice-free manner without intermittently singing? In adult zebra finches, we drive the pitch of a song syllable away from its stable (baseline) variant acquired from a tutor, then we withdraw reinforcement and subsequently deprive them of singing experience by muting or deafening. In this deprived state, birds do not recover their baseline song. However, they revert their songs toward the target by about 1 standard deviation of their recent practice, provided the sensory feedback during the latter signaled a pitch mismatch with the target. Thus, targeted vocal plasticity does not require immediate sensory experience, showing that zebra finches are capable of goal-directed vocal planning.
-
- Neuroscience
Pavlovian fear conditioning has been extensively used to study the behavioral and neural basis of defensive systems. In a typical procedure, a cue is paired with foot shock, and subsequent cue presentation elicits freezing, a behavior theoretically linked to predator detection. Studies have since shown a fear conditioned cue can elicit locomotion, a behavior that – in addition to jumping, and rearing – is theoretically linked to imminent or occurring predation. A criticism of studies observing fear conditioned cue-elicited locomotion is that responding is non-associative. We gave rats Pavlovian fear discrimination over a baseline of reward seeking. TTL-triggered cameras captured 5 behavior frames/s around cue presentation. Experiment 1 examined the emergence of danger-specific behaviors over fear acquisition. Experiment 2 examined the expression of danger-specific behaviors in fear extinction. In total, we scored 112,000 frames for nine discrete behavior categories. Temporal ethograms show that during acquisition, a fear conditioned cue suppresses reward seeking and elicits freezing, but also elicits locomotion, jumping, and rearing – all of which are maximal when foot shock is imminent. During extinction, a fear conditioned cue most prominently suppresses reward seeking, and elicits locomotion that is timed to shock delivery. The independent expression of these behaviors in both experiments reveals a fear conditioned cue to orchestrate a temporally organized suite of behaviors.
