Abstract

Open Science has changed research by making data accessible and shareable, contributing to replicability to accelerate and disseminate knowledge. However, for rodent cognitive studies the availability of tools to share and disseminate data is scarce. Automated touchscreen-based tests enable systematic cognitive assessment with easily standardized outputs that can facilitate data dissemination. Here we present an integration of touchscreen cognitive testing with an open-access database public repository (mousebytes.ca), as well as a Web platform for knowledge dissemination (https://touchscreencognition.org). We complement these resources with the largest dataset of age-dependent high-level cognitive assessment of mouse models of Alzheimer's disease, expanding knowledge of affected cognitive domains from male and female mice of three mouse strains. We envision that these new platforms will enhance sharing of protocols, data availability and transparency, allowing meta-analysis and reuse of mouse cognitive data to increase the replicability/reproducibility of datasets.

Data availability

Automated quality control (QC) algorithm and the codes are available for free download and modification in GitHub https://github.com/srmemar/Mousebytes-An-open-access-high-throughput-pipeline-and-database-for-rodent-touchscreen-based-dataThe touchscreen processed data were deposited into an open-access application (http://www.mousebytes.ca/).

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Flavio H Beraldo

    Robarts Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Daniel Palmer

    Robarts Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Sara Memar

    Robarts Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. David I Wasserman

    Robarts Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Wai-Jane V Lee

    Robarts Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Shuai Liang

    Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Hospital, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Samantha D Creighton

    Department of Psychology and Neuroscience Program, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Benjamin Kolisnyk

    Robarts Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Matthew F Cowan

    Robarts Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Justin Mels

    Robarts Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Talal S Masood

    Robarts Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Chris Fodor

    Robarts Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Mohammed A Al-Onaizi

    Robarts Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Robert Bartha

    Robarts Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Tom Gee

    Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Hospital, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. Lisa M Saksida

    Robarts Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
    Competing interests
    Lisa M Saksida, consults for Campden Instruments, Ltd.
  17. Timothy J Bussey

    Robarts Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
    Competing interests
    Timothy J Bussey, consults for Campden Instruments, Ltd.
  18. Stephen S Strother

    Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Hospital, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  19. Vania F Prado

    Robarts Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  20. Boyer D Winters

    Department of Psychology and Neuroscience Program, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada
    For correspondence
    bwinters@uoguelph.ca
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  21. Marco A M Prado

    Robarts Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
    For correspondence
    mprado@robarts.ca
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3028-5778

Funding

Weston Brain Institute

  • Robert Bartha
  • Stephen S Strother
  • Boyer D Winters
  • Marco A M Prado

Canada Open Neuroscience Platform

  • Sara Memar
  • Timothy J Bussey
  • Marco A M Prado

Mitacs

  • Daniel Palmer
  • Lisa M Saksida
  • Timothy J Bussey

CIFAR

  • Lisa M Saksida

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP136930)

  • Marco A M Prado

Alzheimer's Society

  • Vania F Prado
  • Marco A M Prado

Canada First Research Excellence Fund (BrainsCAN)

  • Robert Bartha
  • Lisa M Saksida
  • Timothy J Bussey
  • Vania F Prado
  • Marco A M Prado

Brain Canada

  • Vania F Prado
  • Marco A M Prado

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP126000)

  • Vania F Prado
  • Marco A M Prado

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP89919)

  • Vania F Prado
  • Marco A M Prado

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

  • Lisa M Saksida
  • Timothy J Bussey
  • Vania F Prado

Canada Research Chairs

  • Lisa M Saksida
  • Marco A M Prado

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Andrew Holmes, NIH, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Procedures were conducted in accordance with approved animal protocols at the University of Western Ontario (2016/104) and the University of Guelph (3481) following the Canadian Council of Animal Care and National Institutes of Health guidelines.

Version history

  1. Received: June 24, 2019
  2. Accepted: December 11, 2019
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: December 11, 2019 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: December 27, 2019 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2019, Beraldo et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,192
    views
  • 293
    downloads
  • 31
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Flavio H Beraldo
  2. Daniel Palmer
  3. Sara Memar
  4. David I Wasserman
  5. Wai-Jane V Lee
  6. Shuai Liang
  7. Samantha D Creighton
  8. Benjamin Kolisnyk
  9. Matthew F Cowan
  10. Justin Mels
  11. Talal S Masood
  12. Chris Fodor
  13. Mohammed A Al-Onaizi
  14. Robert Bartha
  15. Tom Gee
  16. Lisa M Saksida
  17. Timothy J Bussey
  18. Stephen S Strother
  19. Vania F Prado
  20. Boyer D Winters
  21. Marco A M Prado
(2019)
MouseBytes, an open-access high-throughput pipeline and database for rodent touchscreen-based cognitive assessment
eLife 8:e49630.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49630

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49630

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Neuroscience
    Bohan Zhu, Richard I Ainsworth ... Javier González-Maeso
    Research Article

    Genome-wide association studies have revealed >270 loci associated with schizophrenia risk, yet these genetic factors do not seem to be sufficient to fully explain the molecular determinants behind this psychiatric condition. Epigenetic marks such as post-translational histone modifications remain largely plastic during development and adulthood, allowing a dynamic impact of environmental factors, including antipsychotic medications, on access to genes and regulatory elements. However, few studies so far have profiled cell-specific genome-wide histone modifications in postmortem brain samples from schizophrenia subjects, or the effect of antipsychotic treatment on such epigenetic marks. Here, we conducted ChIP-seq analyses focusing on histone marks indicative of active enhancers (H3K27ac) and active promoters (H3K4me3), alongside RNA-seq, using frontal cortex samples from antipsychotic-free (AF) and antipsychotic-treated (AT) individuals with schizophrenia, as well as individually matched controls (n=58). Schizophrenia subjects exhibited thousands of neuronal and non-neuronal epigenetic differences at regions that included several susceptibility genetic loci, such as NRG1, DISC1, and DRD3. By analyzing the AF and AT cohorts separately, we identified schizophrenia-associated alterations in specific transcription factors, their regulatees, and epigenomic and transcriptomic features that were reversed by antipsychotic treatment; as well as those that represented a consequence of antipsychotic medication rather than a hallmark of schizophrenia in postmortem human brain samples. Notably, we also found that the effect of age on epigenomic landscapes was more pronounced in frontal cortex of AT-schizophrenics, as compared to AF-schizophrenics and controls. Together, these data provide important evidence of epigenetic alterations in the frontal cortex of individuals with schizophrenia, and remark for the first time on the impact of age and antipsychotic treatment on chromatin organization.

    1. Neuroscience
    Aedan Yue Li, Natalia Ladyka-Wojcik ... Morgan Barense
    Research Article

    Combining information from multiple senses is essential to object recognition, core to the ability to learn concepts, make new inferences, and generalize across distinct entities. Yet how the mind combines sensory input into coherent crossmodal representations - the crossmodal binding problem - remains poorly understood. Here, we applied multi-echo fMRI across a four-day paradigm, in which participants learned 3-dimensional crossmodal representations created from well-characterized unimodal visual shape and sound features. Our novel paradigm decoupled the learned crossmodal object representations from their baseline unimodal shapes and sounds, thus allowing us to track the emergence of crossmodal object representations as they were learned by healthy adults. Critically, we found that two anterior temporal lobe structures - temporal pole and perirhinal cortex - differentiated learned from non-learned crossmodal objects, even when controlling for the unimodal features that composed those objects. These results provide evidence for integrated crossmodal object representations in the anterior temporal lobes that were different from the representations for the unimodal features. Furthermore, we found that perirhinal cortex representations were by default biased towards visual shape, but this initial visual bias was attenuated by crossmodal learning. Thus, crossmodal learning transformed perirhinal representations such that they were no longer predominantly grounded in the visual modality, which may be a mechanism by which object concepts gain their abstraction.